Evaluation of Care and Surveillance of Cardiovascular Disease: Can We Trust Medico-administrative Hospital Data?

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 162-168

  Lambert, Laurie ^a   Blais, Claudia ^b,c   Hamel, Denis ^b   Brown, Kevin ^a   Rinfret, Stéphane ^d   Cartier, Raymond ^e   Giguère, Maude ^a   Carroll, Céline ^a   Beauchamp, Christiane ^a   Bogaty, Peter ^d  

^a Institut National d'Excellence en Sante et en Services Sociaux INESSS   (Canada)

^b INSTITUT NATIONAL DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e MONTREAL HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CARDIAC PATIENT; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MEDICO ADMINISTRATIVE HOSPITAL DATA; MORTALITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; REFERENCE DATABASE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUEBEC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84858622956     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Ciol M.A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:613-619.
2. Tu J.V., Austin P.C., Walld R., et al. Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 37:992-997.
3. Scott I.A., Thomson P.L., Narasimhan S. Comparing risk-prediction methods using administrative or clinical data in assessing excess in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Med J Aust 2008, 188:332-336.
4. Humphries K.H., Rankin J.M., Carere R.G., et al. Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?. J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53:343-349.
5. Tu J.V., Sykora K., Naylor C.D. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough?. Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30:1317-1323.
6. Parker J.P., Li Z., Damberg C.L., et al. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California. Med Care 2006, 44:687-695.
7. Aylin P., Bottle A., Majeed A. Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models. BMJ 2007, 334:1044.
8. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
9. D'Hoore W., Bouckaert A., Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49:1429-1433.
10. Quan H., Parsons G.A., Ghali W.A. Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CCM administrative data. Med Care 2002, 40:675-685.
11. Quach S., Blais C., Quan H. Administrative data have high variation in validity for recording heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2010, 26:306-312.
12. Vermeulen M.J., Tu J.V., Schull M.J. ICD-10 adaptations of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules performed as well as the original versions. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:971-974.
13. Lee D.S., Donovan L., Austin P.C., et al. Comparison of coding of heart failure and comorbidities in administrative and clinical data for use in outcomes research. Med Care 2005, 43:182-188.
14. Levy A.R., Tamblyn R.M., Fitchett D., et al. Coding accuracy of hospital discharge data for elderly survivors of myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiol 1999, 15:1277-1282.
15. Glance L.G., Osler T.M., Mukamel D.B., Dick A.W. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators. Med Care 2008, 46:112-119.
16. Quan H., Parsons G.A., Ghali W.A. Assessing accuracy of diagnosis-type indicators for flagging complications in administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57:366-372.
17. Gurevich Y., McFarlane A., Morris K., Jokovic A., Peterson G.M., Webster G.K. Estimating the number of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures in Canada: a comparison of cardiac registry and Canadian Institute for Health Information data sources. Can J Cardiol 2010, 26:e249-e253.
18. Li B., Evans D., Faris P., Dean S., Quan H. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:12.
19. So L., Evans D., Quan H. ICD-10 coding algorithms for defining comorbidities of acute myocardial infarction. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6:161.
20. Quan H., Li B., Saunders L.D., et al. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res 2008, 43:1424-1441.
21. Geraci J.M., Johnson M.L., Gordon H.S., et al. Mortality after cardiac bypass surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data. Med Care 2005, 43:149-158.