In-vivo kinematics of knee prostheses patients during level walking compared with the ISO force-controlled simulator standard

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 223, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 889-896

  Ngai, V ^a   Schwenke, T ^a   Wimmer, M A ^a  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait analysis; Kinematics; Primary and secondary knee motions; Total knee replacement; Wear simulator testing

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR POSTERIORS; FLEXION-EXTENSION; IMPLANT DESIGN; IN-VIVO; KNEE FLEXION ANGLE; KNEE KINEMATICS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE WEAR; LEVEL WALKING; MOTION DATA; MOTION PROFILE; PATTERNS OF MOTION; POINT CLUSTERS; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PRIMARY AND SECONDARY KNEE MOTIONS; ROTATION MOTIONS; ROTATION PATTERN; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEAR SIMULATOR TESTING; WEAR TEST; FLEXION EXTENSION; KNEE MOTION; WEAR SIMULATORS;

GAIT ANALYSIS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); KINEMATICS; LIGAMENTS; ROTATION; SIMULATORS; STANDARDS; TROPICAL ENGINEERING; ARTHROPLASTY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

JOINT PROSTHESES; KNEE PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GAIT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STANDARD; WALKING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WALKING;

EID: 70349467986     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544070JEIM549     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Kurtz, S., Ong, K., Lau, E., Mowat, F., and Halpern, M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 2007, 89, 780-785.
2. Sharkey, P. F., Hozack, W. J., and Rothman, R. H. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 2002, 404, 7-13.
3. Crowninshield, R., Rosenberg, A. G., and Sporer, S. M. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 2006, 443, 266-272.
4. Kurtz, S., Ong, K., Schmier, J., Mowat, F., Saleh, K., Dybyik, E., Karrholm, J., Garellick, G., Havelin, L., Furnes, O., Malchau, H., and Lau, E. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 2007, 89(Suppl. 3), 144-151.
5. DesJardins, J. D., Banks, S. A., Benson, L. C., Pace, T., and LaBerge, M. A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J. Biomech., 2007, 40, 3458-3466.
6. ISO 14243-14251 Implants for surgery - wear of total knee-joint prostheses - part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test, 2002 (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).
7. Zhao, D., Banks, S. A., D'Lima, D. D., Colwell Jr, C. W., and Fregly, B. J. In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities. J. Orthop. Res., 2007, 25, 593-602.
8. Andriacchi, T. P., Dyrby, C. O., and Johnson, T. S. The use of functional analysis in evaluating knee kinematics. Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 2003, 410, 44-53.
9. Schwenke, T., Nechtow, W., Moisio, K., Schneider, E., Jacobs, J., and Wimmer, M. Daily activity profile of patients with total knee replacements. In Transactions of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2006, paper 0625 (Orthopaedic Research Society, Rosemont, Illinois).
10. ASTM F 732-800 Standard test method for wear testing of polymeric materials used in total joint prostheses, 2006 (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
11. ASTM F 2025-2106 Standard practice for gravimetric measurement of polymeric components for wear assessment, 2006 (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
12. Andriacchi, T. P., Alexander, E. J., Toney, M. K., Dyrby, C., and Sum, J. A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1998, 129(6), 743-749.
13. Alexander, E. J. and Andriacchi, T. P. Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. J. Biomech., 2001, 34, 355-361.
14. Andriacchi, T. P. and Dyrby, C. O. Interactions between kinematics and loading during walking for the normal and ACL deficient knee. J. Biomech., 2005, 38, 293-298.
15. Hoppenfeld, S. and Huton, R. Physical examination of the knee. In Physical examination of the spine and extremities (Ed. S. Hoppenfeld), 1976, pp. 171-196 (Appleton-Century-Crofts/ Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
16. Schwenke, T., Orozco, D., Schneider, E., and Wimmer, M. A. Differences in wear between load and displacement control tested total knee replacements. Wear, 2009, 267, 757-762.
17. Stansfield, B. W., Hillman, S. J., Hazlewood, M. E., Lawson, A. A., Mann, A. M., Loudon, I. R., and Robb, J. E. Normalized speed, not age, characterizes ground reaction force patterns in 5- to 12- year-old children walking at self-selected speeds. J. Pediat. Orthop., 2001, 21(3), 395-402.
18. Zhao, D., Banks, S. A., Mitchell, K. H., D'Lima, D. D., Colwell Jr, C. W., and Fregly, B. J. Correlation between the knee adduction torque and medial contact force for a variety of gait patterns. J. Orthop. Res., 2007, 25, 789-797.
19. Paul, P. Differences in polyethylene wear of revised, autopsy retrieved and simulator tested tibial knee implants. Bioengineering MS Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2006.
20. Wimmer, M. A., Paul, P., Haman, J., Schwenke, T., Rosenberg, A. G., and Jacobs, J. J. Differences in damage between revision and postmortem retrieved TKA implants. In Transactions of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2005, poster 1204 (Orthopaedic Research Society, Rosemont, Illinois).
21. Ngai, V. and Wimmer, M. A. Variability in secondary motions of the knee following total joint replacement. In Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, Palo Alto, California, USA, 22-25 August 2007, p. 391 (American Society of Biomechanics, Cleveland, Ohio).
22. ISO 14243-14253 Implants for surgery - wear of total knee-joint prostheses - part 3: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for test, 2004 (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).
23. Haider, H., Alberts, L. R., Laurent, M. P., Johnson, T. S., Yao, J., Gilbertson, L. N., Walker, P. S., Neff, J. R., and Garvin, K. L. Comparison between forcecontrolled and displacement-controlled in-vitro wear testing on a widely used TKR implant. In Transactions of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2002, poster 1007 (Orthopaedic Research Society, Rosemont, Illinois).
24. Benson, L. C., DesJardins, J. D., Harman, M. K., and LaBerge, M. Effect of stair descent loading on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear in a force-controlled knee simulator. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2002, 216, 409-418. DOI: 10.1243/095441102321032201. (Pubitemid 35459407)
25. van Houtem, M., Clough, R., Khan, A., Harrison, M., and Blunn, G. W. Validation of the soft tissue restraints in a force-controlled knee simulator. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220, 449-456. DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM57. (Pubitemid 46116945)