Low vision rehabilitation plans comparing two intake methods

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 203-214

  Bruijning, Janna ^a   Van Nispen, Ruth ^a   Knol, Dirk ^a   Van Rens, Ger ^a,b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ELKERLIEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activities and participation; Activity inventory; Goal setting; ICF; Low vision; Patient files; Patient centered; Questionnaire; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES AND PARTICIPATION; GOAL SETTING; ICF; LOW VISION; PATIENT FILES; PATIENT-CENTERED; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DECISION MAKING; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; RATING;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL DISORDER;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION, LOW;

EID: 84858153541     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31823e3217     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Turner-Stokes L. Politics, policy and payment-facilitators or barriers to person-centred rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29: 1575-82.
2. de Haes H, Bensing J. Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009;74:287-94.
3. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 39:17-25.
4. Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Taylor WJ. Toward a cognitive-affective model of goal-setting in rehabilitation: Is self-regulation theory a key step? Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1175-83. (Pubitemid 39335148)
5. Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Haines T. Patient centered goalsetting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32: 159-72.
6. Pollock N. Client-centered assessment. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47: 298-301.
7. Battersby M, Von Korff M, Schaefer J, Davis C, Ludman E, Greene SM, Parkerton M, Wagner EH. Twelve evidence-based principles for implementing self-management support in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36:561-70.
8. Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008;77:219-26. (Pubitemid 351685446)
9. Schulman-Green DJ, Naik AD, Bradley EH, McCorkle R, Bogardus ST. Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy amongclinicians and their older patients. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63: 145-51. (Pubitemid 44331544)
10. Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:756-72. (Pubitemid 46940501)
11. Rushton PW, Miller WC. Goal attainment scaling in the rehabilitation of patients with lower-extremity amputations: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:771-5. (Pubitemid 34721475)
12. Rockwood K, Joyce B, Stolee P. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:581-8. (Pubitemid 27270207)
13. Bogardus ST, Jr., Bradley EH, Williams CS, Maciejewski PK, Gallo WT, Inouye SK. Achieving goals in geriatric assessment: Role of caregiver agreement and adherence to recommendations. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:99-105. (Pubitemid 38090397)
14. Turner-Stokes L, Baguley IJ, De Graaff S, Katrak P, Davies L, Mc-Crory P, Hughes A. Goal attainment scaling in the evaluation of treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin: A secondary analysis from a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:81-9.
15. Stelmack JA, Tang XC, Reda DJ, Rinne S, Mancil RM, Massof RW. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:608-17. (Pubitemid 351679554)
16. Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K, Rees G, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48: 1476-82. (Pubitemid 351261328)
17. Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K, Tennant A, Rees G, O'Connor PM, Keeffe JE. Assessing participation in daily living and the effectiveness of rehabiliation in age related macular degeneration patients using the impact of vision impairment scale. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2008;15:105-13. (Pubitemid 351574441)
18. Rees G, Keeffe JE, Hassell J, Larizza M, Lamoureux E. A selfmanagement program for low vision: Program overview and pilot evaluation. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:808-15.
19. Stelmack J. Quality of life of low-vision patients and outcomes of low-vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:335-42. (Pubitemid 32493436)
20. Stelmack JA, Moran D, Dean D, Massof RW. Short-and long-term effects of an intensive inpatient vision rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:691-5. (Pubitemid 46802410)
21. Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL. Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:793-802.
22. de Boer MR, Moll AC, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: A systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24:257-73.
23. Langelaan M, de Boer MR, van Nispen RM, Wouters B, Moll AC, van Rens GH. Change in quality of life after rehabilitation: Prognostic factors for visually impaired adults. Int J Rehabil Res 2009;32: 12-9.
24. van Nispen RM, Knol DL, Neve HJ, van Rens GH. A multilevel item response theory model was investigated for longitudinal vision-related quality-of-life data. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63: 321-30.
25. van Nispen RM, Knol DL, Langelaan M, de Boer MR, Terwee CB, van Rens GH. Applying multilevel item response theory to visionrelated quality of life in Dutch visually impaired elderly. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:710-20. (Pubitemid 47262981)
26. Burggraaff MC, van Nispen RM, Melis-Dankers BJ, van Rens GH. Effects of standard training in the use of closed-circuit televisions in visually impaired adults: Design of a training protocol and a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10:62.
27. Zijlstra GA, van Rens GH, Scherder EJ, Brouwer DM, van der Velde J, Verstraten PF, Kempen GI. Effects and feasibility of a standardised orientation and mobility training in using an identification cane for older adults with low vision: Design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:153.
28. Massof RW. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. I. Basic concepts. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:725-36.
29. Massof RW. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. II. Measurement of vision disabilities. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:349-73. (Pubitemid 28268555)
30. Massof RW, Hsu CT, Baker FH, Barnett GD, Park WL, Deremeik JT, Rainey C, Epstein C. Visual disability variables. I: The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:946-53. (Pubitemid 40692362)
31. Massof RW, Hsu CT, Baker FH, Barnett GD, Park WL, Deremeik JT, Rainey C, Epstein C. Visual disability variables. II: The difficulty of tasks for a sample of low-vision patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:954-67. (Pubitemid 40692363)
32. Massof RW, Ahmadian L, Grover LL, Deremeik JT, Goldstein JE, Rainey C, Epstein C, Barnett GD. The Activity Inventory: An adaptive visual function questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84: 763-74. (Pubitemid 47262987)
33. Bruijning J, van Nispen R, Verstraten P, van Rens G. A Dutch ICF version of the Activity Inventory: Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons and experts. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010; 17:366-77.
34. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
35. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:932-8. (Pubitemid 36002173)
36. Bruijning JE, van Nispen RM, van Rens GH. Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: A pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10:318.
37. De Boer MR, Langelaan M, Jansonius NM, Van Rens GH. Evidence-based guidelines on the referral of visually impaired persons to low vision services. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:400-6. (Pubitemid 40943940)
38. World Health Organization. Change the Definition of Blindness. Available at: Http://www.who.int/blindness/Change%20the% 20Definition%20of%20Blindness. pdf. Accessed May 4, 2010.
39. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
40. Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Kennedy GJ. Major and subthreshold depression among older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005;13:180-7. (Pubitemid 41031085)
41. van Nispen RM, de Boer MR, Hoeijmakers JG, Ringens PJ, van Rens GH. Co-morbidity and visual acuity are risk factors for health-related quality of life decline: Five-month follow-up EQ-5D data of visually impaired older patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009;7:18.
42. Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008; 44:329-42.