|
Volumn 891-892, Issue , 2012, Pages 109-112
|
Comparison of IMAC and MOAC for phosphopeptide enrichment by column chromatography
|
Author keywords
IMAC; LC MS MS; Phosphopeptide enrichment; TiO2
|
Indexed keywords
BINDING CAPACITIES;
COMPLEX MIXTURE;
IMAC;
IMMOBILIZED METAL AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY;
LC-MS/MS;
LIVER EXTRACT;
METAL OXIDES;
MOUSE LIVER;
PACKED COLUMN;
PHOSPHOPEPTIDE ENRICHMENT;
PHOSPHOPEPTIDES;
TIO;
TRIFLUOROACETIC ACIDS;
ACETIC ACID;
AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY;
LEACHING;
METALLIC COMPOUNDS;
PEPTIDES;
PH;
TITANIUM DIOXIDE;
ACETIC ACID;
ALBUMIN;
AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE;
BUFFER;
CASEIN;
FERRIC ION;
LIVER PROTEIN;
PHOSPHOPEPTIDE;
TITANIUM DIOXIDE;
TRIFLUOROACETIC ACID;
AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMICAL BINDING;
COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORROSION;
CULTURE AND TRANSPORT MEDIA;
ELUTION;
IMMOBILIZED METAL AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LEACHING;
METAL OXIDE AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY;
MOUSE;
NONHUMAN;
PH;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RUST FORMATION;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, AFFINITY;
PHOSPHOPEPTIDES;
TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;
|
EID: 84858615423
PISSN: 15700232
EISSN: 1873376X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.02.028 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (20)
|