Estimating the number of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures in Canada: A comparison of cardiac registry and Canadian Institute for Health Information data sources

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2010, Pages

  Gurevich, Yana ^a   McFarlane, Anne ^a   Morris, Kathleen ^a   Jokovic, Aleksandra ^a   Peterson, Gail M ^a   Webster, Gregory K ^a  

^a CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH INFORMATION   (Canada)

Author keywords

Administrative data; Cardiac registries; Coronary artery bypass grafts; Health services research; Percutaneous coronary interventions; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CANADA; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES;

EID: 77956899448     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0828-282X(10)70416-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Heart Health Strategy and Action Plan: Building a heart healthy Canada. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2009.
2. Philpott AC, Southern DA, Clement FM, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving drug-eluting stents. CMAJ 2009;180:167-74.
3. Pate GE, Gao M, Ding L, Carere RG, Tyers FO, Hayden RI. Changing outcomes of coronary revascularization in British Columbia, 1995-2001. Can J Cardiol 2006;22:1197-203.
4. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al. Population rates of cardiac catheterization and yield of high-risk coronary artery disease. CMAJ 2005;73:35-9.
5. Humphries KH, Carere RG, Izadnegahdar M, Galbraith PD, Knudtson ML, Ghali WA. Cross-provincial use of cardiac services: The importance of data-sharing for clinical registries and outcomes research. Can J Cardiol 2005;21:267-72. (Pubitemid 40542368)
6. Thompson CR, Humphries KH, Gao M, et al. Revascularization use and survival outcomes after cardiac catheterization in British Columbia and Alberta. Can J Cardiol 2004;20:1417-23. (Pubitemid 40103645)
7. Pate GE, Humphries KH, Izadnegahdar M, Gao M, Kiely M, Carere RG. Population rates of invasive cardiac procedure in British Columbia, 1995 to 2001. Can J Cardiol 2004;20:712-6.
8. Faris PD, Grant FC, Galbraith PD, Gong Y, Ghali WA; Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization and revascularization rates for coronary heart disease. Can J Cardiol 2004;20:391-7.
9. Pilote L, Merrett P, Karp I, et al. Cardiac procedures after an acute myocardial infarction across nine Canadian provinces. Can J Cardiol 2005;20:491-500. (Pubitemid 38714681)
10. Kaul P, Saunders LD, Roos LL, et al. Trends in utilization of coronary artery bypass surgery and associated outcomes: Alberta, Manitoba, and Nova Scotia. Am J Med Qual 2002;17:103-12.
11. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Indicators 2009. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2009.
12. Tracey J, Zelmer J, Merid M, Boruvka A. Variation in heart attack mortality in Canada. Healthcare Quarterly 2006;9:23-5.
13. Roos LL, Sharp SM, Wajda A. Assessing data quality: A computerized approach. Soc Sci Med 1989;28:175-82. (Pubitemid 19031696)
14. Pink GH, Young W, Porter J, McKillop I. An evaluation of the quality of administrative data relating to hip and knee replacement surgery. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2000.
15. Canadian Institute for Health Information. CIHI data quality study of the 2005-2006 Discharge Abstract Database. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2009.
16. Juurlink D, Preyra C, Croxford R, et al. Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database: A validation study. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2006.
17. De Coster C, Li B, Quan H. Comparison and validity of procedures coded with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CA/CCI. Med Care 2008;46:627-34.
18. Quan H, Li B, Saunders LD, et al. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res 2008;43:1424-41. (Pubitemid 352019142)
19. Lopushinsky SR, Covarrubia KA, Rabeneck L, Austin PC, Urbach DR. Accuracy of administrative health data for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal diseases. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1733-7. (Pubitemid 47404096)
20. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data. Med Care 2004;42:801-9.