The actualization of neoliberal space and the loss of housing affordability in Santa Monica, California

Geoforum

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 453-463

  Kamel, Nabil ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Costa Hawkins Act; Disaster; Gentrification; Northridge earthquake; Rent control; Uneven development; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; AFFORDABLE HOUSING; DEREGULATION; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GENTRIFICATION; HOUSING CONDITIONS; LEGISLATION; NEOLIBERALISM; POLICY REFORM; RENT CONTROL; UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

CALIFORNIA; SANTA MONICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84858152452     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Angotti T. New York for Sale: Community Planning Confronts Global Real Estate 2008, MIT Press, Boston.
2. Arrighi G. Spatial and other 'fixes' of historical Capitalism. Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives 2006, 201-212. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. C. Chase-Dunn, S. Babones (Eds.).
3. Barnett C. The consolations of 'neoliberalism'. Geoforum 2005, 36(1):7-12.
4. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), 2009. Gross Domestic Product by State. http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/reis/scb.cfm.
5. Beauregard R. Federal policy and postwar urban decline: a case of government complicity?. Housing Policy Debate 2001, 12(1):129-151.
6. Bolin R., Stanford L. The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster 1998, Routledge, New York.
7. Brenner N., Theodore N. Cities and the geographies of 'actually existing neoliberalism'. Antipode 2002, 34(3):349-379.
8. Brenner N., Peck J., Theodore N. Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 2010, 10(2):182-222.
9. Bureau of the Census, 1990. Decennial Census: 1990 Summary Tape files 1 and 3. US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
10. Bureau of the Census, 2000. Decennial Census: 2000 Summary Files 1A and 3A. US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
11. Bureau of the Census, 2006-2008. American Community Survey Three-year Estimate. US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
12. čapek S., Gilderbloom J. Community versus Commodity: Tenants and the American City 1992, State University of New York Press, Albany.
13. City of Santa Monica, 1994. Earthquake Recovery Project. City of Santa Monica Planning Department, Santa Monica.
14. City of Santa Monica, 1996. Santa Monica Rent Control Board Annual Report. City of Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
15. City of Santa Monica, 1997. Santa Monica Rent Control Board Annual Report. City of Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
16. City of Santa Monica, 1998. Santa Monica Rent Control Board Annual Report. City of Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
17. City of Santa Monica, 1999. Status Report: Santa Monica Five Years after the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake. Internal memorandum. City Management Services and Governmental Affairs, Santa Monica, CA.
18. City of Santa Monica, 2001. Multifamily Earthquake Repair Loan Program. City of Santa Monica, Santa Monica (2001 update).
19. City of Santa Monica, 2002. Election 2002: Santa Monica Municipal Election Information. http://www01.smgov.net/cityclerk/Election2002/.
20. City of Santa Monica, 2003. The Impact of the Ellis Act: July 1986-June 2003. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
21. City of Santa Monica, 2006. Rent Control Charter Amendment. Individual Rent Adjustments, Rent Control Charter Amendment. City of Santa Monica, Santa Monica (Chapter 4).
22. City of Santa Monica, 2009. Santa Monica Rent Control Board Annual Report. City of Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
23. City of Santa Monica, 2009a. The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Ten-Year Report. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
24. City of Santa Monica, 2010. The Impact of the Ellis Act: January-December 2009. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Santa Monica.
25. Clavel P. The Progressive City: Planning and Participation 1986, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
26. Coakley J. The integration of property and financial markets. Environment and Planning A 1994, 26(5):697-713.
27. Comerio M. Disaster Hits Home: New Policy for Urban Housing Recovery 1998, University of California Press, Berkeley.
28. Comerio, M. et al., 1996. Residential Earthquake Recovery: Improving California's Post-disaster Rebuilding Policies and Programs. California Policy Seminar, University of California, Berkeley.
29. Crump J. Deconcentration by demolition: public housing, poverty, and urban policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2002, 20(5):581-596.
30. Das, A., Takahashi, L., 2009. Evolving Institutional Arrangements, Scaling up, and Sustainability: Emerging Issues. Participatory Slum Upgrading in Ahmadabad, India, vol. 29, pp. 213-232.
31. Dreier, P., 1997. Rent deregulation in California and Massachusetts: politics, policy, and impacts. In: Paper Presented at the Housing '97 Conference, New York, NY.
32. Duménil G., Lévy D. Capital Resurgent: Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution 2004, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
33. Elwood S. Neighborhood revitalization through 'collaboration': assessing the implications of neoliberal urban policy at the grassroots. GeoJournal 2002, 58:121-130.
34. EQE International, 1995. The Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: Report of data Collection and Analysis. Prepared by EQE International Inc. and the Geographic Information Systems Group of the Governor's Office of Emergency Services of the State of California, Sacramento.
35. Fainstein S. Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2009, 32(4):768-785.
36. Feagin J. The secondary circuit of capital: office construction in Houston, Texas. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1987, 11(2):172-192.
37. Friedman M. Capitalism and Freedom 1962, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1962).
38. Gillespie, N., 1994. Rending Rent Control. http://www.reason.com/news/show/29446.html.
39. Giroux H. Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: the university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review 2002, 72(4):425-463.
40. Hackworth J., Moriah A. Neoliberalism, contingency and urban policy: the case of social housing in Ontario. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2006, 30(3):510-527.
41. Hackworth J., Smith N. The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2001, 92:464-477.
42. Harris, B., 2003. L.A. County Home Prices Soar. Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles. http://www.articles.latimes.co.
43. Harvey D. The Limits to Capital 1982, Blackwell, Oxford.
44. Harvey D. From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation of Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 1989, 71(1):3-17.
45. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism 2005, Oxford University Press, New York.
46. Harvey D. Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2007, 610(1):21-44.
47. Hayek F. The Constitution of Liberty 1960, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
48. Hayes, R., 2009. Tiny Apartments Big Hit in Santa Monica. ABC News. http://www.abclocal.go.com/kabc/story.
49. Heskin A. Tenants and the American Dream: Ideology and the Tenant Movement 1983, Praeger, New York.
50. Hill-Holtzman N. Residents, whose Apartments are Still Uninhabitable, could be Priced out of their Homes 1994, Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, June 26.
51. Hsin, M., 2009. Santa Monica's Olympic Studios are Small but Stylish. Los Angeles Times. http://www.articles.latimes.com.
52. HUD - US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1993. Worst Case Needs for Housing Assistance in the United States in 1990 and 1991. Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington DC.
53. HUD - US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2007. Affordable Housing Needs 2005: Report to Congress. Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington DC.
54. HUD - US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2010. State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS): Building Permits Database. http://www.socds.huduser.org/index.html.
55. Hull R. The great lie: markets, freedom and knowledge. Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique 2006, Routledge, New York. D. Plehwe, B. Walpen, G. Neunhöffer (Eds.).
56. Jessop B. Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: a state-theoretical perspective. Antipode 2002, 34(3):452-472.
57. Kamel N., Loukaitou-Sideris A. Residential assistance and recovery following the Northridge earthquake. Urban Studies 2004, 41(3):533-562.
58. Kaplan S. Perspectives on Rebuilding: Someone has to Pay for it 1994, Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, January 28, p. B7.
59. Klein N. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism 2007, Metropolitan Books, New York.
60. Leamer E. Bubble Trouble 2002, University of California Anderson Forecast, Los Angeles.
61. Lees L. Super-gentrification: the case of Brooklyn heights, New York City. Urban Studies 2003, 40(12):2487-2509.
62. Leitner H. Capital markets, the development industry, and urban office market dynamics: rethinking building cycles. Environment and Planning A 1994, 26(5):779-802.
63. Leitner H., Sheppard E. Economic uncertainty, inter-urban competition, and the efficacy of entrepreneurialism. The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation 1998, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York. T. Hall, P. Hubbard (Eds.).
64. Levine N., et al. Who benefits from rent control? Effects on tenants in Santa Monica, California. Journal of the American Planning Association 1990, 56(2):140-152.
65. Macleod G., Goodwin M. Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography 1999, 23(4):503-527.
66. Malpass P. Housing policy and the disabling of local authorities. Housing Policy in the 1990s 2003, 10-28. Routledge, New York, NY. J. Birchall (Ed.).
67. Meyers D., Ryu S. Aging baby boomers and the generational housing bubble: foresight and mitigation of an epic transition. Journal of the American Planning Association 2008, 74(1):17-33.
68. Miraftab F. Neoliberalism and casualization of public sector services: the case of waste collection services in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2003, 28(4):874-892.
69. Mirowski P., Plehwe D. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective 2009, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
70. Mollenkopf J. The Politics of Urban Development 1983, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
71. Mollenkopf J., Castells M. Dual City: Restructuring New York 1991, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
72. Newman K., Ashton P. Neoliberal urban policy and new paths of neighborhood change in the American inner city. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36(7):1151-1172.
73. Newman K., Wyly E. The Right to stay put, revisited: gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies 2006, 43(1):23-57.
74. Office of Emergency Services of the State of California (OES), 1997. Residential Damage and Individual Assistance Database, 1997 Update. Governor's Office of Emergency Services, Sacramento.
75. Official California Legislative Information, 2009. Government Code Section 7060-7060.7. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=govandgroup=07001-08000andfile=7060-7060.7.
76. Peck J. Liberating the City: between New York and New Orleans. Urban Geography 2006, 27(8):681-713.
77. Peck J., Tickell A. Local modes of social regulation? Regulation theory, Thatcherism and uneven development. Geoforum 1992, 23(3):347-363.
78. Pierson P. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
79. Popkin S., et al. The HOPE VI program: what about the residents?. Housing Policy Debate 2004, 15(2):385-414.
80. Rackham A. Landlords use earthquake losses to push for limits on rent control. Los Angeles Business Journal 1994, August 8.
81. RAND California, 2009. Housing Prices and Transaction Statistics. Reported from the California Association of Realtors. http://www.ca.rand.org/stats/economics/houseprice.html.
82. RAND California, 2009a. New Construction by City Statistics. Reported from the Construction Industry Research Board. http://www.ca.rand.org/stats/economics/construct.html.
83. Rothenberg J., et al. The Maze of Urban Housing Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Policy 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
84. Saulsbury, V., Curry, T., 1997. History of the 80s: Lessons for the Future, vo.1: An Examination of the Banking Crises of the 1980s and early 1990s. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Research and Statistics, Washington, DC.
85. Seeley R. How eager will landlords be to help Santa Monicans for Renters Right?. The Outlook 1994, February 1.
86. Smith N. Toward a theory of gentrification a back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association 1979, 45(4):538-548.
87. Smith N. New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 2002, 34(3):427-450.
88. Springer S. The nonillusory effects of neoliberalisation: linking geographies of poverty, inequality, and violence. Geoforum 2008, 39(4):1520-1525.
89. Springer S. Violence, Democracy, and the Neoliberal " Order": the contestation of public space in posttransitional Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2009, 99(1):138-162.
90. Springer S. Neoliberalism and Geography: Expansions, Variegations, Formations. Geography Compass 2010, 4(8):1025-1038.
91. State of California Department of Finance, 1995. California Statistical Abstract 1995. Department of Finance, Sacramento.
92. Strickland, D., 2002. It's a Builder's Market as the Surge in House Hunting Continues Apace. Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles. May 27. http://www.articles.latimes.com/2002/may/27/business/fi-builders27.
93. Sturak, C., 2000. New, Different Affordable Housing, Colorado Court, is rising. Santa Monica Mirror December 6-12, vol. 2, No. 25, p. 8.
94. Teitz M. Neighborhood economics: local communities and regional markets. Economic Development Quarterly 1989, 3(2):111-122.
95. Tucker, W., 1991. Zoning, Rent Control, and Affordable Housing. Cato Institute, Washington, DC.
96. Walker M., et al. Neoliberal development through technical assistance: constructing communities of entrepreneurial subjects in Oaxaca, Mexico. Geoforum 2008, 39(1):527-542.
97. Ward K., England K. Introduction: reading neoliberalization. Neoliberalization: States, Networks, Peoples 2007, Blackwell Publishing, Malden. K. England, K. Ward (Eds.).
98. Weber R. Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode 2002, 34(3):519-540.
99. Wilson D. Toward a contingent urban neoliberalism. Urban Geography 2004, 25(8):771-783.
100. Wood J. Landlords Accused of 'Circumventing' the System 2003, Santa Monica Daily Press, Santa Monica.