Social Desirability Bias in Survey Research on Sustainable Development in Small Firms: An Exploratory Analysis of Survey Mode Effect

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 223-235

  Roxas, Banjo ^a   Lindsay, Val ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Environmental sustainability; Research methods; Small and medium enterprises; Small firms; Social desirability bias; Survey modes; Survey research; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE; SURVEY METHOD; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84858800174     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.730     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Angus-Leppan T, Benn S, Young L. 2010. A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(4): 230-244.
2. Aragón-Correa J, Hurtado-Torresa N, García-Moralesa V. 2008. Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 86(1): 88-103.
3. Armstrong JS, Overton, TS. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14: 396-402.
4. Arnold H, Feldman D, Purbhoo M. 1985. The role of social desirability response bias in turnover research. Academy of Management Journal 28(40): 955-966.
5. Babbie E. 1995. The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.
6. Bagozzi R, Yi Y, Phillips L. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organisational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(3): 421-458.
7. Belz FM, Schmidt-Riediger B. 2010. Marketing strategies in the age of sustainable development: evidence from the food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 401-416.
8. Bos-Brouwers H. 2010. Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 417-435.
9. Brown T. 2006. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford: London.
10. Carter C, Easton P. 2011. Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 41(1): 46-62.
11. Cerin P. 2002. Characteristics of environmental reporters on the OM Stockholm Exchange. Business Strategy and the Environment 11: 298-311.
12. Chung J, Monroe G. 2003. Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics 44: 291-302.
13. Collins E, Lawrence S, Pavlovich K, Ryan C. 2007. Business networks and the uptake of sustainability practices: the case of New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(8/9): 729-740.
14. Collins E, Roper J, Lawrence S. 2010. Sustainability practices: trends in New Zealand businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(8): 479-494.
15. Cordano M, Marshall R, Silverman M. 2010. How do small and medium enterprises go 'Green'? A study of environmental management programs in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics 92(3): 463-478.
16. Crowe D, Brennan L. 2007. Environmental considerations within manufacturing strategy: an international study. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(4): 266-289.
17. Cummings L. 2008. Managerial attitudes toward environmental management within Australia, the People's Republic of China and Indonesia. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 16-29.
18. Darnall N, Jolley GJ, Handfield R. 2008. Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment 17(8): 30-45.
19. Diaz-Rainey I, Ashton J. 2010. Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: green consumerism as an environmental policy tool? Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.699.
20. Dillman DA. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: the Total Design Method. Wiley: New York.
21. Dillman D, Phelps G, Torotra R, Swift K, Kohrell J, Berck J, Messer B. 2009. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research 38: 1-18.
22. Elke H, Bos-Brouwers J. 2010. Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(7): 417-435.
23. Ethier R, Poe G, Schulze W, Clark J. 2000. A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for green-pricing electricity programs. Land Economics 76(1): 54-67.
24. Fornell C, Larcker D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 48: 39-50.
25. Frondel M, Horbach J, Rennings K. 2007. End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(8): 571-584.
26. Gadenne DL, Kennedy J, McKeiver C. 2009. An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics 23(5): 45-63.
27. Gago R, Antolin M. 2004. Environmental management and strategic positioning of Spanish manufacturing industries. Business Strategy and the Environment 13: 33-42.
28. Ganster D, Hennessey H, Luthans F. 1983. Social desirability response effects: three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal 26(2): 321-331.
29. Gerpott T, Mahmudova I. 2010. Determinants of price mark-up tolerance for green electricity - lessons for environmental marketing strategies from a study of residential electricity customers in Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(5): 304-318.
30. Greenlaw C, Brown-Welty S. 2009. A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Evaluation Review 33(5): 464-480.
31. Groves R. 2006. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 646-675.
32. Jo M. 2000. Controlling for social desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models. Psychology and Marketing 17(2): 137-148.
33. King M, Bruner G. 2000. Social desirability bias: a neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing 17(2): 79-103.
34. Kostova T. 1997. Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 180-189.
35. Leggett C, Kleckner N, Boyle K, Duffield J, Mitchell R. 2003. Social desirability bias in contingent valuation surveys administered through in-person interviews. Land Economics 79(4): 561-575.
36. Leonidou C, Leonidou L. 2009. Research into environmental marketing/management: a bibliographic analysis. European Journal of Marketing 45(1/2): 68-103.
37. Llena F, Moneva J, Hernandez B. 2007. Environmental disclosures and compulsory accounting standards: the case of Spanish annual reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(1): 50-63.
38. Maguire K. 2009. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 3528-3533.
39. Martin-Tapia I, Aragón-Correa J, Rueda-Manzanares A. 2010. Environmental strategy and exports in medium, small and micro-enterprises. Journal of World Business 45(3): 266-275.
40. Meehan J, Bryde D. 2011. Sustainable procurement practice. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(2): 94-106.
41. Merritt J. 1998. EM into SME won't go? Attitudes, awareness and practices in the London Borough of Croydon. Business Strategy and the Environment 7: 90-100.
42. Millar H, Russell S. 2011. The adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in the Caribbean. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.707.
43. Mir D, Feitelson E. 2007. Factors affecting environmental behaviour in micro-enterprises: laundry and motor vehicle repair firms in Jerusalem. International Small Business Journal 25(4): 383-415.
44. National Statistics Office. 2010. Annual Survey of Philippine Business and Industry. [20 May 2011].
45. Niskanen J, Nieminen T. 2001. The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: a study of Finnish listed firms' environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment 10: 29-37.
46. Nunnally J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.
47. Perrini F, Castaldo S, Misani N, Tencati A. 2010. The impact of corporate social responsibility associations on trust in organic products marketed by mainstream retailers: a study of Italian consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(8): 512-526.
48. Petts J, Herd A, Gerrard S, Horne C. 1999. The climate and culture of environmental compliance within SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment 8: 14-30.
49. Presser S, Stinson L. 1998. Data collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendance. American Sociological Review 63(1): 137-145.
50. Randall D, Fernandes M. 1991. The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics 10: 805-817.
51. Revell A, Stokes D, Chen H. 2010. Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 273-288.
52. Roxas H, Lindsay V, Ashill N, Victorio A. 2009. Economic accountability in the context of local governance in the Philippines: a structural equation modelling approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 31(1): 17-38.
53. Salant P, Dillman DA. 1994. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. Wiley: New York.
54. Sandhu S, Ozanne L, Smallman C, Cullen R. 2010. Consumer driven corporate environmentalism: fact or fiction? Business Strategy and the Environment 19(6): 356-366.
55. Schwarz N, Strack F, Hippler H, Bishop G. 1991. The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 193-212.
56. Sharma S. 2001. Different strokes: regulatory styles and environmental strategy in the North-American oil and gas industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(6): 344-364.
57. Sharma S, Nguan O. 1999. The biotechnology industry and strategies of biodiversity conservation: the influence of managerial interpretations and risk propensity. Business Strategy and the Environment 8(1): 46-61.
58. Vaaland T, Heide M, Gronhaug K. 2007. Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing 42(9/10): 927-953.
59. Wagner M 2009. National culture, regulation and country interaction effects on the association of environmental management systems with environmentally beneficial innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(2): 122-136.