MUPEMURE: Towards a model of computer-supported collaborative learning with multiple representations

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conf. Proc. - Community Events Proceedings, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conf.

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1065-1072

  Bodemer, Daniel ^a   Kapur, Manu ^b   Molinari, Gaëlle ^c   Rummel, Nikol ^d   Bodeme, Daniel ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^e   Westermann, Katharina ^d   Lund, Kristine ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c Distance Learning University Switzerland   (Switzerland)

^d RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^e SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; MULTIPLE EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS; MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES; MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION;

NAVIGATION; RESEARCH;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84858405831     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Ainsworth, S. E. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
2. Ainsworth, S.E. & Loizou, A.T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams, Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
3. Bodemer, D. (2011). Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1079-1086.
4. Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011). Group Awareness in CSCL Environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1043-1045.
5. Bodemer, D., & Faust, U. (2006). External and mental referencing of multiple representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 27-42. (Pubitemid 41394956)
6. Bodemer, D., Plötzner, R., Feuerlein, I. & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 325-341. (Pubitemid 39216292)
7. Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 123-139.
8. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. (2007). Perspectives on collaboration scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge * cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
9. Horton, P. B., McConny, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111.
10. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
11. Kapur, M. (2009). Productive Failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523-550.
12. Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2009). The assistance dilemma in CSCL. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices - CSCL2009 Community Events Proceedings, Vol 2 (pp. 37-42). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
13. Kozma, R. (2003). Material and Social Affordances of Multiple Representations for Science Understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226. (Pubitemid 36280163)
14. Lund, K., Molinari, G., Séjourné, A., & Baker, M. (2007). How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 273-295.
15. Molinari, G., Sangin, M., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Effects of knowledge interdependence with the partner on visual and action transactivity in collaborative concept mapping. In G. Kanselaar, J. van Merriënboer, P. Kirschner, & T. de Jong, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008): Part 2 (pp. 91-98). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ISLS.
16. Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239-252.
17. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276.
18. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241. (Pubitemid 40551445)
19. Rummel, N. & Westermann, K. (2010). A Matter of Where and When: Providing Collaboration Support and Delaying Content-Related Support. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2010. Denver, Colorado, USA.
20. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in teaming from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156. (Pubitemid 36280159)
21. Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2008). External and internal representations in the acquisition and use of knowledge: visualization effects on mental model construction. Instructional Science, 36, 175-190.
22. Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Jaspers, J. G. M., & Janssen, J. (2010). Guiding students' online complex learning-task behavior through representational scripting. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 927-939.
23. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 183-218. (Pubitemid 36539896)
24. van Bruggen, J., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121-138. (Pubitemid 39659599)
25. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K. & Fischer, F. (2010) Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not), Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506-515.
26. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416-426.