Comparative outcomes of open nephrectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, and full laparoscopic nephrectomy for living donors

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 22-25

  Ungbhakorn, P ^a   Kongchareonsombat, W ^a   Leenanupan, C ^a   Kijvikai, K ^a   Wisetsingh, W ^a   Patcharatrakul, S ^b   Jirasiritam, S ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b POLICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; BLEEDING; COLD ISCHEMIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FULL LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY; HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY; HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL FEE; NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HAND-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; THAILAND; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84858719439     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: 18732623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.026     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. R.J. Knight, L. Burrows, C. Bodian The influence of acute refection on long-term renal allograft survival: a comparison of living and cadaveric donor transplantation Transplantation 72 2001 69
2. N.H. Kok, W. Weimar, I.P. Alwayn The current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Europe Transplantation 82 2006 892
3. A.E. Handschin, M. Weber, N. Demartines Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy Br J Surg 90 2003 1323
4. T.G. Nanidis, D. Antcliffe, C. Kokkinos Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis Ann Surg 247 2008 58
5. Al Mitre, F.T. Dénes, W.C. Nahas Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy Clinics (See Paulo) 64 2009 23
6. R.E. Power, J.M. Preston, A. Griffin Laparoscopic vs open living donor nephrectomy: a contemporary series from one centre BJU Int 98 2006 133
7. A.A. Shokeir Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry J Urol 178 2007 1860 Epub 2007 Sep 17
8. S.L. Brown, T.R. Biehl, M.C. Rawlins Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison of the conventional open approach J Urol 165 2001 766
9. C. Kokkinos, T. Nanidis, D. Antcliffe Comparison of laparoscopic versus hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy Transplantation 83 2007 41
10. A. Srivastava, N. Gupta, A. Kumar Evolution of the technique of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy at a single center: experience with more than 350 cases Urol Int 81 2008 431
11. G. Ruiz-Deya, S. Cheng, E. Palmer Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes J Urol 166 2001 1270
12. L.E. Ratner, R.A. Montgomery, L.R. Kavoussi Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a review of the first 5 years Urol Clin North Am 28 2001 709
13. V. Hamidi, M.H. Andersen, O. Oyen Cost effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy Transplantation 87 2009 831
14. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P.-A. Clavien Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205