Awareness of Surveillance Recommendations Among Patients With Colorectal Adenomas

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 405-411

  Sint Nicolaas, Jerome ^a   de Jonge, Vincent ^a   Cahen, Djuna L ^b   Ouwendijk, Rob J Th ^c   Tang, Thjon J ^d   van Tilburg, Antonie J P ^e   van Leerdam, Monique E ^a   Kuipers, Ernst J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b AMSTELLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c IKAZIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d IJSSELLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e Sint Franciscus Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Colon cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Prevention; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

ADENOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84858697989     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., O'Brien M.J., et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993, 328:901-906.
2. Neugut A.I., Jacobson J.S., Ahsan H., et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 1995, 108:402-408.
3. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:1570-1595. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory G, Force USM-ST, American College of Radiology Colon Cancer C.
4. Mysliwiec P.A., Brown M.L., Klabunde C.N., et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy?. A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:264-271.
5. Schoen R.E., Pinsky P.F., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology 2010, 138:73-81.
6. Saini S.D., Nayak R.S., Kuhn L., et al. Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?. Results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009, 43:554-558.
7. Mulder S.A., Van Leerdam M.E., Ouwendijk R.J., et al. Attendance at surveillance endoscopy of patients with adenoma or colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007, 42:66-71.
8. Colquhoun P., Chen H.C., Kim J.I., et al. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up. Colorectal Dis 2004, 6:158-161.
9. Siddiqui A.A., Patel A., Huerta S. Determinants of compliance with colonoscopy in patients with adenomatous colon polyps in a veteran population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006, 24:1623-1630.
10. Brueckl W.M., Fritsche B., Seifert B., et al. Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (> or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas. World J Gastroenterol 2006, 12:7313-7318.
11. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34-42.
12. Nagengast F.M., Kaandorp C.J., werkgroep C.B.O. [Revised CBO guideline "Follow-up after polypectomy"]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001, 145:2022-2025.
13. Leffler D.A., Neeman N., Rabb J.M., et al. An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:1166-1173.
14. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., van Leerdam M.E., et al. Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2011, 43:560-572.
15. Pignone M., Rich M., Teutsch S.M., et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002, 137:132-141.
16. Mulder S.A., Ouwendijk R.J., van Leerdam M.E., et al. A nationwide survey evaluating adherence to guidelines for follow-up after polypectomy or treatment for colorectal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008, 42:487-492.
17. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., Lalor E.A., et al. A prospective audit of patient experiences in colonoscopy using the global rating scale: a cohort of 1,187 patients. Can J Gastroenterol 2010, 24:607-613.
18. Keighley M.R., O'Morain C., Giacosa A., et al. Public awareness of risk factors and screening for colorectal cancer in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 2004, 13:257-262.
19. Klabunde C.N., Vernon S.W., Nadel M.R., et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 2005, 43:939-944.
20. Holden D.J., Jonas D.E., Porterfield D.S., et al. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010, 152:668-676.
21. Rubin D.T., Ulitsky A., Poston J., et al. What is the most effective way to communicate results after endoscopy?. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 66:108-112.
22. Spodik M., Goldman J., Merli K., et al. Providing an endoscopy report to patients after a procedure: a low-cost intervention with high returns. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:103-111.
23. Ayanian J.Z., Sequist T.D., Zaslavsky A.M., et al. Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23:762-767.