Improved skin test for differential diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis by the addition of Rv3020c-derived peptides

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 620-622

  Jones, Gareth J ^a   Whelan, Adam ^a   Clifford, Derek ^a   Coad, Mick ^a   Vordermeier, H Martin ^a  

^a VETERINARY LABORATORIES AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BCG VACCINE; GAMMA INTERFERON; MYCOBACTERIUM VACCINE; PEPTIDE; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; RV2346C PEPTIDE; RV3020C PEPTIDE; RV3615C PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BCG VACCINATION; BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS; CATTLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOGENICITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUBERCULIN TEST;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, BACTERIAL; BCG VACCINE; CATTLE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; PEPTIDES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN TESTS; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

EID: 84858282907     PISSN: 15566811     EISSN: 1556679X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00024-12     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alvarez J, et al. 2009. Effect of paratuberculosis on the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in a cattle herd with a mixed infection using interferongamma detection assay. Vet. Microbiol. 135:389-393.
2. Alvarez J, et al. 2008. Interference of paratuberculosis with the diagnosis of tuberculosis in a goat flock with a natural mixed infection. Vet. Microbiol. 128:72-80. (Pubitemid 351200572)
3. Aranaz A, et al. 2006. Assessment of diagnostic tools for eradication of bovine tuberculosis in cattle co-infected with Mycobacterium bovis and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet. Res. 37:593-606. (Pubitemid 44186432)
4. Behr MA, et al. 1999. Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by wholegenome DNA microarray. Science 284:1520-1523.
5. DEFRA. 2010. The UK Chief Veterinary Officer's 2009 report on animal health and welfare. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, United Kingdom. http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/about/who/cvo/documents/ 2009report.pdf.
6. Garnier T, et al. 2003. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:7877-7882. (Pubitemid 36760063)
7. Gordon SV, et al. 1999. Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial artificial chromosome arrays. Mol. Microbiol. 32:643-655. (Pubitemid 29233907)
8. Jones GJ, Hewinson RG, Vordermeier HM. 2010. Screening of predicted secreted antigens from Mycobacterium bovis identifies potential novel differential diagnostic reagents. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 17:1344-1348.
9. Kohler H, et al. 2001. Immune reactions in cattle after immunization with a Mycobacterium paratuberculosis vaccine and implications for the diagnosis of M. paratuberculosis and M. bovis infections. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 48:185-195. (Pubitemid 32424634)
10. Mahairas GG, Sabo PJ, Hickey MJ, Singh DC, Stover CK. 1996. Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis. J. Bacteriol. 178:1274-1282. (Pubitemid 26073382)
11. Millington KA, et al. 2011. Rv3615c is a highly immunodominant RD1 (Region of Difference 1)-dependent secreted antigen specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:5730-5735.
12. Olsen I, et al. 2005. Bovine NK cells can produce gamma interferon in response to the secreted mycobacterial proteins ESAT-6 and MPP14 but not in response to MPB70. Infect. Immun. 73:5628-5635. (Pubitemid 41192998)
13. Sidders B, et al. 2008. Screening of highly expressed mycobacterial genes identifies Rv3615c as a useful differential diagnostic antigen for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Infect. Immun. 76:3932-3939.
14. Skinner MA, et al. 2005. The order of prime-boost vaccination of neonatal calves with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and a DNA vaccine encoding mycobacterial proteins Hsp65, Hsp70, and Apa is not critical for enhancing protection against bovine tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 73:4441-4444. (Pubitemid 40923197)
15. Vordermeier HM, et al. 1999. Development of diagnostic reagents to differentiate between Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination and M. bovis infection in cattle. Clin. Diagn. Lab Immunol. 6:675-682. (Pubitemid 29441172)
16. Vordermeier HM, Huygen K, Singh M, Hewinson RG, Xing Z. 2006. Immune responses induced in cattle by vaccination with a recombinant adenovirus expressing mycobacterial antigen 85A and Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect. Immun. 74:1416-1418. (Pubitemid 43185586)
17. Vordermeier HM, et al. 2004. Cellular immune responses induced in cattle by heterologous prime-boost vaccination using recombinant viruses and bacille Calmette-Guerin. Immunology 112:461-470. (Pubitemid 38859525)
18. Vordermeier HM, et al. 2009. Viral booster vaccines improve Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced protection against bovine tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 77:3364-3373.
19. Wedlock DN, et al. 2005. Vaccination of cattle with a CpG oligodeoxynucleotide- formulated mycobacterial protein vaccine and Mycobacterium bovis BCG induces levels of protection against bovine tuberculosis superior to those induced by vaccination with BCG alone. Infect. Immun. 73:3540-3546.
20. Whelan AO, et al. 2010. Development of a skin test for bovine tuberculosis for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3176-3181.
21. Wood PR, et al. 1991. Field comparison of the interferon-gamma assay and the intradermal tuberculin test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Aust. Vet. J. 68:286-290.