Assessing the Enrichment Performance in Targeted Resequencing Experiments

Human Mutation

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 635-641

  Frommolt, Peter ^a,b   Abdallah, Ali T ^a,b   Altmüller, Janine ^b   Motameny, Susanne ^b   Thiele, Holger ^b   Becker, Christian ^b   Stemshorn, Kathryn ^b   Fischer, Matthias ^a,c   Freilinger, Tobias ^d   Nürnberg, Peter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^d LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analysis pipeline; Assay evaluation; Target enrichment; Whole exome resequencing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA LIBRARY; EXOME; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; WEB BROWSER;

EXOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84858291153     PISSN: 10597794     EISSN: 10981004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22036     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Albers CA, Lunter G, MacArthur DG, McVean G, Ouwehand WH, Durbin R. 2011. Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data. Genome Res 21:961-973.
2. Albert TJ, Molla MN, Muzny DM, Nazareth L, Wheeler D, Song X, Richmond TA, Middle CM, Rodesch MJ, Packard CJ, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA. 2007. Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat Methods 4:903-905.
3. Asan NF, Xu Y, Jiang H, Tyler-Smith C, Xue Y, Jiang T, Wang J, Wu M, Liu X, Tian G, Wang J, Yang H, Zhang X. 2011. Comprehensive comparison of three commercial human whole-exome capture platforms. Genome Biol 12:R95.
4. Clark MJ, Chen R, Lam HYK, Karczewski KJ, Chen R, Euskirchen G, Butte AJ, Snyder M. 2011. Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nat Biotechnol 29:908-914.
5. Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J, Rogov P, LeProust EM, Brockman W, Fennell T, Giannoukos G, Fisher S, Russ C, Gabriel S, Jaffe DB, Lander ES, Nusbaum C. 2009. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 27:182-189.
6. Huebner AK, Gandia M, Frommolt P, Maak A, Wicklein EM, Thiele H, Altmüller J, Wagner F, Viñuela A, Aguirre LA, Moreno F, Maier H, Rau I, Gießelmann S, Nürnberg G, Gal A, Nürnberg P, Hübner CA, del Castillo I, Kurth I. 2011. Nonsense mutations in SMPX, encoding a protein responsive to physical force, result in X-chromosomal hearing loss. Am J Hum Genet 88:1-7.
7. Kiialainen A, Karlberg O, Ahlford A, Sigurdsson S, Lindblad-Toh K, Syvänen AC. 2011. Performance of microarray and liquid based capture methods for target enrichment for massively parallel sequencing and SNP discovery. PLoS One 6:e16486.
8. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
9. Mamanova L, Coffey AJ, Scott CE, Kozarewa I, Turner EH, Kumar A, Howard E, Shendure J, Turner DJ. 2010. Target enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods 7:111-118.
10. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. 2008. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5:621-628.
11. Parla JS, Iossifov I, Grabill I, Spector MS, Kramer M, McCombie WR. 2011. A comparative analysis of exome capture. Genome Biol 12:R97.
12. Solunen AM, Ellonen P, Almusa H, Lepistö M, Eldfors S, Hannula S, Miettinen T, Tyynismaa H, Salo P, Heckman C, Joensuu H, Raivio T, Suomalainen A, Saarela J. 2011. Comparison of solution-based exome capture methods for next-generation sequencing. Genome Biol 12:R94.
13. Tewhey R, Warner JB, Nakano M, Libby B, Medkova M, David PH, Kotsopoulos SK, Samuel ML, Hutchison JB, Larson JW, Topol EJ, Weiner MP, Harismendy O, Olson J, Link DR, Frazer KA. 2009. Microdroplet-based PCR enrichment for large-scale targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 27:1025-1031.