Encouraging physicians to respond to surveys through the use of fax technology

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 349-360

  Lensing, S Y ^a   Gillaspy, S R ^a   Simpson, P M ^a   Jones, S M ^a   James, J M ^a  

^a ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH SURVEY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 0033838713     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01632780022034642     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives
2. Response rotes to mail surveys published in medical journals
3. Physician response to a mailed survey: An experiment in timing of payment
4. Simple Random Sampling
5. Fax surveys: Return patterns and comparison with mail surveys
6. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rote of a survey to family physicians
7. A comparison of physicians who did or did not respond to a postal questionnaire
8. The effects of nonresponse and late response on a survey of physician attitudes
9. Physician response rates to a telephone survey: Effects of monetary incentive level
10. Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: The use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research
11. Not another questionnaire!: Eliciting the views of general practitioners
12. Effectiveness of telephone prompts when surveying general practitioners: A randomised trial
13. Survey of cardiac surgeons' perceptions of the addition of ASA to warfarin for patients with mechanical heart valves
14. Using FAX technology to survey professionals and organizations
15. Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: The effect on a survey of physicians; knowledge of genetics
16. Maximising response rates in a survey of general practitioners: Lessons from a Victorian survey on sexually transmittable diseases
17. Surveying general practitioners: Does a low response rate matter?
18. Increasing response rates of gynaecologists to a survey: A randomised trial of telephone prompts