Perceptions of teacher candidates towards Web 2.0 technologies

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue , 2011, Pages 2663-2666

  Eyyam, Ramadan ^a   Meneviş, Ipek ^a   Dogruer, Nazan ^a  

^a EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Digital environment; Internet; Teacher candidates; Web 2.0 technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858775113     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.166     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Cabada, R., Estrada, M., Sanchez, L., Sandoval, G., Velazquez, J., & Barrientos, J. (2009). Modeling student's learning styles in web 2.0 learning systems. World Journal on Educational Technology, 1(2), 78-88.
2. Cavus, N. (2007). Tha Evaluation of the Attitudes of Information Systems Students to Data and Communication Tools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 87-95.
3. Franklin, T., & van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (3).
4. Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 21(3), 183-198.
5. McLean, R., Richards, B. H., & Wardman, J. I. (2007). The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution of folksonomic revolution?. Medical Journal of Australia, 187 (3), 174-177.
6. Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students?. Innovate 3 (4). http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=393 (accessed April 24, 2008).
7. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5).
8. Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008). Why Web 2.0 is food for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes. World Wide Web Conference 2008, Beijing, China.
9. th Annual Sloan Consortium International Conference Online Learning. Orlando, Florida.