Muscle discretization affects the loading transferred to bones in lower-limb musculoskeletal models

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 226, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 161-169

  Valente, Giordano ^a,b   Martelli, Saulo ^a   Taddei, Fulvia ^a   Farinella, Giovanna ^a   Viceconti, Marco ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Lower limb; Muscle discretization; Muscle mechanical effect; Range of motion of joints; Subject specific musculoskeletal modelling

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL REGIONS; BIOMECHANICAL APPLICATION; CADAVER SPECIMEN; CLINICAL IMAGES; DATA COLLECTION; DISCRETIZATIONS; GENERAL METHOD; GENERALIZED FORCE; LINES OF ACTION; LOWER LIMB; MECHANICAL EFFECTS; MUSCLE LOADING; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; RANGE OF MOTIONS; REDUCED REPRESENTATION; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC; MUSCLE DISCRETIZATION; MUSCLE MECHANICAL EFFECTS; RANGE OF MOTION OF JOINTS; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELLING;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DATA ACQUISITION; ERRORS; JOINTS (ANATOMY); LOADING; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM;

MUSCLE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; JOINT; LEG; MECHANICAL STRESS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

BONE AND BONES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; JOINTS; LEG; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84858176450     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411911425863     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Erdemir A, McLean S, Herzog W, et al. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22(2): 131-154. (Pubitemid 46038888)
2. Piazza SJ. Muscle-driven forward dynamic simulations for the study of normal and pathological gait. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006; 3; 5.
3. Hoy MG, Zajac FE and Gordon ME. A musculoskeletal model of the human lower extremity: the effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment-angle relationship of musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle. J Biomech 1990; 23(2): 157-169. (Pubitemid 20104614)
4. Jonkers I, Stewart C and Spaepen A. The study of muscle action during single support and swing phase of gait: clinical relevance of forward simulation techniques. Gait Posture 2003; 17(2): 97-105. (Pubitemid 36299149)
5. Thelen DG, Anderson FC and Delp SL. Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J Biomech 2003; 36(3): 321-328. (Pubitemid 36197670)
6. Higginson JS, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, et al. Muscle contributions to support during gait in an individual with post-stroke hemiparesis. J Biomech 2006; 39(10): 1769-1777. (Pubitemid 43946442)
7. Kepple TM, Sommer HJ 3rd, Lohmann Siegel K, et al. A three-dimensional musculoskeletal database for the lower extremities. J Biomech 1998; 31(1): 77-80. (Pubitemid 28192652)
8. Anderson FC and Pandy MG. Dynamic optimization of human walking. J Biomech Eng 2001; 123(5): 381-390. (Pubitemid 32938934)
9. Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, et al. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990; 37(8): 757-767. (Pubitemid 20324141)
10. Scheys L, Van Campenhout A, Spaepen A, et al. Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. Gait Posture 2008; 28(3): 358-365.
11. Brand RA, Crowninshield RD, Wittstock CE, et al. A model of lower extremity muscular anatomy. J Biomech Eng 1982; 104(4): 304-310.
12. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 2001; 34(7): 883-893. (Pubitemid 32530056)
13. Besier TF, Gold GE, Beaupre GS, et al. A modeling framework to estimate patellofemoral joint cartilage stress in vivo. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37(11): 1924-1930. (Pubitemid 41691836)
14. Hicks J, Arnold A, Anderson F, et al. The effect of excessive tibial torsion on the capacity of muscles to extend the hip and knee during single-limb stanceGait Posture 2007; 26(4): 546-552. (Pubitemid 47432846)
15. Lenaerts G, De Groote F, Demeulenaere B, et al. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait. J Biomech 2008; 41(6): 1243-1252.
16. Jonkers I, Sauwen N, Lenaerts G, et al. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. J Biomech 2008; 41(16): 3405-3413.
17. Delp SL and Loan JP. A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. Comput Biol Med 1995; 25(1): 21-34.
18. Horsman K, Koopman HFJM, Van Der Helm FCT, et al. Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22(2): 239-247. (Pubitemid 46038894)
19. Van Der Helm FC and Veenbaas R. Modelling the mechanical effect of muscles with large attachment sites: application to the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 1991; 24(12): 1151-1163.
20. Duda GN, Brand D, Freitag S, et al. Variability of femoral muscle attachments. J Biomech 1996; 29(9): 1185-1190. (Pubitemid 26302184)
21. Viceconti M, Clapworthy G and Van Sint Jan S. The Virtual Physiological Human - a European initiative for in silico human modelling. J Physiol Sci 2008; 58(7): 441-446.
22. Testi D, Quadrani P and Viceconti M. PhysiomeSpace: digital library service for biomedical data. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2010; 368(1921): 2853-2861.
23. Van Der Helm FC, Veeger HE, Pronk GM, et al. Geometry parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the shoulder system. J Biomech 1992; 25(2): 129-144.
24. Walker SM and Schrodt GR. I segment lengths and thin filament periods in skeletal muscle fibers of the Rhesus monkey and the human. Anat Rec 1974; 178(1): 63-81.
25. Taddei F, Ansaloni M, Testi D, et al. Virtual palpation of skeletal landmarks with multimodal display interfaces. Med Inform Internet Med 2007; 32(3): 191-198. (Pubitemid 47299526)
26. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 2002; 35(4); 543-548. (Pubitemid 34273649)
27. Tanavalee A, Yuktanandana P and Ngarmukos C. Surgical epicondylar axis vs anatomical epicondylar axis for rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 2001; 84(Suppl 1): S401-S408. (Pubitemid 33714874)
28. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Nemeth G, et al. The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71(1): 94-99. (Pubitemid 19049591)
29. Wu G and Cavanagh PR. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomech 1995; 28(10): 1257-1261.
30. Boone DC and Azen SP. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61(5): 756-759. (Pubitemid 9232034)
31. Xiao M and Higginson J. Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking. J Appl Biomech 2010; 26(2): 142-149.
32. Cleather DI and Bull AM. Lower-extremity musculoskeletal geometry affects the calculation of patellofemoral forces in vertical jumping and weightlifting. Proc IMechE Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2010; 224(9): 1073-1083.