Make a gesture and I will tell you what you are miming. Pantomime recognition in healthy subjects

Cortex

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 584-592

  Osiurak, François ^a   Jarry, Christophe ^b,c   Baltenneck, Nicolas ^d   Boudin, Bertrand ^d   Le Gall, Didier ^b,c  

^a Lyon University   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

^c ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Action; Apraxia; Movement; Observation; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMITATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PANTOMIME; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; FEMALE; GESTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858445648     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bekkering A., Wohlschläger A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:153-164.
2. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor Apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 2001, 7(6):445-448.
3. Buxbaum L.J., Giovannetti T., Libon D. The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: Evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44(2):166-191.
4. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25(1):226-239.
5. Clark M.A., Merians A.S., Kothari A., Poizner H., Macauley B., Rothi L.J.G., et al. Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 1994, 117(5):1093-1106.
6. Dumont C., Ska B. Pantomime recognition impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Cognition 2000, 43:177-181.
7. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(6):1449-1559.
8. Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin: The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33(1):63-72.
9. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. The meaning of meaningless gestures: A study of visuo-imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(3):333-341.
10. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36(7):581-589.
11. Goldenberg G., Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009, 132(6):1645-1655.
12. Heilman K.M. Ideational apraxia. A re-definition. Brain 1973, 96(4):861-864.
13. Heilman K.M., Rothi L.J., Valenstein E. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 1982, 32(4):342-346.
14. Heilman K.M., Watson R.T. The disconnection apraxias. Cortex 2008, 44(8):975-982.
15. Heyes C.M. Social learning in animals: Categories and mechanisms. Biological Reviews 1994, 69:207-231.
16. Köhler W. The Mentality of Apes 1959, Vintage Books, New York.
17. Le Gall D. Apraxies idéo-motrice et idéatoire: Revue critique de la littérature. Revue de Neuropsychologie 1992, 2:325-371.
18. Liepmann H. Drei aufsatze aus dem apraxiegebiet 1908, Krager, Berlin.
19. Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Zadini A., Ulkmar M., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24:795-816.
20. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Conceptual apraxia in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 1992, 115(4):1061-1071.
21. Osiurak F., Aubin G., Allain P., Jarry C., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Richard I., et al. Different constraints on grip selection in brain-damaged patients. Object use versus object transport. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(9):2431-2434.
22. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Allain P., Aubin G., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Richard I., et al. Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage. The technical reasoning model. Cortex 2009, 45(6):769-783.
23. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Allain P., Aubin G., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Richard I., et al. Des troubles praxiques aux troubles techniques. Une étude de deux cas. Revue de Neuropsychologie 2007, 17:231-259.
24. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Le Gall D. Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning. Toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychological Review 2010, 117(2):517-540.
25. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Le Gall D. Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis. New perspectives on apraxia of tool use. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(3):299-312.
26. Poeck K. The clinical examination for motor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24:129-134.
27. Poizner H., Merians A.S., Clark M., Macauley B., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Left hemisphere specialization for learned, skilled, and purposeful action. Neuropsychology 1998, 12:163-182.
28. Rothi L.J., Heilman K.M., Watson R.T. Pantomime comprehension and ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985, 48(3):207-210.
29. Rothi L.J., Mack L., Heilman K.M. Pantomine agnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1986, 49(4):451-454.
30. Rothi L.J.G., Mack L., Verfaellie M., Brown P., Heilman K.M. Ideomotor apraxia: Error pattern analysis. Aphasiology 1988, 2(3-4):381-388.
31. Rothi L.J.G., Ochipa C., Heilman K.M. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:443-458.
32. Roy E.A., Heath M., Westwood D., Schweizer T.A., Dixon M.J., Black S.E., et al. Task demands and limb apraxia in stroke. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44(2):253-279.
33. Tate R.L., McDonald S. What is apraxia? The clinician's dilemma. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1995, 5(4):273-297.
34. Tennie C., Call J., Tomasello M. Push or pull: Imitation vs. emulation in great apes and human children. Ethology 2006, 112(12):1159-1169.
35. Tomasello M., Davis-Dasilva M., Camak L., Bard K. Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees. Human Evolution 1987, 2(2):175-183.
36. Wohlschläger A., Gattis M., Bekkering H. Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 2003, 358B:501-515.