Sensitivity analysis of probabilistic networks

Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing

Volumn 213, Issue , 2007, Pages 103-124

  van der Gaag, Linda C ^a   Renooij, Silja ^a   Coupé, Veerle M H ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250316527     PISSN: 14349922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68996-6_5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. E. Castillo, J.M. Gutiérrez and A.S. Hadi (1997). Sensitivity analysis in discrete Bayesian networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 27, pp. 412-423.
2. H. Chan and A. Darwiche (2002). When do numbers really matter? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 17, pp. 265-287.
3. H. Chan and A. Darwiche (2002). A distance measure for bounding probabilistic belief change. Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp. 539-545.
4. H. Chan and A. Darwiche (2004). Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian networks: From single to multiple parameters. In: M. Chickering, J. Halpern (editors), Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, AUAI Press, Arlington, VA, pp. 67-75.
5. G.F. Cooper (1984). NESTOR: A Computer-based Medical Diagnostic Aid that Integrates Causal and Probabilistic Knowledge, Report HPP-84-48, Stanford University.
6. V.M.H. Coupé and L.C. van der Gaag (1998). Practicable sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks. In: M. Hušková, P. Lachout, J.A. Víšek (editors), Prague Stochastics '98, Union of Czech Mathematicians and Physicists, Prague, pp. 81-86; also available as Report UU-CS-1998-10, Utrecht University.
7. V.M.H. Coupé, L.C. van der Gaag and J.D.F. Habbema (2000). Sensitivity analysis: An aid for probability elicitation. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 15, pp. 1-18.
8. V.M.H. Coupé, F.V. Jensen, U. Kjærulff and L.C. van der Gaag (2000). A computational architecture for n-way sensitivity analysis of Bayesian networks. Technical Report, Aalborg University.
9. V.M.H. Coupé and L.C. van der Gaag (2002). Properties of sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, pp. 323-356.
10. A. Darwiche (2003). A differential approach to inference in Bayesian networks. Journal of the ACM, vol. 50, pp. 280-305.
11. M.J. Druzdzel and L.C. van der Gaag (1995). Elicitation of probabilities for belief networks: Combining qualitative and quantitative information. In: P. Besnard, S. Hanks (editors), Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, pp. 141-148.
12. L.C. van der Gaag and V.M.H. Coupé (1999). Sensitivity analysis for threshold decision making with Bayesian belief networks. In: E. Lamma, P. Mello (editors), AI*IA 99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 37-48.
13. L.C. van der Gaag and S. Renooij (2001). Analysing sensitivity data from probabilistic networks. In: J. Breese, D. Koller (editors), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp. 530-537.
14. L.C. van der Gaag and S. Renooij (2006). On the sensitivity of probabilistic networks to reliability characteristics. In: B. Bouchon-Meunier, G. Coletti and R.R. Yager (editors), Modern Information Processing: From Theory to Applications, Elsevier B.V., pp. 395-405.
15. F.V. Jensen, S.L. Lauritzen and K.G. Oleson (1990). Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computations. Computational Statistics Quarterly, vol. 4, pp. 269-282.
16. U. Kjærulff and L.C. van der Gaag (2000). Making sensitivity analysis computationally efficient. In: G. Boutilier, M. Goldszmidt (editors), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp. 317-325.
17. K.B. Laskey (1995). Sensitivity analysis for probability assessments in Bayesian networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics vol. 25, pp. 901-909.
18. S.L. Lauritzen and D.J. Spiegelhalter (1988). Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, vol. 50, pp. 157-224.
19. S.G. Pauker and J.P. Kassirer (1980). The threshold approach to clinical decision making. New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 302, pp. 1109-1117.
20. J. Pearl (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto.
21. S. Renooij and L.C. van der Gaag (2004). Evidence-invariant sensitivity bounds. In: M. Chickering, J. Halpern (editors), Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, AUAI Press, Arlington, VA, pp. 479-486.
22. S. Renooij and L.C. van der Gaag (2005). Exploiting evidence-dependent sensitivity bounds. In: F. Bacchus, T. Jaakkola (editors), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR, pp. 485-492.
23. G. Shafer and P.P. Shenoy (1990) Probability propagation. Annals of Mathematics in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 327-352.