Experiments with moving children and digital cameras

Children's Geographies

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-16

  Kullman, Kim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

children's geographies; digital cameras; experimentation; expression; participation; science and technology studies; visual research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858302365     PISSN: 14733285     EISSN: 14733277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2011.638174     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson, B. and Harrison, P. 2010. Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography, London, UK: Ashgate.
2. Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research, London, UK: Sage.
3. Bennett, J. 2001. The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bissell, D. 2009. Visualising everyday geographies: Practices of vision through travel time. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 34: 42-60.
5. Büscher, M. and Urry, J. 2009. Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory, 12: 99-116.
6. Cook, T. and Hess, E. 2007. What the camera sees and from whose perspective. Fun methodologies for engaging children in enlightening adults. Childhood, 14: 29-45.
7. Deleuze, G. 2003. Francis Bacon. The logic of sensation, London, UK: Continuum.
8. Foucault, M. 1984. "What is an author?". In The Foucault Reader, Edited by: Rabinow, P. 101-120. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
9. Gallacher, L-A. and Gallagher, M., 2008. Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through 'participatory methods'. Childhood, 15, 499-516.
10. Gallagher, M. 2008. 'Power is not an evil': Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children's Geographies, 6: 137-150.
11. Garrett, B. L. 2010. Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 35: 521-541.
12. Goffman, E. 1969. The presentation of self in everyday life, London, UK: Penguin. [1959]
13. Grimaud, E. 2007. The film in hand modes of coordination and assisted virtuosity in Bombay film studios. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3: 59-77.
14. Gye, L. 2007. Picture this: The impact of mobile camera phones on personal photographic practices. Continuum, 21: 279-288.
15. Harper, D. 2002. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17: 14-26.
16. Horton, J. 2008. A 'sense of failure'? Everydayness and research ethics. Children's Geographies, 6: 363-383.
17. Horton, J. and Kraftl, P. 2006. Not just growing up but going on: Materials, spacings, bodies, situations. Children's Geographies, 4: 259-276.
18. Jensen, C. P. and Lauritsen, P. 2005. Qualitative research as partial connection: Bypassing the power-knowledge nexus. Qualitative Research, 5: 59-77.
19. Kraftl, P. and Horton, J. 2007. The health event: Everyday, affective politics of participation. Geoforum, 38: 1012-1027.
20. Kullman, K., 2007. Skejtande, kroppslighet och kollektivitet. Sosiologia, 44, 314-326.
21. Kullman, K. 2010. Transitional geographies: Making mobile children. Social and Cultural Geography, 11: 827-844.
22. Larsen, J. 2008. Practices and flows of digital photography: An ethnographic framework. Mobilities, 3: 141-160.
23. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembing the social. An introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [1979]
25. Law, J. 2004. After method. Mess in social science research, London, UK: Routledge.
26. Lee, N. 2001. Childhood and society. Growing up in an age of uncertainty, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
27. Lee, J. and Ingold T., 2006. Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. In Coleman S. and Collins P. (eds) (2006) Locating the field. Space, place and context in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 67-86.
28. Lehtonen, T.-K. 2003. The domestication of technologies as a set of trials. Journal of Consumer Culture, 3: 363-385.
29. MacRae, C. 2008. Representing space: Katie's horse and the recalcitrant object. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9: 275-286.
30. Marks, L. U. 2000. The skin of the film. Intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32. Michael, M. 2004. On making data social: Heterogeneity in sociological practice. Qualitative Research, 4: 5-23.
33. Mikkelsen, M. R. and Christensen, P. 2009. Is children's mobility really independent? A study of children's mobility combining ethnography and GPS/mobile phone technologies. Mobilities, 4: 37-58.
34. Mitchell, L. M. 2006. Child-centered? Thinking critically about children's drawings as a visual research method. Visual Anthropology Review, 22: 60-73.
35. Mizen, P. 2005. A little 'light work'? Children's images of their labour. Visual Studies, 20: 124-139.
36. Mol, A. and Law, J. 2002. "Local entanglements or utopian moves: An inquiry into train accidents". In Utopia and organization, Edited by: Parker, M. 82-105. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
37. O'Sullivan, S. 2001. The aesthetics of affect. Thinking art beyond representation. Angelaki, 6: 125-135.
38. Pickering, A. 1995. The mangle of practice. Time, agency, and science, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
39. Pink, S. 2007. Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22: 240-252.
40. Pink, S. 2009. Doing sensory ethnography, London, UK: Sage.
41. Rajcman, J. 2001. The Deleuze connections, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Rasmussen, K. 2004. Places of children - children's places. Childhood, 11: 155-173.
43. Rheinberger, H.-J. 1997. Towards a history of epistemic things. Synthesizing proteins in the test tube, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, London, UK: Sage.
45. Ross, N. 2007. 'My journey to school': Foregrounding the meaning of school journeys and children's engagements and interactions in their everyday localities. Children's Geographies, 5: 373-391.
46. Russell, C. 1999. Experimental ethnography. The work of film in the age of video, London, UK: Duke University Press.
47. Savage, M., Ruppert, E. and Law, J. 2010. Digital devices: Nine theses. Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change Working Paper no. 86,
48. Schäfer, N. and Yarwood, R. 2008. Involving young people as researchers: Uncovering multiple power relations among youth. Children's Geographies, 6: 121-135.
49. Sobchack, V. 1992. The embodied eye: A phenomenology of film experience, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Stoller, P. 1997. Sensuous scholarship, Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
51. Suchman, L. 2005. Affiliative objects. Organization, 12: 379-399.
52. Symes, C. 2007. Coaching and training: An ethnography of student commuting on Sydney's suburban trains. Mobilities, 2: 443-461.
53. Thomson, F. 2007. Are methodologies for children keeping them in their place?. Children's Geographies, 5: 207-218.
54. Thomson, P. 2008. Doing visual research with children and young people, Edited by: Thomson, P. London, UK: Routledge.
55. Thrift, N. 2005. "Beyond mediation: Three new material registers and their consequences". In Materiality, Edited by: Miller, D. 231-255. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56. Thrift, N. 2007. Non-representational theory. Space, politics, affect, London, UK: Routledge.
57. Turetsky, P. 2004. "Rhythm: Assemblage and event". In Deleuze and music, Edited by: Buchanan, I. and Swiboda, M. 140-158. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
58. Walker, M., Whyatt, D., Pooley, C., Davies, G., Coulton, P. and Bamford, W. 2009. Talk, technologies and teenagers: Understanding the school journey using a mixed-methods approach. Children's Geographies, 7: 107-122.
59. Wasson, H. 2007. "The networked screen: Moving images, materiality, and the aesthetics of size". In Fluid screens, expanded cinema, Edited by: Marchessault, J. and Lord, S. 74-95. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
60. White, A., Bushin, N., Carpena-Mendez, F. and Ni Laoire, C. 2010. Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods. Qualitative Research, 10: 143-158.
61. Wylie, J. 2006. Depths and folds: On landscape and the gazing subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24: 519-535.
62. Young, L. and Barrett, H. 2001. Adapting visual methods: Action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33: 141-152.