All heat, no light - The states' medicaid claims before the supreme court

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 366, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 487-489

  Rosenbaum, Sara ^a   Jost, Timothy Stoltzfus ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACT; AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; CHILD HEALTH CARE; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; JURISPRUDENCE; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MEDICAID; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTARY PROGRAM;

EID: 84856795587     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1114480     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Florida et al. v United States Department of Health and Human Services, Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Sept. 27, 2011), pp. 16-26.
2. South Dakota v Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987).
3. Florida et al. v United States Department of Health and Human Services, 648 F 3d 1235 (Eleventh Cir., 2011), pp. 1265-6.
4. Cohen IG, Blumstein JF. The constitutionality of the ACA's Medicaid-expansion mandate. N Engl J Med 2011. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1113416.
5. 42 U.S.C. §1304.