The 'sleeper' issues before the supreme court as it reviews the affordable care act

Health Affairs

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 471-474

  Goldman, T R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; COURT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; JUSTICE; LAW; MEDICAID; NOTE; TAX;

HUMANS; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MEDICAID; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; STATE GOVERNMENT; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; TAXES; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSAL COVERAGE;

EID: 84858609045     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0132     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Goldman TR. Health reform gets its day in court-the Supreme one. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(1):8-11.
2. McConnell M, Severino C. If mandate dies, so should PPACA. Politico [serial on the Internet]. 2012 Jan 31 [cited 2012 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/72219.html
3. Sheils JF, Haught R. Without the individual mandate, the Affordable Care Act would still cover 23 million; premiums would rise less than predicted. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(11): 2177-85.
4. Rosenbaum S, Jost TS. All heat, no light-the states' Medicaid claims before the Supreme Court. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:487-9.