International positive and negative affect schedule short-form (I-PANAS-SF): Testing for factorial invariance across cultures

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue , 2011, Pages 2016-2022

  Karim, Jahanvash ^a   Weisz, Robert ^a   Rehman, Shafiq Ur ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b QUAID I AZAM UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Affectivity; Cross cultural; Factorial invariance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858758507     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.046     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Codes of Conduct. Washington, DC: APA.
2. uckle, J. (2007). Amos 16 User's Guide. Amos Development Corporation: Spring House.
3. Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255-1260.
4. Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. (1980) Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
5. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
7. Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
8. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences (2nd ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
9. Limbers, C. A., Newman, D. A., & Varni, J. W. (2009). Factorial invariance of child self-report across race/ethnicity groups: A multigroup confirmatory factor analysis approach utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Ann Epidemiol, 19, 575-581.
10. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.
11. Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2004). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.
12. Nguyen, H. T., Kitner-Triolo, M., Evans, M. K., & Zonderman, A. B. (2004). Factorial invariance of the CES-D in low socioeconomic status African Americans compared with a nationality representative sample. Psychiatry Research, 126, 177-187.
13. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172.
15. Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 78-90.
16. Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38-227.
17. Watson, D. L., Clark, A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
18. Wintre, M. G., North, C., & Sugar, L. A. (2001). Psychologists' response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology, 42(3), 216-225.