How drug policy should (not) be: Institutionalised young people's perspectives

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 491-497

  Vander Laenen, Freya ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Behavioural disorders; Institution; Perception; Prevention; Qualitative; Youth

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BELGIUM; CHILD; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HELP SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNISHMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TRUST; ADDICTION; CHILD BEHAVIOR; DRUG CONTROL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL HEALTH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT, INSTITUTIONALIZED; BELGIUM; CHILD; DRUG AND NARCOTIC CONTROL; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858784072     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: 18734758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Balen R., Blyth E., Calabretto H., Fraser C., Horrocks C., Manby M. Involving children in health and social research, 'Human becomings' or 'active beings'?. Childhood, A Journal of Child Research 2006, 13:29-48.
2. Barkley R.A., Fischer M., Smallish L., Fletcher K. Young adult follow-up of hyperactive children: Antisocial activities and drug use. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2004, 45(2):195-211.
3. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. The handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education 1986, 241-258. Greenwood Press, New York. J.G. Richardson (Ed.).
4. Butters J.E. The impact of peers and social disapproval on high-risk cannabis use: Gender differences and implications for drug education. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2004, 11:381-390.
5. Cheung Y., Cheung N. Social capital and risk level of post treatment drug use: Implications for harm reduction among male treated addicts in Hong Kong. Addiction Research and Theory 2003, 11:145-162.
6. Chung T., Maisto S.A. Relapse to alcohol and other drug use in treated adolescents: Review and reconsideration of relapse as a change point in clinical course. Clinical Psychology Review 2006, 26(2):149-161.
7. Couwenbergh C., van den Brink W., Swart K., Vreugdenhil C., van Wijngaarden-Cremers P., van der Gaag R.J. Comorbid psychopathology in adolescents and young adults for substance use disorders. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2006, 15(6):319-328.
8. Cloud W., Granfield R. Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use and Misuse 2008, 43:1971-1986.
9. Curtis K., Roberts H., Copperman J., Downie A., Liabo K. 'How come I don't get asked no questions?' Researching 'hard to reach' children and teenagers. Child and Family Social Work 2004, 9:167-175.
10. de Boer C., Coady N. Good helping relationships in child welfare: Learning from stories of success. Child and Family Social Work 2007, 12:32-42.
11. Demant J., Järvinen M. Social capital as norms and resources: Focus groups discussing alcohol. Addiction Research and Theory 2011, 19(2):91-101.
12. D'Oosterlinck F., Broekaert E., De Wilde J., Bockaert L.F., Goethals I. Characteristics and profile of boys and girls with emotional and behavioural disorders in Flanders mental health institutes: A quantitative study. Child: Care, Health and Development 2006, 32:213-234.
13. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), (2009). Thematic papers. Preventing later substance use disorders in at-risk children and adolescents. Review of the theory and evidence base of indicated prevention. Lisbon: EMCDDA. Retrieved 16th December 2009 from: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/thematic-papers/indicated-prevention.
14. Fletcher A., Bonell C., Sorhaindo A., Rhodes T. Cannabis use and 'safe' identities in an inner-city school risk environment. International Journal of Drug Policy 2009, 20:244-250.
15. Goodley D., Runswick-Cole K. Problematising policy: Conceptions of 'child' and 'disabled' and 'parents' in social policy in England. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2011, 15(1):71-85.
16. Gosin M.N., Dustman P.A., Drapeau A.E., Harthun M.L. Participatory Action Research: Creating an effective prevention curriculum for adolescents in the Southwestern US. Health Education Research 2003, 18(3):363-379.
17. Guzys D., Kendall S. Advocating for a harm-minimization approach to drug education in Australian schools. The Journal of School Nursing 2006, 22:259-263.
18. Hammersley R., Reid M. Why the pervasive addiction myth is still believed. Addiction Research and Theory 2002, 10:7-30.
19. Hastings G., Stead M. Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology and Marketing 2004, 21:961-986.
20. Hathaway A.D Cannabis users' informal rules for managing stigma and risk. Deviant Behavior 2004, 25(6):559-577.
21. Hayatbakhsh M.R., Najman J.M., Jamrozik K., Al Mamun A., Bor W., Alati R. Adolescent problem behaviours predicting DSM-IV diagnoses of multiple substance use disorder. Findings of a prospective birth cohort study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2008, 43(5):356-363.
22. Hollar D., Moore D. Relationship of substance use by students with disabilities to long term educational, employment, and social outcomes. Substance Use and Misuse 2004, 39(6):931-962.
23. Hyman S., Sinha R. Stress-related factors in cannabis use and misuse: Implications for prevention and treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2009, 3:400-413.
24. Hill M. What's the problem? Who can help? The perspectives of children and young people on their well-being and on helping professionals. Journal of Social Work Practice 1999, 13:135-145.
25. Hollander J.A. The social context of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2004, 33(5):602-637.
26. James A., Prout A. Constructing and reconstructing childhood 2001, Routledge, London.
27. Jones M., Salmon D., Orme J. Young people's involvement in a substance misuse communications campaign. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2004, 11(5):391-405.
28. Belgian National Report on Drugs 2009 2009, Epidemiology Unit, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels. B. Lamkaddem, M. Roelands (Eds.).
29. MacDonald R., Marsh J. Crossing the Rubicon: Youth transitions, poverty, drugs and social exclusion. International Journal of Drug Policy 2002, 13(1):27-38.
30. MacMaster S.A., Holleran L.K., Chaffin K. Empirical and theoretical support for the inclusion of non-abstinence-based perspectives in prevention services for substance using adolescents. Journal of Evidence-based Social Work 2005, 2:91-111.
31. Madriz E. Focus groups in feminist research. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials 2003, 363-387. Sage, London. Second ed. N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.).
32. McCrystal P., Higgins K., Percy A. Drug use amongst 12- and 13-year-olds attending emotional and behavioral difficulty units in Belfast. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 2005, 10:203-218.
33. McCrystal P., Percy A., Higgins K. Drug use patterns and behaviours of young people at an increased risk of drug use during adolescence. International Journal of Drug Policy 2006, 17:393-401.
34. McIntosh J., MacDonald F., McKeganey N. The initial use of drugs in a sample of pre-teenage schoolchildren: The role of choice, pressure and influence. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2003, 10:147-158.
35. Morrow V. Young people's explanations and experiences of social exclusion: Retrieving Bourdieu's concept of social capital. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2001, 21(4-6):37-54.
36. Nation M., Crusto C., Wandersman A., Kumpfer K.L., Seybolt D., Morrissey-Kane E., Davino K. What works in prevention, principles of effective prevention programmes. American Psychologist 2003, 58:449-456.
37. Paterson B., Panessa C. Engagement as an ethical imperative in harm reduction involving at-risk youth. International Journal of Drug Policy 2008, 19(1):24-32.
38. Rhodes T., Lilly R., Fernandez C., Giorgino E., Kemmesis U.E., Ossebaard H.C., Lalam N., Faasen I., Spannow K.E. Risk factors associated with drug use: The importance of risk environment. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2003, 10:303-329.
39. Rich M., Ginsburg R. The reason and rhyme of qualitative research: why, when, and how to use qualitative methods in the study of adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health 1999, 25:371-378.
40. Ridge T., Millar J. Excluding children: Autonomy, friendship and the experience of the care system. Social Policy and Administration 2000, 34:160-175.
41. Roets G., Van Hove G. The story of Belle, Minnie, Louise and the Sovjets: Throwing light on the dark side of an institution. Disability and Society 2003, 18(5):599-624.
42. Room G. Poverty and social exclusion: The new European agenda for policy and research. Beyond the threshold 1995, 1-9. Policy Press, Bristol. G. Room (Ed.).
43. Ryan G.W., Bernard H.R. Data management and analysis methods. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials 2003, 259-309. Sage Publications, London. Second ed. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
44. Shamblen S.R., Derzon J.H. A preliminary study of the population-adjusted effectiveness of substance abuse prevention programming: Towards making IOM program types comparable. The Journal of Primary Prevention 2009, 30:89-107.
45. Steiker L.K.H. Making drug and alcohol prevention relevant. Adapting evidence-based curricula to unique adolescent cultures. Family Community Health 2008, 31(Suppl. 1):52-60.
46. Terry-McElrath Y., O'Malley P., Johnston L. Reasons for drug use among American youth by consumption level, gender, and race/ethnicity: 1976-2005. Journal of Drug Issues 2009, 39:677-713.
47. Tobler N.S, Roona M.R., Ochshorn P., Marshall D.G., Streke A.V., Stackpole K.M. School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention 2000, 20:275-336.
48. Tregaskis C. Social Model Theory: The story so far .... Disability and Society 2002, 17(4):457-470.
49. Vander Laenen F. 'I don't trust you, you are going to tell'. Adolescents with emotional and behavioural disorders participating in qualitative research. Child: Care, Health & Development 2009, 35:323-329.
50. Werch C.E., Owen D.M. Iatrogenic effects of alcohol and drug prevention programs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2002, 63(5):581-590.
51. White D., Pitts M. Educating young people about drugs: A systematic review. Addiction 1998, 93:1475-1487.
52. Wilson C.J., Deane F.P. Adolescent opinions about reducing help-seeking barriers and increasing appropriate help engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 2001, 12:345-364.
53. Winters K.C., Fawkes T., Fahnhorst T., Botzet A., August G. A synthesis review of exemplary drug abuse prevention programs in the United States. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2007, 32:371-380.
54. Zinberg N.E. Drug, set and setting: The basis for controlled intoxicant use 1984, Yale University Press, New Haven, London.