A biologically plausible model for rapid natural image identification

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 629-637

  Ghebreab, S ^a   Smeulders, A W M ^a   Scholte, H S ^a   Lamme, V A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING;

CONTRAST STATISTICS; IMAGE IDENTIFICATION; NATURAL IMAGES; NATURAL SCENES; NEURAL RESPONSE; PLAUSIBLE MODEL; PROPERTY; RAPID EXTRACTION; RESPONSE MODEL; WEIBULL;

WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84858734650     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. E.P. Simoncelli and Olshausen. B. Naturalimage statistics and neural representation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 24:11931216, 2001.
2. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Visual Perception, Progress in Brain Research, 155, 2006.
3. S. G. Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 11(7):674-693, 1989.
4. M.A. Thomson. Higher-order structure in natural scenes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 16:15491553, 1999.
5. E.P. Simoncelli, A. Srivastava, A.B. Lee, and S-C Zhu. On advances in statistical modeling of natural images. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 18(1), 2003.
6. J. M. Geusebroek and A. W. M. Smeulders. A six-stimulus theory for stochastic texture. International Journal of Computer Vision, 62(1/2):7-16, 2005.
7. H. S. Scholte, S. Ghebreab, A. Smeulders, and V. Lamme. Brain responses strongly correlate with weibull image statistics when processing natural images. Journal of Vision, 9(4): 1-15, 2009.
8. K.N. Kay, T. Naselaris, R.J. Prenger, and J.L. Gallant. Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature, 452:352-355, 2008.
9. L.J. Croner and E. Kaplan. Receptive fields of p and m ganglion cells across the primate retina. Vision Research, 35(11):7-24, 1995.
10. V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini. The suppressive field of neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience, 25:10844-10856, 2005.
11. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11): 1019-1025, November 1999.
12. S. Ghebreab, H.S Scholte, V.A.F. Lamme, and A.W.M. Smeulders. Neural adaption to the spatial distribution of multi-scale contrast in natural images. Submitted.
13. J.H. Elder and S.W. Zucker. Local scale control for edge detection and blur estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence, 20:699-716, 1998.
14. J. M. Geusebroek, R. van den Boomgaard, A. W. M. Smeulders, and H. Geerts. Color invariance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence, 23(12):1338-1350, 2001.
15. J. Ramsay and B. Silverman. Functional Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
16. M. Fabre-Thorpe, A. Delorme, C. Marlot, and S.J. Thorpe. A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorisation of novel natural scenes. Journal Cognitive Neuroscience, 13:171-180, 2001.
17. J.J. Fahrenfort, H.S. Scholte, and V.A.F. Lamme. The spatiotemporal profile of cortical processing leading up to visual perception. Journal of Vision, 8(1): 1-12, 2008.
18. L. Watanabe and R.W. Rodieck. Parasol and midget ganglion cells of the primate retina. Journal of Computational Neurology, 289:434-454, 1989.
19. W.H. Hsiao and R.P. Millane. Effects of occlusion, edges, and scaling on the power spectra of natural images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 22:1789-1797, 2005.