An output perspective on the teaching-research nexus: An analysis focusing on the United States higher education system

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 171-187

  Horta, Hugo ^a,b   Dautel, Vincent ^c   Veloso, Francisco M ^b,d  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Enterprise Research Unit Centre for Population   (Luxembourg)

^d CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PORTUGAL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

academic research; impact of graduate students on research results; impact of undergraduate students on research results; teaching research nexus

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858230924     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.503268     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alpert, D. 1985. Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56: 241-81.
2. Arreola, R. 2000. Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluating system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluating system, Boston, MA: Anker.
3. Arreola, R. 2007. Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Arreola, R., Theall, M. and Aleamoni, L. M. Beyond scholarship: Recognizing the multiple roles of the professoriate. Article presented at the 2003 American Educational Research Association Convention. Chicago.
5. Austin, A. 1996. "Institutional and departmental cultures: The relationship between teaching and research". In Faculty teaching and research: Is there a conflict?, Edited by: Braxton, J. 61-74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Austin, A. 2002. Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1): 94-122.
7. Barnett, B. 1992. "Teaching and research are inescapably incompatible". In Chronicle of Higher Education A40
8. Barnett, R. 1997. Higher education: A critical business, Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Bauer, K. and Bennett, J. 2003. Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. Journal of Higher Education, 74(2): 210-30.
10. Bellas, M. L. and Toutkoushian, R. K. 1999. Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22(4): 367-90.
11. Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
12. Braxton, J. M. 1996. "Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research". In New directions for instructional research, Edited by: Braxton, J. M. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Braxton, J. and Bayer, A. E. 1986. "Assessing faculty scholarly performance". In Measuring faculty research performance, Edited by: Creswell, J. W. 25-42. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Braxton, J. and Hargens, L. 1996. "Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research". In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Edited by: Smart, J. vol. 11, 1-46. New York: Agathon Press.
15. Brew, A. 1999. Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24: 291-301.
16. Brew, A. and Boud, D. 1995. Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link for learning. Higher Education, 29: 261-73.
17. Bridgwater, C. A., Wash, J. A. and Walkenbach, J. 1982. Pretenure and posttenure productivity trends of academic psychologists. American Psychologist, 37: 236-38.
18. Clark, B. R. 1987. The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
19. Coaldrake, P. and Stedman, L. 1999. Academic work in the twenty-first century: Changing roles and policies, Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
20. Colbeck, C. 1998. Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 69: 647-71.
21. Conceição, P. and Heitor, M. V. 1999. On the role of the university in the knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 26(1): 37-51.
22. Diamond, R. 1999. Aligning faculty rewards with institutional mission: Statements, policies and guidelines, Boston: Ankler Publishing.
23. Dundar, H. and Lewis, D. R. 1998. Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6): 607-31.
24. Durning, B. and Jenkins, A. 2005. Teaching/research relations in departments: The perspective of built environment academics. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4): 407-26.
25. Elton, L. 2001. Research and teaching: Conditions for a positive link. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1): 43-56.
26. Fairweather, J. S. 1996. Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Fairweather, J. S. 2002. The mythologies of faculty productivity. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1): 26-48.
28. Finkelstein, M., Seal, R. and Schuster, J. 1998. The new academic generation: A profession in transition, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29. Fox, M. F. 1992. Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65: 293-305.
30. Freidson, E. 1975. Doctoring together: A study of professional social control, New York: Elsevier.
31. Golde, C. M. and Dore, T. 2001. At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education, Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
32. Gonzalez-Brambila, C. and Veloso, F. M. 2007. The determinants of research productivity: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7): 1035-51.
33. Griffiths, R. 2004. Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6): 709-26.
34. Grunig, S. D. 1997. Research, reputation and resources: The effect of research activity on perceptions of undergraduate education and institutional resource acquisition. Journal of Higher Education, 68(1): 17-52.
35. Halse, C., Deane, E., Hobson, J. and Jones, G. 2007. The research-teaching nexus: What do national teaching awards tells us?. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6): 727-46.
36. Hattie, J. and Marsh, H. W. 1996. The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66: 507-42.
37. Henkel, M. 2000. Academic identities and policy change in higher education, London: Jessica Kingsley.
38. Horta, H. 2009. Global and national prominent universities: Internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the state. Higher Education, 58(3): 387-405.
39. Keith, B., Layne, J. S., Babchuk, N. and Johnson, K. 2002. The context of scientific achievement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces, 80(4): 1253-82.
40. Long, J. S. 1978. Productivity and academic position in the academic career. American Sociological Review, 43(6): 889-908.
41. Long, J. S. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables: Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Marsh, H. W. 1987. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11: 253-388.
43. Marsh, H. W. and Dillon, K. E. 1980. Academic productivity and faculty supplemental income. Journal of Higher Education, 51(5): 546-55.
44. Marsh, H. W. and Hattie, J. 2002. The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs?. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5): 604-41.
45. Merton, R. K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159: 56-63.
46. Neumann, R. 1992. Perceptions of the teaching research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23: 159-71.
47. Neumann, R. 1994. The teaching-research nexus: Applying a framework to university students' learning experiences. European Journal of Education, 29: 323-39.
48. Olsen, D. and Simmons, A. J. 1996. The research versus teaching debate: Untangling the relationships. New Directions for Institutional Research, 90: 31-39.
49. Ramsden, P. and Moses, I. 1992. Association between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23: 273-95.
50. Robertson, J. 2007. Beyond the 'research/teaching nexus': Exploring the complexity of academic experience. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5): 541-56.
51. Simons, M. and Elen, J. 2007. The 'research-teaching nexus' and 'education through research': An exploration of ambivalences. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5): 617-31.
52. Tien, F. F. 2000. To what degree does the desire for promotion motivate faculty to perform research: Testing the expectancy theory. Research in Higher Education, 41(6): 723-52.
53. Trice, A. J. 1992. "The tensions between teaching and scholarship". In Chronicle of Higher Education B4
54. Volkwein, J. F. and Carbone, D. 1994. The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 65(2): 147-67.
55. Weesie, J. 1999. Seemingly unrelated estimation. Stata Technical Bulletin, 52: 19-23.
56. Xie, Y. and Shauman, K. 1998. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63: 847-70.