Informed consent and decision-making about adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review of empirical research

Transplantation

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1285-1296

  Gordon, Elisa J ^a   Daud, Amna ^a   Caicedo, Juan Carlos ^b   Cameron, Kenzie A ^a   Jay, Colleen ^b   Fryer, Jonathan ^b   Beauvais, Nicole ^b   Skaro, Anton ^b   Baker, Talia ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult to adult living donor liver transplantation; Attitudes; Decision making; Ethics; Informed consent; Liver donation; Outcomes; Survey; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CULTURAL FACTOR; EMOTIONALITY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; ORGAN DONOR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; ETHICS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84858421570     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823817d5     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Shapiro RS, Adams M. Ethical issues surrounding adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2000; 6(6 suppl 2): S77.
2. Nadalin S, Malago M, Radtke A, et al. Current trends in live liver donation. Transpl Int 2007; 20: 312.
3. United Network for Organ Sharing/OPTN. U.S. Liver transplants performed January 1, 1988-December 31, 2010. Based onOPTNdata as of March 18, 2011. Accessed March 29, 2011.
4. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Waiting list candidates: Liver, 2011, data as of May 4, 2009. Available at: http://www.optn.org. Accessed November 7, 2011.
5. Trotter JF. Living donor liver transplantation: Is the hype over? J Hepatol 2005; 42: 20.
6. Kowalczyk L. At the Lahey, a stunning, rare tragedy: Donor dies in liver transplant attempt. The Boston Globe June 12, 2010.
7. Ratner L, Sandoval P. When disaster strikes: Death of a living organ donor. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2577.
8. Reis S, Hermoni D, Van-Raalte R, et al. Aggregation of qualitative studies-From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 214.
9. Miller CM. Regulation and oversight of adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9(10 suppl 2): S69.
10. Ghobrial RM, Freise CE, Trotter JF, et al. Donor morbidity after living donation for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 468.
11. Beavers KL, Sandler RS, Fair JH, et al. The living donor experience: Donor health assessment and outcomes after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2001; 7: 943.
12. Chen SC, Hsu HT, Hwang SL, et al. Attitude toward living donor liver transplantation in Taiwan. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 2108.
13. Diaz GC, Renz JF, Mudge C, et al. Donor health assessment after livingdonor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 120.
14. Erim Y, Beckmann M, Valentin-Gamazo C, et al. Selection of donors for adult living-donor liver donation: Results of the assessment of the first 205 donor candidates. Psychosomatics 2008; 49: 143.
15. Fujita M, Akabayashi A, Slingsby BT, et al.Amodel of donors' decisionmaking in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in Japan: Having no choice. Liver Transpl 2006; 12: 768.
16. Karliova M, Malago M, Valentin-Gamazo C, et al. Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1799.
17. Lee SH, Jeong JS, Ha HS, et al. Decision-related factors and attitudes toward donation in living related liver transplantation: Ten-year experience. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 1081.
18. Kim-Schluger L, Florman SS, Schiano T, et al. Quality of life after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1593.
19. Erim Y, Beckmann M, Kroencke S, et al. Sense of coherence and social support predict living liver donors' emotional stress prior to livingdonor liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2008; 22: 273.
20. Walter M, Papachristou C, Danzer G, et al. Willingness to donate: An interview study before liver transplantation. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 544.
21. Erim Y, Beckmann M, Valentin-Gamazo C, et al. Quality of life and psychiatric complications after adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2006; 12: 1782.
22. Hayashi A, Noma S, Uehara M, et al. Relevant factors to psychological status of donors before living-related liver transplantation. Transplantation 2007; 84: 1255.
23. Fujita M, Slingsby BT, Akabayashi A. Three patterns of voluntary consent in the case of adult-to-adult living related liver transplantation in Japan. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 1425.
24. Cabello CC, Smolowitz J. Roller coaster marathon: Being a live liver donor. Prog Transplant 2008; 18: 185.
25. McGregor LM, Swanson V, Hayes PC, et al. Considering adult living donor liver transplantation: A qualitative study of patients and their potential donors. Psychol Health 2010; 25: 751.
26. Papachristou C, Walter M, Frommer J, et al. Decision-making and risk-assessment in living liver donation: How informed is the informed consent of donors? A qualitative study. Psychosomatics 2010; 51: 312.
27. Kusakabe T, Irie S, Ito N, et al. Feelings of living donors about adultto- adult living donor liver transplantation. Gastroenterol Nurs 2008; 31: 263.
28. Chisuwa H, Hashikura Y, Mita A, et al. Living liver donation: Preoperative assessment, anatomic considerations, and long-term outcome. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1670.
29. Winsett RP, Russell C, Grewal HP, et al. Perceptions of the donation process from adult-to-adult living liver donors. Prog Transplant 2003; 13: 123.
30. Rudow DL, Chariton M, Sanchez C, et al. Kidney and liver living donors: A comparison of experiences. Prog Transplant 2005; 15: 185.
31. Verna EC, Hunt KH, Renz JF, et al. Predictors of candidate maturation among potential living donors. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2549.
32. Erim Y, Beckmann M, Kroencke S, et al. Psychological strain in urgent indications for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2007; 13: 886.
33. Walter M, Dammann G, Kuchenhoff J, et al. Psychosocial situation of living donors: Moods, complaints, and self-image before and after liver transplantation. Med Sci Monit 2005; 11: CR503.
34. Araujo CC, Balbi E, Pacheco-Moreira LF, et al. Evaluation of living donor liver transplantation: Causes for exclusion. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 424.
35. Trotter JF, Wisniewski KA, Terrault NA, et al. Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Hepatology 2007; 46: 1476.
36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 42 CFR parts 405, 482, 488, and 498 Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: Requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ trans-plants; final rule. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CertificationandComplianc/downloads/Transplantfinal.pdf 2007. Accessed November 23, 2009.
37. Surman O, Fukunishi I, Allen T, et al. Live organ donation: Social context, clinical encounter, and the psychology of communication. Psychosomatics 2005; 46: 1.
38. Gordon EJ, Levin, B.W. Contextualizing ethical dilemmas: Ethnographic methods in bioethics. In: Jacoby L, Siminoff LA, eds. Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer. Elsevier, New York 2008, p 83.
39. Dahlke MH, Popp FC, Eggert N, et al. Differences in attitude toward living and postmortal liver donation in the United States, Germany, and Japan. Psychosomatics 2005; 46: 58.
40. Fink A, Prochazka A, Henderson W, et al. Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 919.
41. Fink A, Prochazka A, Henderson W, et al. Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 27.
42. Brown R, Shuk E, Leighl N, et al. Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: Development of a question prompt list. Support Care Cancer 2010.
43. Lutz G, Butzlaff M, Atlas S, et al. The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 740.
44. Ong J, Miller P, Appleby R, et al. Effect of a preoperative instructional digital video disc on patient knowledge and preparedness for engaging in postoperative care activities. Nurs Clin North Am 2009; 44: 103-115, xii.
45. Yee A, Adjei N, Do J, et al. Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 1154.
46. Leclercq W, Keulers B, Scheltinga M, et al. A review of surgical informed consent: Past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1406.
47. Shelton D. Living kidney donors push for better data on risks. Available at: www.chicagotribune.com/health/ct-met-living-donor-risks-20110731,0,7795430. story. Chicago Tribune July 31, 2011.
48. National Institutes of Health. NIH science of behavior change meeting summary. National Institutes of Health Science of Behavior Change, Bethesda, MD, 2009.
49. Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, et al. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: A systematic review. Med Decis Making 2011; 31: 151.
50. Gaston C, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Social Sci Med 2005; 61: 2252.
51. Agre P, Kurtz R, Krauss B. A randomized trial using videotape to present consent information for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 271.
52. Mason V, McEwan A, Walker D, et al. The use of video information in obtaining consent for female sterilisation: A randomised study. BJOG 2003; 110: 1062.
53. Cull A, Miller H, Porterfield T, et al. The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling:Arandomised evaluation study. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 830.
54. Fisher L, Rowley P, Lipkin MJ. Genetic counseling for beta-thalassemia trait following health screening in a health maintenance organization: Comparison of programmed and conventional counseling. Am J Human Genet 1981; 33: 987.
55. Beamond B, Beischer A, Brodsky J, et al. Improvement in surgical consent with a preoperative multimedia patient education tool: A pilot study. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30: 619.
56. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: New health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2001.
57. DeWalt D, Callahan L, Hawk V, et al. Health literacy universal precautions toolkit. Prepared by North Carolina Network Consortium, The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, under Contract No. HHSA290200710014. AHRQ Publication No. 10-0046-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 2010.
58. Improving patient safety through informed consent for patients with limited health literacy-An implementation report. National Quality Forum, Washington, DC 2005 Document no. NQFIR-01-05. 2005.
59. Gordon E, Bergeron A, McNatt G, et al. Are informed consent forms for organ transplantation and donation too difficult to read? Clin Transplant [published online ahead of print May 17, 2011] doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011. 01480.x.
60. Ventura K. Ethical considerations in live liver donation to children. Prog Transplant 2010; 20: 186.
61. Flaherty RJ. A simple method for evaluating the clinical literature. Fam Pract Manag 2004; 11: 47.
62. Heller RF, Verma A, Gemmell I, et al. Critical appraisal for public health: A new checklist. Public Health 2008; 122: 92.
63. Services. CUI. Critical Appraisal of Healthcare Literature. 2004.
64. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349.