Assessing implicit large eddy simulation for two-dimensional flow

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Volumn 138, Issue 663, 2012, Pages 365-376

  Kent, James ^a,b   Thuburn, John ^a   Wood, Nigel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c MET OFFICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cascade; Finite volume methods; Incompressible flow; MILES; Turbulence models; Turbulent flow

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC MODEL; BAROTROPIC; CLIMATE MODELLING; ENSTROPHY; FINITE VOLUME; IMPLICIT LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS; LAYER-WISE; MILES; NUMERICAL SCHEME; PARAMETRIZATIONS; PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE; SEMI-LAGRANGIAN ADVECTION SCHEMES; SUB-GRIDS; SUBGRID MODEL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL TURBULENCE; TRUNCATION ERRORS; TWO DIMENSIONAL TURBULENCE; TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW; UNRESOLVED SCALE; VORTICITY EQUATION; VORTICITY FILAMENTS;

ADVECTION; CASCADES (FLUID MECHANICS); ENERGY TRANSFER; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NUMERICAL MODELS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TURBULENCE MODELS; TURBULENT FLOW; VORTICITY;

TWO DIMENSIONAL;

ADVECTION; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; CLIMATE MODELING; ERROR ANALYSIS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW; VORTICITY;

EID: 84858275980     PISSN: 00359009     EISSN: 1477870X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qj.925     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arakawa A. 1966. Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: two-dimensional incompressible flow. Part I. J. Comput. Phys. 1: 119-143.
2. Berloff PS. 2005. Random-forcing model of the mesoscale ocean eddies. J. Fluid Mech. 529: 71-95.
3. Brown AR, MacVean MK, Mason PJ. 2000. The effects of numerical dissipation in large eddy simulations. J. Atmos. Sci. 57 3337-3348.
4. Fulton SR, Ciesielski PE, Schubert WH. 1986. Multigrid methods for elliptic problems: a review. Mon. Weather Rev. 114: 943-959.
5. Gill AE. 1982. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press: New York.
6. Grinstein FF, Fureby C. 2006. Recent progress on flux-limiting based implicit large eddy simulation. In European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2006.
7. Grinstein FF, Margolin LG, Rider WJ. 2007a. A rationale for implicit LES. In Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation, Grinstein FF, Margolin LG, Rider WJ (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; 39-58.
8. Grinstein FF, Margolin LG, Rider WJ. 2007b. Implicit Large Eddy Simulation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
9. Hermanson L, Hoskins BJ, Palmer TN. 2009. A comparative method to evaluate and validate stochastic parametrizations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135: 1095-1103.
10. Jablonowski C, Williamson DL. 2011. The pros and cons of diffusion, filters and fixers in atmospheric general circulation models. In Numerical Techniques for Global Atmospheric Models, Lauritzen PH, Jablonowski C, Taylor MA, Nair RD (eds). Springer: Berlin; 389-504.
11. Lauritzen PH, Nair RD, Ullrich PA. 2010. A conservative semi-Lagrangian multi-tracer transport scheme (CSLAM) on the cubed-sphere grid. J. Comput. Phys. 229: 1401-1424.
12. Leonard A. 1975. Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. Adv. Geophys. 18i 237-248.
13. Leonard BP, MacVean MK, Lock AP. 1993. Positivity-preserving numerical schemes for multidimensional advection. NASA Technical Memorandum 106055.
14. Lin SJ. 2004. A 'vertically Lagrangian' finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Mon. Weather Rev. 132: 2293-2307.
15. Margolin LG, Rider WJ. 2002. A rationale for implicit turbulence modeling. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl. 39: 821-841.
16. Margolin LG, Rider WJ. 2007. Numerical regularization: the numerical analysis of implicit subgrid models. In Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation, Grinstein FF, Margolin LG, Rider WJ (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; 195-221.
17. Sagaut P. 2001. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Springer: Berlin.
18. Sagaut P. 2007. Subgrid-scale modeling: issues and approaches. In Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation, Grinstein FF, Margolin LG, Rider WJ (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; 61-93.
19. Staniforth A, Côté J. 1991. Semi-Lagrangian integration schemes for atmospheric models: a review. Mon. Weather Rev. 119: 2206-2223.
20. Thuburn J. 1996. Multidimensional flux-limited advection schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 123: 74-83.
21. Ullrich PA, Jablonowksi C, van Leer B. 2010. High-order finite-volume methods for the shallow-water equations on the sphere. J. Comput. Phys. 229: 6104-6134.
22. van Leer B. 1974. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 14: 361-370.
23. Williamson DL. 2007. The evolution of dynamical cores for global atmospheric models. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 85B: 241-269.
24. Zerroukat M, Wood N, Staniforth A. 2002. SLICE: a semi-Lagrangian inherently conserving and efficient scheme for transport problems. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128: 2801-2820.