Innovation research in India: A multidisciplinary literature review

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 716-720

  Pillania, Rajesh K ^a  

^a MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; India; Innovations; Literature review; Multidisciplinary

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; BUSINESS REVIEWS; EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; HARVARD; INDIA; INNOVATION RESEARCH; KNOWLEDGE DATABASE; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY; MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES; PLANT SCIENCE; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; RESEARCH PAPERS; SOCIAL CHANGES; TECHNOLOGY FORECASTING;

AGRICULTURE; INNOVATION; PUBLISHING; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

RESEARCH;

BIBLIOGRAPHY; DATABASE; INNOVATION; LITERATURE REVIEW; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH WORK; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INDIA;

EID: 84858280958     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Pillania R.K. Strategy in India guest editorial. Manag. Decis. 2008, 46(10):i-v.
2. Sachs Goldman Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050 2003, Goldman Sachs web site available at:, (accessed March 16, 2008). http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/brics/brics-dream.html.
3. Sachs Goldman BRICs and Beyond 2007, Goldman Sachs web site available at:, (accessed March 16, 2008). http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/brics/BRICs-and-Beyond.html.
4. Kim W.C., Mauborgne R. Blue Ocean strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2004, 82(10):32-43.
5. Christensen C.M., Baumann H., Ruggles R., Sadtler T.M. Disruptive innovations for social change. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2006, 84(12):41-50.
6. Pillania R.K. New knowledge creation scenario in Indian industry. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2006, 6(3-4):21-32.
7. Prahalad C.K. Strategies for growth. Rethinking the Future 1997, 62-75. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London. R. Gibson (Ed.).
8. Pillania R.K. Leveraging knowledge: Indian industry' expectations and shortcomings. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2005, 6(2):31-34.
9. Kim J., McMillan S. Evaluation of internet advertising research-a bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. J. Advert. 2008, 37(1):99-112.
10. Borgman C.L. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics revisited. The Web of Knowledge 2000, 143-162. Medford, NJ. B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.).
11. Price D.J.D. General theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantages processes. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1976, 27(5-5):292-306.
12. White H.D., McCain K.W. Bibliometrics. Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci. Tech. 1989, 24:119-186.
13. Wiberley S.E. A methodological approach to developing bibliometric models of types of humanities scholarship. Libr. Q. 2003, 73(2):121-159.
14. Glanzel W. A bibliometric approach to social sciences, national research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990-1992. Scientometrics 1996, 35(3):291-307.
15. Pasadeos Y., Renfro R.B., Hanily M.L. Influential authors and works of the public relations scholarly literature: a network of recent research. J. Publ. Relat. Res. 1999, 11(1):29-52.
16. Arnott D.C. Research on trust: a bibliography and brief bibliometric analysis of the special issue submissions. Eur. J. Mark. 2007, 41(9-10):1203-1240.
17. Pillania R.K., Fetscherin M. Multinationals and emerging markets guest editorial. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 2009, 17(2):1-9.
18. Acedo J., Casillas C. Current paradigms in the international management field: an author co-citation analysis. Int. Bus. Rev. 2005, 14(5):619-639.
19. Van Raan A.F.J. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung, Theorie und Praxis 2003, 12(1):20-29.
20. Reeves B., Borgman C.L. A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Hum. Commun. Res. 1983, 10(1):119-136.
21. Schubert A., Glanzel W., Braun T. Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981-1985. Scientometrics 1989, 16(1-6):463-478.
22. Zhao M.Y. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52(8):1185-1199.
23. Karmarkar U. Will you survive the services revolution?. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2004, 82(6):100-108.
24. Feinberg S.E., Majumdar S.K. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2001, 32(3):421-437.
25. Pal A., Mbarika V.W.A., Cobb-Payton F., Datta P., McCoy S. Telemedicine diffusion in a developing country: the case of India. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2005, 9(1):59-65.
26. Reddy P. New trends in globalization of corporate R & D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: a survey from India. World Dev. 1997, 25(11):1821-1837.
27. Patibandla M., Petersen B. Role of transnational corporations in the evolution of a high-tech industry: the case of India's software industry. World Dev. 2002, 30(9):1561-1577.
28. Raut L.K. R&D spillover and productivity growth: evidence from Indian private 9 firms. J. Dev. Econ. 1995, 48(1):1-23.
29. D'Costa A.P. Uneven and combined development: understanding India's software exports. World Dev. 2003, 31(1):211-226.
30. Altenburg T., Schmitz H., Stamm A. Breakthrough? China's and India's transition from production to innovation. World Dev. 2008, 36(2):325-344.
31. Peters D.H., Rao K.S., Fryatt R. Lumping and splitting: the health policy agenda in India. Health Pol. Plann. 2003, 18(3):249-260.