The systemic, long-run relation among gasoline demand, gasoline price, income, and vehicle ownership in OECD countries: Evidence from panel cointegration and causality modeling

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 327-331

  Liddle, Brantley ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Car ownership; Gasoline consumption in OECD countries; Gasoline demand elasticities

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ELASTICITY;

CAR OWNERSHIP; CAUSALITY MODELING; GASOLINE CONSUMPTION IN OECD COUNTRIES; GASOLINE DEMAND; GASOLINE DEMAND ELASTICITIES; INCOME ELASTICITIES; PANEL CO INTEGRATIONS; VEHICLE OWNERSHIP;

GASOLINE;

CAR OWNERSHIP; COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; DEMAND ANALYSIS; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; OECD; PANEL DATA; PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON;

EID: 84858436040     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bonilla D., Foxon T. Demand for new car fuel economy in the UK, 1970-2005. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2009, 43:55-83.
2. Brons M., Nijkamp P., Pels E., Rietveld P. A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energy Economics 2007, 30:2105-2122.
3. Choi I. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 2001, 20:249-272.
4. Engle R., Granger C. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
5. Graham D., Glaister S. The demand for automobile fuel: a survey of elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2002, 36:1-26.
6. Granger C. Forecasting in Business and Economics 1980, Academic Press, New York.
7. Hughes J., Knittel C., Daniel S. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. Energy Journal 2008, 29:113-134.
8. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 2003, 115:53-74.
9. Kao C., Chaing M. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics 2000, 15:179-222.
10. Liddle B. Long-run relationship among transport demand, income, and gasoline price for the US. Transportation Research Part D 2009, 14:73-82.
11. Maddala G.S., Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:631-652.
12. Mark N.C., Sul D. Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long-run money demand. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2003, 65:655-680.
13. Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:653-670.
14. Pedroni P. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics 2000, 15:93-130.
15. Pedroni P. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics 2001, 83:727-731.
16. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 2004, 20:597-625.
17. Pesaran M. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2007, 22:265-312.
18. Pock M. Gasoline demand in Europe: new insights. Energy Economics 2010, 32:54-62.
19. Small K., van Dender K. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. The Energy Journal 2007, 28:25-51.
20. Westerlund J. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2007, 69:709-748.