An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 163-187

  Xu, Dong Ling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Belief decision matrix; Belief structure; Evidence theory; Evidential reasoning; Multiple criteria decision analysis; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858698420     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0945-9     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Amor, S. B., Jabeur, K., & Martel, J. M. (2007). Multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(3), 1506-1515.
2. Augusto, J. C., Liu, J., McCullagh, P., Wang, H., & Yang, J. B. (2008). Management of uncertainty and spatio-temporal aspects for monitoring and diagnosis in a smart home. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 1(4), 361-378.
3. Bazerman, M. H. (2005). Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley.
4. Beynon, M., Curry, B., & Morgan, P. (2000). The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling. Omega, 28, 37-50.
5. Brans, J. P., & Mareshal, B. (1990). The PROMETHEE methods for MCDM; the PROMCALC, GAIA and bank adviser software. In C. A. B. E. Costa (Ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 253-276). Berlin: Springer.
6. Buede, D. M., & Girardi, P. (1997). A target identification comparison of Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer multisensor fusion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A. Systems and Humans, 27(5), 569-577.
7. Calzada, A., Liu, J., Rodriguez, R. M., & Martinez, L. (2010). A belief linguistic rule based inference methodology for handling decision making problem in qualitative nature. In Proceeding of FLINS (Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Technologies in Nuclear Science) Conference on Foundations and Applications of Computational Intelligence, Chengdu, China. Singapore: World Scientific.
8. Chin, K. S., Yang, J. B., Lam, J., & Guo, M. (2009). An evidential reasoning-interval based method for new product design assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(1), 142-156.
9. Deng, Y., Chan, F. T. S., Wu, Y., & Wang, D. (2011). A new linguistic MCDM method based on multiple-criterion data fusion. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(6), 6985-6993.
10. Denoeux, T. (2008). Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence. Artificial Intelligence, 172(2-3), 234-264.
11. Fan, Y., & Deer, P. (2008). Exploring evidential reasoning in multicriteria decision making under uncertainty. International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, 4(3-4), 211-224.
12. Farkas, A., & Rózsa, P. (2001). Data perturbations of matrices of pairwise comparisons. Annals of Operation Research, 101, 401-425.
13. Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Boston: Springer.
14. French, S. (1988). Decision theory an introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Ellis Horwood: Chichester.
15. French, S. (1989). Readings in decision analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
16. French, S., & Xu, D. L. (2005). Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analysis tools. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 13(2-3), 65-80.
17. Fu, C., & Yang, S. L. (2010). The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(3), 601-608.
18. Gonzales, C., & Jaffray, J. Y. (1998). Imprecise sampling and direct decision making. Annals of Operation Research, 80, 207-235.
19. Graham, G., & Hardaker, G. (1999). Contractor evaluation in the aerospace industry: using the evidential reasoning approach. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 162-173.
20. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R., & Zanakis, S. (2011). Global investing risk: a case study of knowledge assessment via rough sets. Annals of Operation Research, 185(1), 105-138.
21. Guitouni, A., Martel, J. M., Bélanger, M., & Hunter, C. (2008). Multiple criteria courses of action selection. Military Operations Research, 13(1), 35-50.
22. Guo, M., Yang, J. B., Chin, K. S., & Wang, H. W. (2007). Evidential reasoning based preference programming for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3), 1294-1312.
23. Guo, M., Yang, J. B., Chin, K. S., & Wang, H. W. (2009). Evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under both fuzzy and interval uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(3), 683-697.
24. Hilhorst, C., Ribbers, P., Heck, E. V., & Smits, M. (2008). Using Dempster-Shafer theory and real options theory to assess competing strategies for implementing IT infrastructures: a case study. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 344-355.
25. Hu, C. H., Si, X. S., & Yang, J. B. (2010). System reliability prediction model based on evidential reasoning algorithm with nonlinear optimization. Expert Systems With Applications, 37(3), 2550-2562.
26. Huynh, V. N., Nakamori, Y., Ho, T. B., & Murai, T. (2006). Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty: the evidential reasoning approach revisited. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 36(4), 804-822.
27. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
28. Iourinski, D., & Ramalingam, S. (2005). Using Dempster Shafer theory to aggregate usability study data. In Third international conference on information technology and applications (ICITA'05).
29. Jensen, F. V. (1997). Introduction to Bayesian networks. Berlin: Springer.
30. Kabak, Ö., & Ruan, D. (2010). A cumulative belief degree-based approach for missing values in nuclear safeguards evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. http://www. computer. org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10. 1109/TKDE. 2010. 60.
31. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. New York: Wiley.
32. Kong, G. L., Xu, D. L., Liu, X. B., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Applying a belief rule-base inference methodology to a guideline-based clinical decision support system. Expert Systems, 26(5), 391-408.
33. Li, H. (2007). Hierarchical risk assessment of water supply systems. Civil and building engineering. Loughborough, Loughborough University, PhD.
34. Liu, J., Wang, Y. M., & Martinez, L. (2008a). Extended belief rule-based inference framework. In Proceedings of 2008 international conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering (ISKE2008), Xiamen, China.
35. Liu, J., Yang, J. B., Ruan, D., Martinez, L., & Wang, J. (2008b). Self-tuning of fuzzy belief rule bases for engineering system safety analysis. Annals of Operation Research, 163(1), 143-168.
36. Liu, J., Martinez, L., Ruan, D., & Wang, H. (2009a). Generating consistent fuzzy belief rule base from sample data. In Proceeding of the 4th international conference on intelligent systems & knowledge engineering (ISKE2009), Hasselt, Belgium.
37. Liu, J., Ruan, D., Wang, H., & Martinez, L. (2009b). Improving IAEA safeguards evaluation through enhanced belief rule-based inference methodology. International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 3(3), 312-339.
38. Liu, X. B., Zhou, M., & Yang, J. B. (2010). Evidential Reasoning approach for MADA under group and fuzzy decision environment. In The 2nd international symposium on intelligent decision technologies (IDT-10), Baltimore, USA.
39. Martinez, L., Liu, J., Ruan, D., & Yang, J. B. (2007). Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes. Information Sciences, 177, 1533-1542.
40. Mohamed, R., & Watada, J. (2009). Logical method for logical operations based on evidential reasoning. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Soft Data Paradigms, 12, 151-172.
41. Nishisato, S., & Ahn, H. (1995). When not to analyze data: decision making on missing responses in dual scaling. Annals of Operation Research, 55, 361-378.
42. Phillips, L. D. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. London School of Economics and Political Science, Decision Analysis Unit.
43. Ren, J., Wang, J., Jenkinson, I., Xu, D. L., & Yang, J. B. (2009a). An offshore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian network. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 131(4). Available from http://link. aip. org/link/?JOM/131/041101.
44. Ren, J., Yusuf, Y. Y., & Burns, N. D. (2009b). A decision-support framework for agile enterprise partnering. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(1-2), 180-192.
45. Roy, B. (1990). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELEC-TRE methods. In C. A. B. E. Costa (Ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 155-183). Berlin: Springer.
46. Roy, B. (1996). Multi-criteria modelling for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
47. Ruan, D., Carchon, R., Meer, K. V. D., Liu, J., Wang, H., & Martinez, L. (2009). Belief rule-based inference methodology to improve nuclear safeguards information evaluation. In Proceeding of the 28th North America fuzzy information processing conference associated with IEEE (NAFIPS09), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
48. Saaty, T. L. (1988). The analytic hierarchy process. University of Pittsburgh.
49. Savage, S. L. (2009). The flaw of averages. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
50. Shafer, G. A. (1976). Mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Siow, C. H. R., Yang, J. B., & Dale, B. G. (2001). A new modelling framework for organisational self-assessment: development and application. Quality Management Journal, 8(4), 34-47.
52. Sonmez, M., Yang, J. B., & Holt, G. D. (2001). Addressing the contractor selection problem using an evidential reasoning approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(3), 198-210.
53. Sonmez, M., Graham, G., Yang, J. B., & Holt, G. D. (2002). Applying evidential reasoning to pre-qualifying construction contractors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), 111-119.
54. Stewart, T. (2005). Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (pp. 445-470). London: Springer.
55. Tanadtang, P., Park, D., & Hanaoka, S. (2005). Incorporating uncertain and incomplete subjective judgments into the evaluation procedure of transportation demand management alternatives. Transportation, 32(6), 603-626.
56. Tavana, M., Sodenkamp, M. A., & Suhl, L. (2010). A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement. Annals of Operation Research, 181(1), 393-421.
57. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methodologies: a comparative study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
58. Tsoukiàs, A. (2007). On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Annals of Operation Research, 154(1), 3-27.
59. Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. New York: Wiley.
60. Wang, J. (1997). A subjective methodology for safety analysis of safety requirements specifications. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 5, 1-13.
61. Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2007). A comparison of neural network, evidential reasoning and multiple regression analysis in modelling bridge risks. Expert Systems With Applications, 32, 336-348.
62. Wang, J., & Yang, J. B. (2001). A subjective safety based decision making approach for evaluation of safety requirements specifications in software development. International Journal of Reliability, Quality, and Safety Engineering, 8(1), 35-57.
63. Wang, J., Yang, J. B., & Sen, P. (1995). Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 47(2), 103-118.
64. Wang, J., Yang, J. B., & Sen, P. (1996). Multi-person and multi-attribute design evaluations using evidential reasoning based on subjective safety and cost analysis. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 52, 113-127.
65. Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2006b). The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 35-66.
66. Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2006a). Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(3), 1885-1913.
67. Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2007). On the combination and normalization of interval-valued belief structures. Information Sciences, 177.
68. Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., & Chin, K. S. (2009). Consumer preference prediction by using a hybrid evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(4), 8421-8430.
69. Xie, X. L., Xu, D. L., Yang, J. B., Wang, J., Ren, J., & Yu, S. (2008). Ship selection using a multiple criteria synthesis approach. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 13, 50-62.
70. Xu, D. L. (2009). Assessment of nuclear waste repository options using the ER approach. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 8(3).
71. Xu, D. L. (2010). A Web based assessment tool via the evidential reasoning approach. In D. Ruan (Ed.), Computational intelligence in complex decision systems. Paris: Atlantis Press.
72. Xu, D. L., & Foster, C. (2009). Prioritising product groups for carbon labelling. In 20th international conference on multiple criteria decision making, Chengdu, China.
73. Xu, D. L., & Yang, J. B. (2001). Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. (Working Paper Series, Paper No.: 0106), ISBN: 1-86115-111-X.
74. Xu, D. L., & Yang, J. B. (2003). Intelligent decision system for self-assessment. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12, 43-60.
75. Xu, D. L., & Yang, J. B. (2005). An intelligent decision system based on the evidential reasoning approach and its applications. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 3, 73-80.
76. Xu, D. L., McCarthy, G., & Yang, J. B. (2006a). Intelligent decision system and its application in business innovation self assessment. Decision Support Systems, 42, 664-673.
77. Xu, D. L., Yang, J. B., & Wang, Y. M. (2006b). The ER approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(3), 1914-1943.
78. Xu, D. L., Liu, J., Yang, J. B., Liu, G. P., Wang, J., Jenkinson, I., & Ren, J. (2007). Inference and learning methodology of belief-rule-based expert system for pipeline leak detection. Expert Systems With Applications, 32(1), 103-113.
79. Xu, D. L., Yang, J. B., & Liu, X. B. (2008). Handling uncertain and qualitative information in impact assessment-applications of IDS in policy making support. In H. Ruan, F. Hardeman, & K. van der Meer (Eds.), Intelligent decision and policy making support systems. Berlin: Springer.
80. Yager, R. R. (1987). On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Information Sciences, 41(2), 93-137.
81. Yang, J. B. (2001). Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1), 31-61.
82. Yang, S. L., & Fu, C. (2009). Constructing confidence belief functions from one expert. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(4), 8537-8548.
83. Yang, J. B., & Sen, P. (1994a). A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24(10), 1458-1473.
84. Yang, J. B., & Sen, P. (1994b). Evidential reasoning based hierarchical analysis for design selection of ship retro-fit options. In J. S. Gero & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in design, The Netherlands (pp. 327-344). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
85. Yang, J. B., & Sen, P. (1996). Interactive tradeoff analysis and preference modelling for preliminary multiobjective ship design. Systems Analysis, Modelling, Simulation, 26, 25-55.
86. Yang, J. B., & Sen, P. (1997). Multiple attribute design evaluation of large engineering products using the evidential reasoning approach. Journal of Engineering Design, 8(3), 211-230.
87. Yang, J. B., & Singh, M. G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24(1), 1-18.
88. Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2002a). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A. Systems and Humans, 32(3), 289-304.
89. Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2002b). Nonlinear information aggregation via evidential reasoning in multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A. Systems and Humans, 32(3), 376-393.
90. Yang, J. B., Dale, B. G., & Siow, C. H. R. (2001). Self-assessment of excellence: an application of the evidential reasoning approach. International Journal of Production Research, 39(16), 3789-3812.
91. Yang, J. B., Liu, J., Wang, J., Sii, H. S., & Wang, H. W. (2006a). A belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A. Systems and Humans, 36(2), 268-285.
92. Yang, J. B., Wang, Y. M., Xu, D. L., & Chin, K. S. (2006b). The evidential reasoning approach for MCDA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 309-343.
93. Yang, J. B., Liu, J., Xu, D. L., Wang, J., & Wang, H. W. (2007). Optimization models for training belief rule based systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A. Systems and Humans, 37(4), 569-585.
94. Yang, Z. L., Wang, J., Bonsall, S., & Fang, Q. G. (2009). Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Analysis, 29(1), 95-120.
95. Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., Xie, X. L., & Maddulapalli, A. K. (2011). Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis-prioritising voices of customer. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(9), 1638-1654.
96. Yao, R., & Zheng, J. (2010). A model of intelligent building energy management for the indoor environment. Intelligent Buildings International, 2(1), 72-80.
97. Zhang, X., & Zhou, X. (2009). Logistics service supplier assessment base on the ER approach. In Proceeding of 2009 international conference on electronic commerce and business intelligence, Beijing.
98. Zhang, Z. J., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (1989). A hierarchical analysis model for multiobjective decision making. In Analysis, design and evaluation of man-machine system, selected papers from the 4th IFAC/IFIP/ IFORS/IEA conference in 1989 (Ed), Xian, China (pp. 13-18). Pergamon, Oxford.
99. Zhou, Z. J., Hu, C. H., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., Chen, M. Y., & Zhou, D. H. (2010). A sequential learning algorithm for online constructing belief rule based systems. Expert Systems With Applications, 37, 1790-1799.