Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: State of the art

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 530-536

  Lee, Anne ^a,b   Skött, Line Sinding ^a,b   Hansen, Helle Ploug ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b Centre for Applied Health Services   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Health technology assessment; Methodology; Organization; Patient

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; ETHICAL ISSUES; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; HOME PAGE; ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOM SAMPLE; STATE OF THE ART;

HEALTH; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; TECHNOLOGY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ASPECT; ENVIRONMENT; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ENVIRONMENT; ETHICS, CLINICAL; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; WORKFLOW;

EID: 74049139621     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309990456     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Banta HD, Luce B. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
2. Draborg E, Gyrd-Hansen D, Poulsen PB, Hørder M. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:89-95.
3. Fulop N, Allen P, Clarke A, Black N. From health technology assessment to research on the organisation and delivery of health services: addressing the balance. Health Policy. 2002;63:155-165.
4. Garćia-Alŕes A, Ondategui-Parra S, Neumann PJ. Crossnational comparison of technology assessment processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:300-310.
5. Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta HD, et al. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:220-286.
6. Hansen HP. The patient. In: Kristensen FB, Sigmund H, eds. Health technology assessment handbook. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health; 2007.
7. Johri M, Lehoux P. The great escape? Prospects for regulating assess to technology through health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:179-193.
8. Kristensen FB, Sigmund H, eds. Health technology assessment handbook. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health; 2007.
9. Lee A, Sinding LS. A review of organisational and patientrelated assessments in HTAs. Copenhagen: INAHTA members of the National Board of Health, Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment; 2007.
10. Lehoux P, Blume S. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25:1084-1120.
11. Lehoux P, Tailliez S, Denis J-L, Hivon M. Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualisation of findings. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:325-336.
12. Liberati A, Sheldon TA, Banta D. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on methodology.Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:186-219.
13. Perry S, Gardner E, ThamerM. The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:81-98.
14. Poulsen PB. Health technology assessment and diffusion of health technology.Odense, Denmark:OdenseUniversity Press; 1999.
15. Velasco M, Perleth M, Drummond M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:361-422.