Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 226, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 227-234

  Lundberg, Hannah J ^a   Ngai, Valentina ^a   Wimmer, Markus A ^a,b  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Orthopedic Ambulatory Building ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Knee axial force; Mathematical modeling; Standardized testing protocol; Total knee replacement; Wear testing

Indexed keywords

AXIAL FORCES; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; STANDARDIZED TESTING PROTOCOL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEAR TESTING; CUMULATIVE LOADING; ENDURANCE TESTING; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATIONS; KNEE AXIAL FORCES; MULTIPLE CORRELATION; STANDARDIZED TESTING PROTOCOLS; WEAR-TESTING;

ARTHROPLASTY; AXIAL FLOW; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LOAD TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STANDARDS; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

KNEE PROSTHESES;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84858199693     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411911431650     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 780-785. (Pubitemid 46564282)
2. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404: 7-13. (Pubitemid 35351042)
3. Naudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA and Rorabeck CH. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15(1): 53-64.
4. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The seventh annual report for hip and knee replacement, www.njrcentre.org.uk (accessed 8 September 2011).
5. Crowninshield RD, Rosenberg AG and Sporer SM. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 443: 266-272. (Pubitemid 44324955)
6. Harman MK, Desjardins J, Benson L, et al. Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation. J Orthop Res 2009; 27(4): 540-548.
7. Orozco DA, Schwenke T and Wimmer MA. Wear scar similarities of retrieved and tested tibial components -an artificial neural network approach. In: Annual meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, 2005.
8. Ngai V, Schwenke T and Wimmer MA. In vivo kinematics of knee prosthesis patients during level walking compared with the ISO force-controlled simulator standard. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engng Med 2009; 223(7): 889-896.
9. Ngai V and Wimmer MA. Kinematic evaluation of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement patients during level walking: a comparison with the displacementcontrolled ISO standard. J Biomech 2009; 42(14): 2363-2368.
10. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Perry JP, et al. Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 372: 290-301. (Pubitemid 30159458)
11. Morrison JB. Function of the knee joint in various activities. Bio-Med Engng 1969; 4(12): 573-580.
12. Morrison JB. The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J Biomech 1970; 3(1): 51-61.
13. Heinlein B, Kutzner I, Graichen F, et al. Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months. Clin Biomech 2009; 24(4): 315-326.
14. D'Lima DD, Patil S, Steklov N, et al. Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(2): 255-262. (Pubitemid 43339882)
15. Kutzner I, Heinlein B, Graichen F, et al. Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. J Biomech 2010; 43(11); 2164-2173.
16. Lundberg HJ, Foucher KC and Wimmer MA. A parametric approach to numerical modeling of TKR contact forces. J Biomech 2009; 42(4): 541-545.
17. Lundberg HJ, Foucher KC, Andriacchi TP and Wimmer MA. Comparison of numerically modeled knee joint contact forces to instrumented total knee prosthesis forces. In: ASME summer bioengineering conference, 2009, pp. 379-380.
18. Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ, Toney MK, et al. A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. J. Biomech Engng 1998; 120(6): 743-749. (Pubitemid 29004089)
19. Swanson AJ. In vivo methods for locating the tibio-femoral contact pathway in total knee replacements during gait. MS Thesis in Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA, 2007.
20. Swanson AJ, Ngai V, Inoue N and Wimmer MA. Analysis of the tibio-femoral contact point in total knee replacement using a marker based motion analysis system. In: ASME summer bioengineering conference, 2007, pp. 39-40.
21. Andriacchi TP and Strickland AB. Gait analysis as a tool to assess joint kinetics. In: Berme N, Engin AE and Correia da Silva KM. (eds) Biomechanics of normal and pathological human articulating joints, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff, 1985, pp. 83-100.
22. Wimmer MA and Andriacchi TP. Tractive forces during rolling motion of the knee: implications for wear in total knee replacement. J Biomech 1997; 30(2): 131-137. (Pubitemid 27029791)
23. Lundberg HJ, Foucher KC, Andriacchi TP and Wimmer MA. Direct comparison of measured and calculated TKR force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait pattern. Submitted.
24. In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 2008; 26(9): 1167-1172.
25. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, et al. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res 1989; 7(6): 849-860. (Pubitemid 19271858)
26. Harman MK, Banks SA and Hodge WA. Polyethylene damage and knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 383-393. (Pubitemid 33054970)
27. Thorp LE, Sumner DR, Block JA, et al. Knee joint loading differs in individuals with mild compared with moderate medial knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54(12): 3842-3849. (Pubitemid 44955886)
28. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, p. 567.
29. Rojas IL. Dynamic surface electromyography of total knee replacement patients: muscle activation during gait. MS Thesis in Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA, 2009.
30. D'Lima DD, Steklov N, Patil S and Colwell CW. In vivo knee forces during recreation and exercise after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 66: 2605-2611.
31. Bergmann G. OrthoLoad, http://www.OrthoLoad.com (2008, accessed 2 February 2011).
32. Laz PJ, Pal S, Fields A, et al. Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: a probabilistic study. J Orthopa Res 2006; 24(12): 2212-2221. (Pubitemid 46017196)