Long-run relationship among transport demand, income, and gasoline price for the US

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 73-82

  Liddle, Brantley ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

CAFE program; Cointegration; Energy consumption and development; Granger causality; Transport demand

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE FUELS; CARBON; CRASHWORTHINESS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FLEET OPERATIONS; FUELS; GASOLINE; PUBLIC POLICY; STANDARDS; TRANSPORTATION;

CAFE PROGRAM; COINTEGRATION; EFFICIENCY STANDARDS; FLEET FUEL ECONOMY; GRANGER CAUSALITY; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; TRANSPORT DEMAND; VEHICLE OWNERSHIP;

FUEL ECONOMY;

CAR OWNERSHIP; COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ENERGY USE; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58349097541     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2008.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akarca A.T., and Long T.V. On the relationship between energy and GNP: reexamination. Journal of Energy and Development 5 (1980) 326-331
2. Akinboade O., Ziramba E., and Kumo W. The demand for gasoline in South Africa: an empirical analysis using cointegration techniques. Energy Economics 30 (2008) 3222-3229
3. Alves D., and De Losso da Silveria Bueno R. Short-run, long-run and cross elasticities of gasoline demand in Brazil. Energy Economics 25 (2003) 191-199
4. American Automobile Association (Various years). Your Driving Costs, Heathrow.
5. Ben-David D., Lumsdaine R., and Papell D. Unit roots, postwar slowdowns and long-run growth: evidence for two structural breaks. Empirical Economics 28 (2003) 303-319
6. Bentzen J. An empirical analysis of gasoline demand in Denmark using cointegration techniques. Energy Economics 16 (1994) 139-143
7. Dahl C., and Sterner T. Analyzing gasoline demand elasticities: a survey. Energy Economics 3 (1991) 203-210
8. Davis S.C. Transportation Energy Data Book. 17th ed. (1997), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge
9. De Vita G., Endresen K., and Hunt L.C. An empirical analysis of energy demand in Namibia. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3447-3463
10. Elliott G., Rothenberg T.J., and Stock J.H. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64 (1996) 813-836
11. Engle R.F., and Granger C.W.J. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55 (1987) 251-276
12. Ewing R., Bartholomew K., Winkelman S., Walters J., and Chen D. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change (2007), Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC
13. Graham D., and Glaister S. The demand for automobile fuel: a survey of elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36 (2002) 1-26
14. Granger C. Forecasting in Business and Economics (1980), Academic Press, New York
15. Hall A. Testing for a unit root in time series with pretest data-based model selection. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12 (1994) 461-470
16. Hughes J., Knittel C., and Daniel S. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. Energy Journal 29 (2008) 113-134
17. Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12 (1988) 231-254
18. Johnston, L.D., Williamson, S.H., 2008. What was the US GDP then? Measuring Worth. .
19. Kraft J., and Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GDP. Journal of Energy and Development 3 (1978) 401-403
20. Liddle B. Demographic dynamics and per capita environmental impact: using panel regressions and household decompositions to examine population and transport. Population and Environment 26 (2004) 23-39
21. Liddle B. How linked are energy and GDP: reconsidering energy-GDP cointegration and causality for disaggregated OECD Country data. International Journal of Energy, Environment and Economics 13 (2006) 97-113
22. Maddala G.S., and Kim I. Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Murrell, J.D., Hellman, K.H., Heavenrich, R.M., 1993. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends Through 1993, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources, Ann Arbor.
24. National Research Council, 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
25. Polemis M. Empirical assessment of the determinants of road energy demand in Greece. Energy Economics 28 (2006) 385-403
26. Polzin S., and Chu X. A closer look at public transportation mode share trends. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 8 (2005) 41-53
27. Stern D.I. Energy use and economic growth in the USA, a multivariate approach. Energy Economics 15 (1993) 137-150
28. Stern D.I. A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Economics 22 (2000) 267-283
29. Yu E.S.H., and Hwang B.K. The relationship between energy and GNP: further results. Energy Economics 6 (1984) 186-190
30. Zivot E., and Andrews D.W.K. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (1992) 251-270