The time course of segmentation and cue-selectivity in the human visual cortex

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Appelbaum, Lawrence G ^a,b   Ales, Justin M ^c   Norcia, Anthony M ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; RETINA IMAGE; SCALP; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRIATE CORTEX; VISUAL AREA V4; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84858988515     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034205     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Kastner S, De Weerd P, Ungerleider LG, (2000) Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. J Neurophysiol 83: 2453-2457.
2. Schira MM, Fahle M, Donner TH, Kraft A, Brandt SA, (2004) Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. J Neurophysiol 91: 1716-1721.
3. Scholte HS, Witteveen SC, Spekreijse H, Lamme VA, (2006) The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation. Brain Res 1076: 106-115.
4. Schubo A, Meinecke C, Schroger E, (2001) Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 11: 341-361.
5. Nothdurft HC, Gallant JL, Van Essen DC, (1999) Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: correlates of "popout" under anesthesia. Vis Neurosci 16: 15-34.
6. Knierim JJ, van Essen DC, (1992) Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 67: 961-980.
7. Maffei L, Fiorentini A, (1976) The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields. Vision Res 16: 1131-1139.
8. Fitzpatrick D, (2000) Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 438-443.
9. Nothdurft HC, Gallant JL, Van Essen DC, (2000) Response profiles to texture border patterns in area V1. Vis Neurosci 17: 421-436.
10. Blakemore C, Tobin EA, (1972) Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 15: 439-440.
11. DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD, Ohzawa I, (1994) Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 71: 347-374.
12. Nelson JI, Frost BJ, (1978) Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field. Brain Res 139: 359-365.
13. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W, Movshon JA, (2002) Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 88: 2547-2556.
14. Akasaki T, Sato H, Yoshimura Y, Ozeki H, Shimegi S, (2002) Suppressive effects of receptive field surround on neuronal activity in the cat primary visual cortex. Neurosci Res 43: 207-220.
15. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E, (1985) Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception 14: 105-126.
16. Li CY, Li W, (1994) Extensive integration field beyond the classical receptive field of cat's striate cortical neurons-classification and tuning properties. Vision Res 34: 2337-2355.
17. Levitt JB, Lund JS, (1997) Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature 387: 73-76.
18. Sillito AM, Grieve KL, Jones HE, Cudeiro J, Davis J, (1995) Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities. Nature 378: 492-496.
19. Li Z, (2000) Pre-attentive segmentation in the primary visual cortex. Spat Vis 13: 25-50.
20. von der Heydt R, Peterhans E, (1989) Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity. J Neurosci 9: 1731-1748.
21. Marcus DS, Van Essen DC, (2002) Scene segmentation and attention in primate cortical areas V1 and V2. J Neurophysiol 88: 2648-2658.
22. Schmid AM, (2008) The processing of feature discontinuities for different cue types in primary visual cortex. Brain Res 1238: 59-74.
23. Xu WF, Shen ZM, Li CY, (2005) Spatial phase sensitivity of V1 neurons in alert monkey. Cereb Cortex 15: 1697-1702.
24. Westheimer G, (1979) The spatial sense of the eye. Proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 893-912.
25. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Itzchak Y, Malach R, (1998) Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe. Neuron 21: 191-202.
26. Scholte HS, Jolij J, Fahrenfort JJ, Lamme VA, (2008) Feedforward and recurrent processing in scene segmentation: electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 2097-2109.
27. Appelbaum LG, Ales JM, Cottereau B, Norcia AM, (2010) Configural specificity of the lateral occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia 48: 3323-3328.
28. Appelbaum LG, Wade AR, Pettet MW, Vildavski VY, Norcia AM, (2008) Figure-ground interaction in the human visual cortex. J Vis 8: 8 1-19.
29. Appelbaum LG, Wade AR, Vildavski VY, Pettet MW, Norcia AM, (2006) Cue-invariant networks for figure and background processing in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 26: 11695-11708.
30. Appelbaum LG, Norcia AM, (2009) Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing. J Vis 9: 1-12.
31. Cottereau BR, Ales JM, Norcia AM, (In Press) Increasing the accuracy of EEG/MEG cortical reconstructions using functional area source corrrelation constraints. Hum Brain Mapp.
32. Ales JM, Yates JL, Norcia AM, (2010) V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli. Neuroimage 52: 1401-1409.
33. Malach R, Reppas JB, Benson RR, Kwong KK, Jiang H, et al. (1995) Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 8135-8139.
34. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N, (2000) Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20: 3310-3318.
35. Ales JM, Norcia AM, (2009) Assessing direction-specific adaptation using the steady-state visual evoked potential: results from EEG source imaging. J Vis 9: 8.
36. Smith SM, (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17: 143-155.
37. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, et al. (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 (Suppl 1): S208-219.
38. Engel SA, Glover GH, Wandell BA, (1997) Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb Cortex 7: 181-192.
39. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N, (2000) Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J Neurosci 20: 3310-3318.
40. Vinberg J, Grill-Spector K, (2008) Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 99: 1380-1393.
41. Bach M, Meigen T, (1992) Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential. Vision Res 32: 417-424.
42. Lamme VA, Van Dijk BW, Spekreijse H, (1992) Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey. Evidence from VEP experiments. Vision Res 32: 797-807.
43. Maurer U, Brandeis D, McCandliss B, (2005) Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behavioral and Brain Functions 1: 13.
44. Blair RC, Karniski W, (1993) An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology 30: 518-524.
45. Heinrich SP, Andres M, Bach M, (2007) Attention and visual texture segregation. Journal of vision 7: 6.
46. Caputo G, Romani A, Callieco R, Gaspari D, Cosi V, (1999) Amodal completion in texture visual evoked potentials. Vision Res 39: 31-38.
47. Bach M, Meigen T, (1997) Similar electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation induced by luminance, orientation, motion and stereo. Vision Res 37: 1409-1414.
48. Fahle M, Quenzer T, Braun C, Spang K, (2003) Feature-specific electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation. Vision Res 43: 7-19.
49. Kandil FI, Fahle M, (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of purely temporal figure-ground segregation. Vision research 43: 2583-2589.
50. Murray MM, Foxe DM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ, (2004) Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 24: 6898-6903.
51. Fahrenfort JJ, Scholte HS, Lamme VA, (2008) The spatiotemporal profile of cortical processing leading up to visual perception. J Vis 8: 12 11-12.
52. Fahrenfort JJ, Scholte HS, Lamme VA, (2007) Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 1488-1497.
53. Casco C, Grieco A, Campana G, Corvino MP, Caputo G, (2005) Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans. Vision Res 45: 2384-2396.
54. Bach M, Meigen T, (1998) Electrophysiological correlates of human texture segregation, an overview. Doc Ophthalmol 95: 335-347.
55. Pitts MA, Martinez A, Brewer JB, Hillyard SA, (2011) Early stages of figure-ground segregation during perception of the face-vase. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 23: 880-895.
56. Bair W, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA, (2003) Time course and time-distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurosci 23: 7690-7701.
57. Khoe W, Freeman E, Woldorff MG, Mangun GR, (2006) Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex. Brain research 1078: 101-111.
58. Shen ZM, Xu WF, Li CY, (2007) Cue-invariant detection of centre-surround discontinuity by V1 neurons in awake macaque monkey. J Physiol 583: 581-592.
59. Cao A, Schiller PH, (2003) Neural responses to relative speed in the primary visual cortex of rhesus monkey. Vis Neurosci 20: 77-84.
60. El-Shamayleh Y, Movshon JA, (2011) Neuronal responses to texture-defined form in macaque visual area V2. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31: 8543-8555.
61. Lamme VA, (1995) The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 15: 1605-1615.
62. Zhou H, Friedman HS, von der Heydt R, (2000) Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20: 6594-6611.
63. Thielscher A, Neumann H, (2007) A computational model to link psychophysics and cortical cell activation patterns in human texture processing. Journal of computational neuroscience 22: 255-282.
64. De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG, (1996) Cue-dependent deficits in grating orientation discrimination after V4 lesions in macaques. Visual neuroscience 13: 529-538.
65. Hupe JM, James AC, Payne BR, Lomber SG, Girard P, et al. (1998) Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons. Nature 394: 784-787.
66. Merigan WH, (1996) Basic visual capacities and shape discrimination after lesions of extrastriate area V4 in macaques. Visual neuroscience 13: 51-60.
67. Merigan WH, (2000) Cortical area V4 is critical for certain texture discriminations, but this effect is not dependent on attention. Visual neuroscience 17: 949-958.
68. Heinen K, Jolij J, Lamme VA, (2005) Figure-ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 16: 1483-1487.