Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: A structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1021-1026

  Martins, Y ^a,b   Lederman, R I ^a   Lowenstein, C L ^a   Joffe, S ^a,b   Neville, B A ^a   Hastings, B T ^a   Abel, G A ^a  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

health services research; oncology; response rates; surveys

Indexed keywords

CANCER RESEARCH; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT REFERRAL; POSTAL MAIL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; RESPONSE RATE; REVIEW; STRUCTURED LITERATURE REVIEW; TELECONSULTATION; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MASSACHUSETTS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIANS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84858276802     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: 15321827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.28     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50(10): 1129-1136 (Pubitemid 27477990)
2. Barclay S, Todd C, Finlay I, Grande G, Wyatt P (2002) Not another questionnaire! maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract 19(1): 105-111 (Pubitemid 34173284)
3. Baron G, DeWals P, Milord F (2001) Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey. Eval Health Prof 24(1): 47-52 (Pubitemid 32182259)
4. Beebe TJ, Locke III GR, Barnes SA, Davern ME, Anderson KJ (2007) Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians. Health Serv Res 42(3 Part 1): 1219-1234 (Pubitemid 46699481)
5. Bergk V, Gasse C, Schnell R, Haefeli WE (2005) Mail surveys: obsolescent model or valuable instrument in general practice research? Swiss Med Wkly 135(13-14): 189-191 (Pubitemid 40632286)
6. Berry SR, Bell CM, Ubel PA, Evans WK, Nadler E, Strevel EL, Neumann PJ (2010) Continental divide? the attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs. J Clin Oncol 28(27): 4149-4153
7. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Shankardass K, Sprague S, Guyatt GH (2003) A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: effect on primary response rates. Int J Epidemiol 32(4): 634-636 (Pubitemid 37039021)
8. Bostick RM, Pirie PH, Luepker RV, Kofron PM (1992) Using physician caller follow-UPs to improve the response rate to a physician telephone survey. Eval Health Prof 15: 420-433
9. Braithwaite D, Emery J, De Lusignan S, Sutton S (2003) Using the internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract 20(5): 545-551 (Pubitemid 37258758)
10. Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Visentin L, Stiell IG (2006) Print format and sender recognition were related to survey completion rate. J Clin Epidemiol 59(6): 635-641 (Pubitemid 43732415)
11. Burt CW, Woodwell D (2003) Tests of methods to improve response to physician surveys. Paper presented at the 2005 Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Arlington, VA (available at http://www.fcsm. gov/05papers/Burt- Woodwell-VIIB.pdf)
12. Clark TJ, Khan KS, Gupta JK (2001a) Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. Isrctn 32032031. Bmc Med Res Methodol 1: 12
13. Clark TJ, Khan KS, Gupta JK (2001b) Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 55(8): 595-596 (Pubitemid 32662063)
14. Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP (2009) Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. Bmc Health Serv Res 9(160): 160
15. Cull WL, O'connor KG, Sharp S, Tang SF (2005) Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Serv Res 40(1): 213-226 (Pubitemid 40229357)
16. Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR (2001) Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res 35(6): 1347-1355 (Pubitemid 32163983)
17. Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S (2009) Primary care physicians' views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 27(20): 3338-3345
18. Delnevo CD, Abatemarco DJ, Steinberg MB (2004) Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive. Am J Prev Med 26(3): 234-236 (Pubitemid 38338674)
19. Drummond FJ, Sharp L, Carsin AE, Kelleher T, Comber H (2008) Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians. J Clin Epidemiol 61(2): 177-185
20. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S (2009) Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(3): Mr000008
21. Field TS, Cadoret CA, Brown ML, Ford M, Greene SM, Hill D, Hornbrook MC, Meenan RT, White MJ, Zapka JM (2002) Surveying physicians: do components of the 'total design approach' to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians? Med Care 40(7): 596-605
22. Gattellari M, Ward JE (2001) Will donations to their learned college increase surgeons' participation in surveys? a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol 54(6): 645-649 (Pubitemid 32453359)
23. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S (2008) Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among canadian physicians and physiciansin-training. Can Fam Physician 54(10): 1424-1430
24. Greenfield DM, Absolom K, Eiser C, Walters SJ, Michel G, Hancock BW, Snowden JA, Coleman RE (2009) Follow-up care for cancer survivors: the views of clinicians. Br J Cancer 101(4): 568-574
25. Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Berlin JA, Asch DA (2002) Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires. Med Care 40(9): 834-839
26. Heywood A, Mudge P, Ring I, Sanson-Fisher R (1995) Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: the use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research. Fam Pract 12(2): 227-231
27. Hocking JS, Lim MS, Read T, Hellard M (2006) Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol 59(5): 521-524
28. Jepson C, Asch DA, Hershey JC, Ubel PA (2005) In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol 58(1): 103-105 (Pubitemid 40093119)
29. Jiwa M, Coker AE, Bagley J, Freeman J, Coleman M (2004) Surveying general practitioners: a new avenue. Curr Med Res Opin 20(3): 319-324 (Pubitemid 38339171)
30. Keating NL, Zaslavsky AM, Goldstein J, West DW, Ayanian JZ (2008) Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates. Med Care 46(8): 878-881
31. Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys. a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20(1): 61-67 (Pubitemid 32013069)
32. Klabunde CN, Keating NL, Potosky AL, Ambs A, He Y, Hornbrook MC, Ganz PA (2011) A population-based assessment of specialty physician involvement in cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(5): 384-397
33. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P (2006) Does flattery work? a comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons. Can J Surg 49(2): 90-95
34. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH (2004) Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2). J Med Internet Res 6(3): E30
35. Lensing SY, Gillaspy SR, Simpson PM, Jones SM, James JM (2000) Encouraging physicians to respond to surveys through the use of fax technology. Eval Health Prof 23(3): 349-360 (Pubitemid 30655961)
36. Leung GM, Ho LM, Chan MF, Jm MJ, Wong FK (2002) The effects of cash and lottery incentives on mailed surveys to physicians: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol 55(8): 801-807
37. Leung GM, Johnston JM, Saing H, Tin KY, Wong IO, Ho LM (2004) Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians. J Clin Epidemiol 57(8): 777-784 (Pubitemid 39370160)
38. Martin BC (1974) Don't Survey Physicians! Center For Health Services Research And Development, American Medical Association: Chicago, IL
39. Mccoll E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J (2001) Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 5(31): 1-256
40. Mcdermott MM, Greenland P, Hahn EA, Brogan D, Cella D, Ockene J, Pearce WH, Criqui MH, Hirsch A, Lipsky M, Odom L, Hanley K, Khan S (2003) The effects of continuing medical education credits on physician response rates to a mailed questionnaire. Health Mark Q 20(4): 27-42 (Pubitemid 38860171)
41. Mcfarlane E, Olmsted MG, Murphy J, Hill CA (2007) Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians. Eval Health Prof 30(2): 170-185
42. Mckenzie-Mcharg K, Tully L, Gates S, Ayers S, Brocklehurst P (2005) Effect on survey response rate of hand written versus printed signature on a covering letter: randomised controlled trial [Isrctn67566265]. Bmc Health Serv Res 5: 52
43. Mcmahon SR, Iwamoto M, Massoudi MS, Yusuf HR, Stevenson JM, David F, Chu SY, Pickering LK (2003) Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians. Pediatrics 111(4 Part 1): E299-E303
44. Moses SH, Clark TJ (2004) Effect of prize draw incentive on the response rate to a postal survey of obstetricians and gynaecologists: a randomised controlled trial. [Isrctn32823119]. Bmc Health Serv Res 4(1): 14
45. Puleo E, Zapka J, White MJ, Mouchawar J, Somkin C, Taplin S (2002) Caffeine, cajoling, and other strategies to maximize clinician survey response rates. Eval Health Prof 25(2): 169-184 (Pubitemid 34507358)
46. Raziano DB, Jayadevappa R, Valenzula D, Weiner M, Lavizzo-Mourey R (2001) E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs. Gerontologist 41(6): 799-804 (Pubitemid 33139637)
47. Recklitis CJ, Campbell EG, Kutner JS, Bober SL (2009) Money talks: nonmonetary incentive and internet administration fail to increase response rates to a physician survey. J Clin Epidemiol 62(2): 224-226
48. Robertson J, Walkom EJ, Mcgettigan P (2005) Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 14(8): 571-577 (Pubitemid 41179487)
49. Schrag D, Hanger M (2007) Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: a pilot survey. J Clin Oncol 25(2): 233-237 (Pubitemid 350003040)
50. Seguin R, Godwin M, Macdonald S, Mccall M (2004) E-mail or snail mail? randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys. Can Fam Physician 50: 414-419 (Pubitemid 38372462)
51. Sprague S, Quigley L, Bhandari M (2009) Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 3): 27-34
52. Streiff MB, Dundes L, Spivak JL (2001) A mail survey of united states hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes. J Clin Epidemiol 54(4): 430-432 (Pubitemid 32303468)
53. Tamayo-Sarver JH, Baker DW (2004) Comparison of responses to a US 2 dollar bill versus a chance to win 250 US dollars in a mail survey of emergency physicians. Acad Emerg Med 11(8): 888-891 (Pubitemid 38951101)
54. Thomson CE, Paterson-Brown S, Russell D, Mccaldin D, Russell IT (2004) Short report: encouraging GPs to complete postal questionnaires-one big prize or many small prizes? A randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 21(6): 697-698 (Pubitemid 39654870)
55. Thorpe C, Ryan B, Mclean SL, Burt A, Stewart M, Brown JB, Reid GJ, Harris S (2009) How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians. Fam Pract 26(1): 65-68
56. Vandenkerkhof EG, Parlow JL, Goldstein DH, Milne B (2004) In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire. Can J Anaesth 51(5): 449-454 (Pubitemid 38594367)
57. Vangeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL (2007) Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 30(4): 303-321
58. Vangeest JB, Wynia MK, Cummins DS, Wilson IB (2001) Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians. Med Care 39(2): 197-201 (Pubitemid 33603629)