Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: A qualitative study

BMC Nephrology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Rygh, Ellen ^a   Arild, Eli ^a   Johnsen, Elin ^a   Rumpsfeld, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Chronic care model; Fellow patients; Home dialysis; Modality selection; Patient empowerment; Self management; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HOME DIALYSIS; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MACHINE; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORWAY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELEMEDICINE; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NORWAY; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84858315859     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-13     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Wuerth DB, Finkelstein SH, Schwetz O, Carey H, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO, Perit Dial Int 2002 22 2 184 190 11990402 (Pubitemid 34546329)
2. Patients' views regarding choice of dialysis modality. Lee A, Gudex C, Povlsen JV, Bonnevie B, Nielsen CP, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008 23 12 3953 3959 10.1093/ndt/gfn365 18586764
3. U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2011 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Bethesda, MD 2009 http://www.usrds.org/adr.aspx [Publications based upon USRDS data reported here must include this citation and the following notice: The data reported here have been supplied by the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the U.S. government]
4. The Norwegian Renal Registry, Annual Report http://www.nephro.no/nnr.html
5. Incresing the use of peritoneal dialysis can generate significant savings to the Norwegian Health Care system, Poster. Paulsen D, Rumpsfeld M, Laplante S, ERA-EDTA Munich, Germany 2010 http://www.postersessiononline.com/173580348- eu/congresos/47era/aula/-Sa-187-47era.pdf
6. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002 17 1 112 1 10.1093/ndt/17.1.112 11773473
7. Sosial- og helsedirektoratet. Antall dialysepasienter i Norge øker. Hvordan møte denne utviklingen best mulig i årene fremover? Rapport fra arbeidsgruppe nedsatt 01/12/06 Oslo 2006 [The Norwegian Directorate of Health. The number of dialysis patients in Norway increases. How to meet this trend the best way in the years ahead? Report from the working group appointed 01/12/2006.]
8. En renessanse for hjemmehemodialyse? Leder. Holdaas H, Westlie L, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2006 126 2785 Norwegian [A renaissance for home haemodialysis? Editorial] 17086216
9. Home haemodialysis-international trends and variation. MacGregor MS, Agar JWM, Blagg CR, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006 21 7 1934 1945 10.1093/ndt/gfl093 16537659 (Pubitemid 43985723)
10. Daily haemodialysis 2006. State of the art. Pierratos A, McFarlane P, Chan C, Kwok S, Nesrallah G, Minerva Urol Nefrol 2006 58 2 99 115 16767065 (Pubitemid 43962388)
11. Systematic review of the effectiveness of home versus hospital or satellite unit haemodialysis for people with end-stage renal failure. Mowatt G, Vale L, MacLeod A, Int J Tech Assess Health Care 2004 20 258 268 15446754 (Pubitemid 39079560)
12. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care Washington DC: National Academy Press, Field MJ, 1996
13. Telemedicine in haemodialysis: a university department and two remote satellites linked together as one common workplace. Rumpsfeld M, Arild E, Norum J, Breivik E, J Telemed Telecare 2005 11 5 251 255 10.1258/1357633054471885 16035968 (Pubitemid 41115917)
14. Telemedicine and follow up of peritoneal dialysis patients. Gallar P, Gutierrez M, Ortega O, Rodríguez I, Oliet A, Herrero JC, Mon C, Ortiz M, Molina A, Vigil A, Nefrologia 2006 26 3 365 371 16892826 (Pubitemid 44898045)
15. Two-year experience with telemedicine in the follow-up of patients in home peritoneal dialysis. Gallar P, Vigil A, Rodriguez I, Ortega O, Gutierrez M, Hurtado J, Oliet A, Ortiz M, Mon C, Herrero JC, Lentisco C, J Telemed Telecare 2007 13 6 288 292 10.1258/135763307781644906 17785025
16. Treatment data during pediatric home peritoneal teledialysis. Edefonti A, Boccola S, Picca M, Paglialonga F, Ardissino G, Marra G, Ghio L, Parisotto MT, Pediatr Nephrol 2003 18 6 560 564 12720083 (Pubitemid 36790098)
17. Telemedicine system for patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nakamoto H, Perit Dial Int 2007 27 Suppl 2 21 26 17556306
18. Frequent prolonged home haemodialysis: three old concepts, one modern solution. Editorial Comments. Kooistra MP, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003 18 1 16 18 10.1093/ndt/18.1.16 12480953 (Pubitemid 36104472)
19. Remote monitoring in nocturnal home haemodialysis 2003. Hoy C, Hemodial Int 2004 8 2 144 150 10.1111/j.1492-7535.2004.01088.x 19379410 (Pubitemid 41025006)
20. Blaikie N, Approaches to Social Enquiry Advancing Knowledge Cambridge, UK; Malden, USA 2 2007 Polity Press
21. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. Wagner EH, Bennet SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M, J Altern Complement Med 2005 11 Suppl 1 7 15 15750357
22. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Malterud K, The Lancet 2001 358 9280 483 488 11513933 (Pubitemid 32769861)
23. A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease. Murray MA, Brunier G, Chung JO, Craig LA, Mills C, Thomas A, Stacey D, Patient Educ Couns 2009 76 2 149 158 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010 19324509
24. Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making. Moss AH, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010 5 12 2380 2383 10.2215/CJN.07170810 21051749
25. Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: a clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Covic A, Bammens B, Lobbedez T, Liviu S, Heimbürger O, van Biesen W, Fouque D, Vanholder R, NDT Plus 2010 Advanced Access April 20 20392704
26. Album D, Nære fremmede. Pasientkulturen i sykehus Tano Aschehoug, Oslo 1996 Norwegian. [Close Strangers. The patient culture in hospitals]
27. Patient stories about their dialysis experience biases others' choices regardless of doctor's advice: an experimental study. Winterbottom AE, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney AE, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011 [Epub ahead of print]
28. Partnering with patients to improve peritonitis rates. White S, Vinet A, Adv Perit Dial 2009 25 99 102 19886328
29. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer JK, Bonomi A, Health aff 2001 20 6 64 78 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 (Pubitemid 33707442)
30. A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses. Tsai AC, Morton SC, Mangione CM, Keeler EB, Am J Manag Care 2005 11 8 478 488 16095434 (Pubitemid 41208929)
31. The Chronic Care Model-A new approach in DK. Frølich A, Strandberg-Larsen M, Schiøtz ML, Odense: University of Southern Denmark 2008 http://www.hpm.org/en/Surveys/University-of-Southern-Denmark-Denmark/11/ The-Chronic-Care-Model-A-new-approach-in-DK.html Health Policy Monitor. Survey no:11
32. Moving toward a more patient-centered health care delivery system. Hibbard JH, Health Aff (Millwood) 2004 Suppl Web Exclusives 133 5 15471780
33. Digitalt pasientfellesskap som sosial ressurs og tilfredse pasienter som sosiologisk problem. Johnsen E, Burkow T, Vognild LK, Digitale pasienter [Digital patients] Gyldendal Akademisk, Oslo, Tjora A, Sandaunet AG, 2010 163 80 Norwegian. [Digital patient communities as a social resource and satisfied patients as a sociological problem]
34. Det sosiale nettet og helse. Johnsen E, Fernandeze-Luque L, Hagen R, Digitale pasienter [Digital Patients] Gyldendal Akademisk, Oslo, Tjora A, Sandaunet AG, 2010 26 65 Norwegian. [Social media and health]
35. Illness perceptions in dialysis patients and their association with quality of life. Timmers L, Thong M, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Heijman M, Rijken M, Weinman J, Psychol Health 2008 23 6 679 690 10.1080/14768320701246535
36. IBM Researchs. On Demand Innovation Services/FOCUS on.Telemedicine. 2010 http://domino.research.ibm.com/odis/odis.nsf/pages/focus.08.html