A dual task priming investigation of right hemisphere inhibition for people with left hemisphere lesions

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Volumn 8, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Smith Conway, Erin R ^a   Chenery, Helen J ^b   Angwin, Anthony J ^b   Copland, David A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY LOAD; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL FIELD; WORD RECOGNITION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN INFARCTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; AGED; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL INHIBITION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84858379944     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17449081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-14     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Joanette Y, Goulet P, Hannequin D. Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication 1990, New York: Springer.
2. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 1970, 33:193-201.
3. Chiarello C, Maxfield L. Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down. Brain Cogn 1996, 30:81-108. 10.1006/brcg.1996.0006, 8811982.
4. Moscovitch M. Stages of processing and hemispheric differences in language in the normal subject. Psychobiology of Language 1983, 88-104. Cambridge: The MIT Press, Studdert-Kennedy M, [Caplan D (Series Editor) MIT Press Studies in Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics].
5. Querne L, Eustache F, Faure S. Interhemispheric inhibition, intrahemispheric activation, and lexical capacities of the right hemisphere: A tachistoscopic, divided visual-field study in normal subjects. Brain Lang 2000, 74:171-190. 10.1006/brln.2000.2333, 10950913.
6. Hutner N, Liederman J. Right hemisphere participation in reading. Brain Lang 1991, 41:475-495. 10.1016/0093-934X(91)90169-2, 1777809.
7. Belin P, Van Eeckhout P, Zilbovicius M, Remy P, Francois C, Guillaume S, Chain F, Rancurel G, Samson Y. Recovery from nonfluent aphasia afer melodic intonation therapy: a PET study. Neurology 1996, 47:1504-1511. 10.1212/WNL.47.6.1504, 8960735.
8. Heiss WD, Thiel A. A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia. Brain Lang 2006, 98:118-123. 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.002, 16564566.
9. Rosen HJ, Petersen SE, Linenweber MR, Snyder AZ, White DA, Chapman L, Dromerick AW, Fiez JA, Corbetta M. Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex. Neurology 2000, 55:1883-1894. 10.1212/WNL.55.12.1883, 11134389.
10. Saur D, Baumgaertner A, Lange R, Schraknepper V, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Dynamics of reorganisation in the language system after stroke: an fMRI follow-up study from acute to the chronic phase. Brain Lang 2005, 95:8-9. 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.006, 16392156.
11. Thiel A, Schumacher B, Wienhard K, Gairing S, Kracht LW, Wagner R, Haupt WF, Heiss WD. Direct demonstration of transcallosal disinhibition in language networks. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006, 26:1122-1127.
12. Thulborn KR, Carpenter PA, Just MA. Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke 1999, 30:749-754. 10.1161/01.STR.30.4.749, 10187873.
13. Ansaldo AI, Arguin M. The recovery from aphasia depends on both the left and right hemispheres: three longitudinal case studies on the dynamics of language function after aphasia. Brain Lang 2003, 87:177-178.
14. Ansaldo AI, Arguin M, Lecours AR. The contribution of the right cerebral hemisphere to the recovery from aphasia: a single longitudinal case study. Brain Lang 2002, 82:206-222. 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00017-2, 12096877.
15. Ansaldo AI, Arguin M, Lecours AR. Initial right hemisphere take-over and subsequent bilateral participation during recovery from aphasia. Aphasiology 2002, 16:287-304.
16. Koivisto M. Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:497-504. 10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00100-5, 9106278.
17. Fassbinder W, Tompkins CA. Hemispheric differences in word-meaning processing: alternative interpretations of current evidence. Aphasiology 2006, 20:110-122. 10.1080/02687030500472397, 2801904, 20054427.
18. Chiarello C, Liu S, Shears C, Quan N, Kacinik N. Priming of strong semantic relations in the left and right visual fields: a time-course investigation. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:721-732. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00220-8, 12591029.
19. Chiarello C, Burgess C, Richards L, Pollock A. Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: some words do, some words don't... sometimes, some places. Brain Lang 1990, 38:75-104. 10.1016/0093-934X(90)90103-N, 2302547.
20. Audet C, Driessen N, Burgess C. Evaluating semantic neighbourhood effects in categorical and locative priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Brain Cogn 1998, 37:67-69.
21. Moss H, Ostrin RK, Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson W. Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: evidence from priming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1995, 21:863-883.
22. Abernethy M, Coney J. Associative priming in the hemispheres as a function of SOA. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:1397-1409. 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90106-A, 8127435.
23. Bouaffre S, Faita-Ainseba F. Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain Cogn 2007, 63:123-135. 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.006, 17207563.
24. Deacon D, Grose-Fifer J, Yang C-M, Stanick V, Hewitt S, Dynowska A. Evidence for a new conceptualization of semantic representation on the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Cortex 2004, 40:467-478. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70140-0, 15259327.
25. Abernethy M, Coney J. Semantic category priming in the left cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 1996, 34:339-350. 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00144-1, 9148190.
26. Collins M. Differences in semantic category priming in the left and right cerebral hemispheres under automatic and controlled processing conditions. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:1071-1085. 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00156-0, 10468370.
27. Koivisto M. Categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres: automatic in the left hemisphere, postlexical in the right hemisphere?. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:661-668. 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00147-4, 9723937.
28. Koivisto M, Laine M. Hemispheric asymmetries in activation and integration of categorical information. Laterality 2000, 5:1-21.
29. Faure S, Blanc-Garin J. Right hemisphere semantic performance and competence in a case of partial interhemispheric disconnection. Brain Lang 1994, 47:557-581. 10.1006/brln.1994.1059, 7859055.
30. Landis T, Regard M. The right hemisphere's access to lexical meaning: a function of its release from left-hemisphere control?. Right Hemisphere Contributions to Lexical Semantics 1988, 33-46. New York: Springer, Chiarello C.
31. Landis T, Regard M, Graves R, Goodglass H. Semantic paralexia: a release of right hemispheric function from left hemispheric control?. Neuropsychologia 1983, 21:359-364. 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90022-2, 6621864.
32. Friedman A, Polson MC. Hemispheres as independent resource systems: limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1981, 7:1031-1058.
33. Crosson B, Moore AB, Gopinath K, White KD, Wierenga CE, Gaiefsky ME, Fabrizio KS, Peck KK, Soltysik D, Milsted C, et al. Role of the right and left hemispheres in recovery of function during treatment of intention in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17:392-406. 10.1162/0898929053279487, 15814000.
34. Crosson B, Fabrizio KS, Singletary F, Cato MA, Wierenga CE, Parkinson RB, Sherod ME, Moore AB, Ciampitti M, Holiway B, et al. Treatment of naming in nonfluent aphasia thrugh manipulation of intention and attention: a phase 1 comparison of two novel treatments. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007, 13:582-594.
35. Dotson VM, Singletary F, Fuller R, Koehler S, Moore AB, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Crosson B. Treatment of word-finding deficits in fluent aphasia through the manipulation of spatial attention: preliminary findings. Aphasiology 2008, 22:103-113.
36. Neely JH. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: a selective review of current findings and theories. Basic Processing in Reading Visual Word Recognition 1991, 264-336. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Besner D, Humphreys GW.
37. Chiarello C, Richards L. Another look at categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 1992, 30:381-392. 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90111-X, 1603301.
38. Neely JH, Keefe DE. Semantic context effects on visual word processing: a hybrid prospective-retrospective processing theory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 1989, 24:207-248. New York: Academic, Bower GH.
39. Abernethy M, Coney J. Semantic and phonemic priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:933-945. 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90109-2, 2259425.
40. Hagoort P, Brown CM, Swaab TY. Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain 1996, 119:627-649. 10.1093/brain/119.2.627, 8800953.
41. Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery 1982, United States: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
42. Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test 2001, San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
43. Hunt KP, Hodge MH. Category-item and category-name meaningfulness (m'): taxonomic norms for 84 categories. Psychon Monogr Suppl 1971, 4:97-121.
44. Shapiro SI, Palermo D. Conceptual organization and class membership: normative data for representatives of 100 categories. Psychon Monogr Suppl 1970, 3:107-127.
45. Edinburgh Associative Thesaurus. , http://www.eat.rl.ac.uk/
46. Marshall GR, Cofer CN. Single-word free-association norms for 328 responses from the connecticut cultural norms for verbal items in categories. Norms of Word Association 1970, 321-360. New York: Academic, Postman L, Keppel G.
47. Miller KM. Free-association responses of English and Australian students to 100 words from Kent-Rosanoff word association test. Norms of Word Association 1970, New York: Academic, Postman L, Keppel G.
48. Moss H, Older L. Birkbeck Word Association Norms 1996, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
49. Nelson DL, McEvoy CL, Schreiber TA. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, (36):402-407.
50. Thomson DM, Meredith SG, Browning CJ. Monash Free Association Norms 1976, Melbourne: Monash University.
51. Kucera H, Francis WN. Computational Analysis of Present-day American English 1967, Providence: Brown University Press.
52. Gilhooly KJ, Logie RH. Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words. Behav Res Methods Instrum 1980, 12:395-427.
53. Pavio A, Yuille JC, Madigan SA. Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 words. J Exp Psychol Monogr Suppl 1968, 76:1-25.
54. Toglia MP, Battig WR. Handbook of Semantic Word Norms 1978, New York: Erlbaum.
55. The English Lexicon Project A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. The English Lexicon Project., http://elexicon.wustl.edu/
56. Chiarello C. Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: automatic and controlled priming. Brain Lang 1985, 26:146-172. 10.1016/0093-934X(85)90034-3, 4052742.
57. Brysbaert M. "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Some simple SPSS solutions to a complex problem (Version 2.0) 2007, Royal Holloway: University of London.
58. Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging 2002, 17:85-100.
59. Abbassi E, Joanette Y. The time course of access to semantic information in high-performing older adults: Behavioural evidence for the hemispehric asymmetry reduction in older individuals. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2011, 18:452-470.
60. Salthouse TA. Working memory as a processing resource in cognitive aging. Dev Rev 1990, 10:101-124.
61. Stoltzfus ER, Hasher L, Zacks RT. Working memory and aging: Current status of the inhibitory view. Working Memory and Human Cognition 1996, 66-88. New York: Oxford University Press, Richardson JTE.
62. Craik FIM, Byrd M. Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. Aging and cognitive processes 1982, 191-211. New York: Plenum Press, Craik FIM, Trehub S.
63. Hasher L, Zacks RT. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The psychology of learning and motivation 1988, 22:193-225. San Diego: Academic, Bower GH.
64. Lustig C, Hasher L, Zacks RT. Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view". The place of inhibition in cognition 2007, 145-162. Washington: American Psychological Association, Gorfein DS, MacLeod CM.
65. Gerard L, Zacks RT, Hasher L, Radvansky GA. Age deficits in retrieval: the fan effect. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 1991, 46:P131-P136.
66. Hellige JB, Cox PJ. Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1976, 2:210-221.
67. Anderson ND, Iidaka T, Cabeza R, Kapur S, McIntosh AR, Craik FIM. The effects of divided attention on encoding- and retrieval-related brain activity: a PET study of younger and older adults. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12:775-792. 10.1162/089892900562598, 11054920.
68. Craik FIM. On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1983, 302:341-359.
69. Reuter-Lorenz PA. New visions of the aging mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2002, 6:394-400. 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01957-5, 12200182.
70. Ostrin RK, Tyler LK. Automatic access to lexical semantics in aphasia: evidence from semantic and associative priming. Brain Lang 1993, 45:147-159. 10.1006/brln.1993.1040, 8358594.
71. Tyler LK, Ostrin RK, Cooke M, Moss H. Automatic access of lexical information in Broca's aphasics: against the automaticity hypothesis. Brain Lang 1995, 48:131-162. 10.1006/brln.1995.1007, 7728514.
72. Chiarello C, Richards L, Pollock A. Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres?. Brain Lang 1992, 42:52-76. 10.1016/0093-934X(92)90056-K, 1547469.
73. Hass EJ, Whipple JL. Effects of a concurrent memory task on hemisperic asymmetried in categorization. Brain Cogn 1985, 4:13-26. 10.1016/0278-2626(85)90051-X, 4027053.
74. Ansaldo AI, Arguin M, Lecours AR. Recovery from aphasia: a longitudinal study on language recovery, lateralization patterns and attentional resources. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004, 26:621-627.
75. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, Schraknepper V, Willmes K, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006, 129:1371-1384. 10.1093/brain/awl090, 16638796.