Systolic versus diastolic acquisition in myocardial perfusion MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 262, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 816-823

  Motwani, Manish ^a   Fairbairn, Timothy A ^a   Larghat, Abdulghani ^a   Mather, Adam N ^a   Biglands, John D ^b   Radjenovic, Aleksandra ^b   Greenwood, John P ^a   Plein, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SYSTOLE;

EID: 84858722332     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111549     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Yada T, Hiramatsu O, Kimura A, et al. In vivo observation of subendocardial microvessels of the beating porcine heart using a needle-probe videomicroscope with a CCD camera. Circ Res 1993;72(5):939-946. (Pubitemid 23105499)
2. Hiramatsu O, Goto M, Yada T, et al. In vivo observations of the intramural arterioles and venules in beating canine hearts. J Physiol 1998;509(Pt 2):619-628. (Pubitemid 28287018)
3. Chilian WM, Marcus ML. Phasic coronary blood flow velocity in intramural and epicardial coronary arteries. Circ Res 1982;50(6):775-781. (Pubitemid 12075561)
4. Kajiya F, Tomonaga G, Tsujioka K, Ogasawara Y, Nishihara H. Evaluation of local blood flow velocity in proximal and distal coronary arteries by laser Doppler method. J Biomech Eng 1985;107(1):10-15.
5. Gregg DE, Sabiston DC Jr. Effect of cardiac contraction on coronary blood flow. Circulation 1957;15(1):14-20.
6. Heller LI, Silver KH, Villegas BJ, Balcom SJ, Weiner BH. Blood flow velocity in the right coronary artery: assessment before and after angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24(4):1012-1017. (Pubitemid 24306412)
7. Radjenovic A, Biglands JD, Larghat A, et al. Estimates of systolic and diastolic myocardial blood flow by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(6):1696-1703.
8. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:35.
9. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542. (Pubitemid 34262671)
10. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998;25(1):73-84. (Pubitemid 28063691)
11. Biglands J, Magee D, Boyle R, Larghat A, Plein S, Radjenovi A. Evaluation of the effect of myocardial segmentation errors on myocardial blood flow estimates from DCE-MRI. Phys Med Biol 2011;56(8):2423-2443.
12. Patel AR, Antkowiak PF, Nandalur KR, et al. Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(7):561-569.
13. Marie PY, Danchin N, Karcher G, et al. Usefulness of exercise SPECT-thallium to detect asymptomatic restenosis in patients who had angina before coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1993;126(3 Pt 1):571-577. (Pubitemid 23274288)
14. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44(3):837-845.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
16. Shin T, Pohost GM, Nayak KS. Systolic 3D first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI: Comparison with diastolic imaging in healthy subjects. Magn Reson Med 2010;63(4):858-864.
17. Leong-Poi H, Le E, Rim SJ, Sakuma T, Kaul S, Wei K. Quantification of myocardial perfusion and determination of coronary stenosis severity during hyperemia using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001;14(12):1173-1182. (Pubitemid 33144383)
18. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2006;27(12):1465-1471. (Pubitemid 43998081)
19. Futamatsu H, Wilke N, Klassen C, et al. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2007;154(2):298-305. (Pubitemid 47069133)
20. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101(12):1379-1383. (Pubitemid 30169858)
21. Watkins S, McGeoch R, Lyne J, et al. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation 2009;120(22):2207-2213.
22. Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(6):514-522. (Pubitemid 47126780)
23. Kellman P, Arai AE. Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion - a review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9(3):525-537. (Pubitemid 46399023)
24. Plein S, Ryf S, Schwitter J, Radjenovic A, Boesiger P, Kozerke S. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t sense. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(4):777-785. (Pubitemid 47556883)
25. Plein S, Schwitter J, Suerder D, Greenwood JP, Boesiger P, Kozerke S. k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiology 2008;249(2):493-500.
26. Shin T, Hu HH, Pohost GM, Nayak KS. Three dimensional first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at 3T: feasibility study.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10(1):57.
27. Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57(1):70-75.
28. Muzik O, Duvernoy C, Beanlands RS, et al. Assessment of diagnostic performance of quantitative flow measurements in normal subjects and patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease by means of nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(3):534-540. (Pubitemid 28144117)
29. Beanlands RS, Muzik O, Melon P, et al. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial flow reserve in patients with coronary atherosclerosis using nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography: determination of extent of altered vascular reactivity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(6):1465-1475.
30. Wang L, Jerosch-Herold M, Jacobs DR Jr, Shahar E, Folsom AR. Coronary risk factors and myocardial perfusion in asymptomatic adults: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(3):565-572. (Pubitemid 43170845)