A Continuum in French Children's Surface Realization of Auxiliaries

Little Words: Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, and Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 237-246

  Dye, Cristina D ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858447665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Bottari, Piero, Paolo Cipriani, and Ana Maria Chilosi. 1993/1994. Proto-syntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition 3:327-69.
2. Bowerman, Melissa. 1973. Early syntactic development: A cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Braine, Martin. 1963. The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language 39:1-13.
4. Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Carter, Allyson, and LouAnn Gerken. 2004. Do children's omissions leave traces? Journal of Child Language 31:561-86.
6. Christofidou, Anastasia, and Ionna Kappa 1998. Pre- and proto-morphological fillers in Greek language acquisition. Studies in the acquisition of number and diminutive marking: Antwerp papers in linguistics 95:193-214.
7. Clark, Eve. 1985. The acquisition of Romance with special reference to French. In The Cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 1, The data, ed. Dan I. Slobin, 687-782. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Demuth, Katherine. 1992. Accessing functional categories in Sesotho. In The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, ed. Jurgen Meisel, 83-107. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Demuth, Katherine, and Annie Tremblay. 2007. Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language 34:1-29.
10. Dye, Cristina D. 2005. Identifying auxiliaries in first language acquisition: Evidence from a new child French corpus. PhD diss., Cornell University.
11. Dye, Cristina D., Claire Foley, Maria Blume, and Barbara Lust. 2004. Mismatches between morphology and syntax in first language acquisition suggest a "syntax first" model. Online Proceedings of BUCLD 28. www.bu.edu/linguistics/APPLIED/BUCLD/supp.html (accessed October 13, 2008).
12. Echols, Catharine H. 1993. A perceptually based model of children's earliest productions. Cognition 46:245-96.
13. Gerken, LouAnn, Barbara Landau, and Robert Remez. 1990. Function morphemes in young children's speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology 26 (2): 204-16.
14. Gleitman, Lila. 1981. Maturational determinants of language growth. Cognition 10:103-14.
15. Gleitman, Lila, and Eric Wanner. 1982. The state of the art. In Language acquisition: The state of the art, ed. Eric Wanner and Lila Gleitman, 3-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hoekstra, Teun, and Nina Hyams. 1999. The eventivity constraint and modal reference effects in root infinitives. Proceedings of BUCLD 23, 240-52. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
17. Höhle, Barbara, Jurgen Weisseborn, Dorothea Keifer, Antje Schultz, and Michaela Schmitz. 2004. Functional elements in infants' speech processing: The role of determiners in syntactic categorization of lexical elements. Infancy 5 (3): 341-53.
18. Jones, Michael A. 1996. Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kedar, Yarden, Marianella Casasola, and Barbara Lust. 2006. Getting there faster: 18-and 24-month-old infants' use of function words to determine reference. Child Development 77 (2): 25-338.
20. Lust, Barbara. 1999. Universal grammar: The strong continuity hypothesis in first language acquisition. In Handbook of child language acquisition, ed. W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia, 111-56. New York: Academic Press.
21. Lust, Barbara. 2006. Child language: Acquisition and growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lust, Barbara, Maria Blume, and Tina Ogden. Forthcoming. Cornell University virtual linguistics lab research methods manual: Scientific methods for the study of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Pepinsky, Thomas, Katherine Demuth, and Brian Roark. 2001. The status of "filler syllables" in children's early speech. In Proceedings of BUCLD 25, 575-86. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
24. Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
25. Schlyter, Suzanne. 2003. Development of verb morphology and finiteness in children and adults acquiring French. In Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition, ed. Christine Dimroth and Marianne Starren, 15-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Schutze, Carson, and Ken Wexler. 1996. Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In Proceedings of BUCLD 20, 670-81. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
27. Shi, Rushen, James Morgan, and Paul Allopena. 1998. Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language 25:169-201.
28. Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Veneziano, Eddy, and Hermine Sinclair. 2000. The changing status of "filler syllables" on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27:461-500.
30. Whitman, John, Kwee-Ock Lee, and Barbara Lust. 1991. Continuity of the principles of universal grammar in first language acquisition: The issue of functional categories. In Proceedings of NELS 21, 383-97. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
31. Wijnen, Frank. 1996/1997. Temporal reference and eventivity in root infinitives. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 12:1-2.