Comparison of micro-computed tomography and laser scanning for reverse engineering orthopaedic component geometries

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 226, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 263-267

  Teeter, Matthew G ^a,b   Brophy, Paul ^c   Naudie, Douglas Dr ^b   Holdsworth, David W ^a,b  

^a ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c Pivot Solutions Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Geometry; Implants; Joint arthroplasty; Laser scanning; Micro computed tomography

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT GEOMETRIES; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GEOMETRIC MODELS; IMPLANT COMPONENTS; JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; JOINT REPLACEMENT; LASER SCANNING; LASER SCANS; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SURFACE FEATURE; TIBIAL INSERTS; GEOMETRIC MODELING;

DENTAL PROSTHESES; GEOMETRY; JOINT PROSTHESES; LASER APPLICATIONS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; REVERSE ENGINEERING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; SCANNING; SURFACE ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LASER; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LASERS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84858234336     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411911434674     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Lutzner J, Kasten P, Gunther, KP, et al. Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2009; 5(6): 309-316.
2. Teeter MG, Naudie DDR, Milner JS, et al. Determination of reference geometry for polyethylene tibial insert wear analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(3): 497-503.
3. Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Stoel BC, et al. A new modelbased RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. J Biomech 2003; 36(6): 873-882. (Pubitemid 36555384)
4. Kohm A, Gaumer J, Ravula V, et al. Three-dimensional laser micrometry characterization of surface wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 82(2): 428-439. (Pubitemid 47106247)
5. Teeter MG, Naudie DDR, McErlain DD, et al. In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2010; 469(1): 107-112.
6. Otsu N. Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979; SMC-9(1): 62-66. (Pubitemid 9413341)
7. Teeter MG, Yuan X, Naudie DDR, et al. Technique to quantify subsurface cracks in retrieved polyethylene components with micro-CT. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2011; 20(1): 27-34.
8. Teeter MG, Nauide DDR, Bourne RB, et al. How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis? Clin Orthop Rel Res 2011; In press.