Pupil-BLAH-metry: Cognitive effort in speech planning reflected by pupil dilation

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 754-765

  Papesh, Megan H ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Automaticity; Cognitive control; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUPIL REFLEX; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; READING; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858759771     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0263-y     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 15. 5. 802.
2. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 234-254. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 18. 2. 234.
3. Balota, D. A., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1289-1302. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 21. 5. 1289.
4. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 10. 3. 340.
5. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89-106. doi: 10. 1016/0749-596X(85)90017-8.
6. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193014.
7. Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276-292. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 91. 2. 276.
8. Becker, C., & Killion, T. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389-401. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 3. 3. 389.
9. Bradshaw, J. L. (1968). Load and pupillary changes in continuous processing tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 265-271. doi: 10. 1111/j. 2044-8295. 1968. tb01139. x.
10. Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41, 977-990. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 41. 4. 977.
11. Chee, M. W. L., Westphal, C., Goh, J., Graham, S., & Song, A. W. (2003). Word frequency and subsequent memory effects studied using event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 20, 1042-1051. doi: 10. 1016/S1053-8119(03)00335-5.
12. Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1084-1096. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 16. 6. 1084.
13. Dambacher, M., Kliegle, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. J. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89-103. doi: 10. 1016/j. brainres. 2006. 02. 010.
14. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.
15. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198438.
16. Goldiamond, I., & Hawkins, W. F. (1958). Vexierversuch: The log relationship between word-frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 457-463. doi: 10. 1037/h0043051.
17. Goldinger, S. D., Azuma, T., Abramson, M., & Jain, P. (1997). Open wide and say "blah!" Attentional dynamics of delayed naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 190-216. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1997. 2518.
18. Goldinger, S. D., He, Y., & Papesh, M. H. (2009). Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye-movements and pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1105-1122. doi: 10. 1037/a0016548.
19. Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198. doi: 10. 3758/BF03205983.
20. Granholm, E., Asarnow, R. F., Sarkin, A. J., & Dykes, K. L. (1996). Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology, 33, 457-461. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1996. tb01071. x.
21. Granholm, E., & Verney, S. P. (2004). Pupillary responses and attentional allocation on the visual backward masking task in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52, 37-52. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijpsycho. 2003. 12. 004.
22. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103. doi: 10. 1016/j. clinph. 2003. 12. 020.
23. Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2008). Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: Behavioral and pupillometric data. Psychophysiology, 45, 119-129. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2007. 00605. x.
24. Herdman, C. M. (1992). Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18, 460-470. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 18. 2. 460.
25. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431-439. doi: 10. 3758/BF03208203.
26. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154, 1583-1585. doi: 10. 1126/science. 154. 3756. 1583.
28. Karatekin, C., Couperus, J. W., & Marcus, D. J. (2004). Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. Psychophysiology, 41, 175-185. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2004. 00147. x.
29. Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A. (2008). Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 347-365. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2007. 06. 002.
30. Kello, C. T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 942-955. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 30. 5. 942.
31. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145-171. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 2001. 2835.
32. Kronbichler, M., Hutzler, F., Wimmer, H., Mair, A., Staffan, W., & Ladurner, G. (2004). The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: Evidence from a parametric fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21, 946-953. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2003. 10. 021.
33. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
34. Kuchinke, L., Võ, M. L.-H., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65, 132-140. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijpsycho. 2007. 04. 004.
35. Manelis, J. (1977). Frequency and meaningfulness in tachistoscopic word perception. The American Journal of Psychology, 99, 269-280. doi: 10. 2307/1422049.
36. McCann, R. S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 13. 1. 14.
37. McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43-65. doi: 10. 1016/0749-596X(90)90009-O.
38. O'Malley, S., Reynolds, M. G., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2008). Reading aloud: Spelling-sound translation uses central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 422-429. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 34. 2. 422.
39. Paap, K. R., & Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1129-1157. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 6. 1129.
40. Paivio, A., & Simpson, H. M. (1966). The effect of word abstractness and pleasantness on pupil size during an imagery task. Psychonomic Science, 5, 55-56.
41. Papesh, M. H., & Goldinger, S. D. (2011). Your effort is showing! Pupil dilation reveals memory heuristics. In P. Higham & J. Leboe (Eds.), Constructions of remembering and metacognition (pp. 215-224). Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Papesh, M. H., Goldinger, S. D., & Hout, M. C. (2012). Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 56-64. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijpsycho. 2011. 10. 002.
43. Porter, G., & Troscianko, T. (2003). Pupillary response to grating stimuli [Abstract]. Perception, 32(ECVP Abstract Suppl.), 156a.
44. Porter, G., Troscianko, T., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Effort during visual search and counting: Insights from pupillometry. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 211-229. doi: 10. 1080/17470210600673818.
45. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2006). E-Prime (Version 1. 2). Available at www. pstnet. com.
46. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201. doi: 10. 3758/BF03197692.
47. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogsys. 2005. 07. 002.
48. Richer, F., & Beatty, J. (1985). Pupillary dilations in movement preparation and execution. Psychophysiology, 22, 204-207. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1985. tb01587. x.
49. Richer, F., & Beatty, J. (1987). Contrasting effects of response uncertainty on the task-evoked pupillary response and reaction time. Psychophysiology, 24, 258-262. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1987. tb00291. x.
50. Richer, F., Silverman, C., & Beatty, J. (1983). Response selection and initiation in speeded reactions: A pupillometric analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 9, 360-370. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 9. 3. 360.
51. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3.
52. Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18, 367-379. doi: 10. 3758/BF03197126.
53. Savage, G. R., Bradley, D. C., & Forster, K. I. (1990). Word frequency and the pronunciation task: The contribution of articulatory fluency. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 203-236. doi: 10. 1080/01690969008402105.
54. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 3. 1. 1.
55. Stone, G. O., & van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic processes in printed word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 19, 744-774. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 19. 4. 744.
56. van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology, 41, 167-174. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2003. 00148. x.
57. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198326.
58. Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143-154.
59. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Tse, C.-S., & Besner, D. (2008). On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 495-513. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 34. 3. 495.