Evolution of gynoecium morphology in Old World Papaveroideae: A combined phylogenetic/ontogenetic approach

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1243-1251

  Kadereit, Joachim W ^a   Erbar, Claudia ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gynoecium; Meconopsis; Ontogeny; Papaver; Papaveroideae; Phylogeny; Stylomecon

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; HOMOLOGY; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; ONTOGENY; PARALLEL EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RECONSTRUCTION; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CHIMERA; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PAPAVER; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SELF FERTILIZATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHIMERA; FLOWERS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PAPAVER; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; SELF-FERTILIZATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

MECONOPSIS; MECONOPSIS CAMBRICA; PAPAVER; PAPAVER CALIFORNICUM; PAPAVER RHOEAS; ROEMERIA; STYLOMECON; STYLOMECON HETEROPHYLLA;

EID: 84858081600     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100066     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. S. Shore. 2008. New insights on heterostyly, comparative biology, ecology and genetics. In V. E. Franklin-Tong [ed.], Self-incompatibility in flowering plants-Evolution, diversity and mechanisms, 3-32. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
2. Carolan, J. C., I. L. I. Hook, M. W. Chase, J. W. Kadereit, and T. R. Hodkinson. 2006. Phylogenetics of Papaver and related genera based on DNA sequences from ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid trnL intron and trnL-F intergenic spacers. Annals of Botany 98: 141-155.
3. Erbar, C. 1991. Sympetaly-A systematic character? Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 112: 417-451.
4. Erbar, C., and P. Leins. 2011. Synopsis of some important, non-DNA character states in the asterids with special reference to sympetaly. Plant Diversity and Evolution 129.
5. Ernst, W. R. 1962. A comparative morphology of the Papaveraceae. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
6. Faegri, K., and L. van der Pijl. 1979. The principles of pollination biology, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
7. Hufford, L. 1997. The roles of ontogenetic evolution in the origins of floral homoplasies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (Supplement): S65-S80.
8. Hufford, L. 2001. Ontogenetic sequences: Homology, evolution, and the patterning of clade diversity. In M. L. Zelditch [ed.], Beyond heterochrony: The evolution of development, 27-57. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
9. Kadereit, J. W. 1989. A revision of Papaver L. sect. Rhoeadium Spach (Papaveraceae). Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 45: 225-286.
10. Kadereit, J. W., and B. G. Baldwin. In press. Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of Papaver californicum and Stylomecon heterophylla (Papaveraceae). Madroño
11. Kadereit, J. W., F. R. Blattner, K. Jork, and A. E. Schwarzbach. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of the Papaveraceae s.l. (incl. Fumariaceae, Hypecoaceae, and Pteridophyllum) based on morphological characters. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 116: 361-390.
12. Kadereit, J. W., A. E. Schwarzbach, and K. B. Jork. 1997. The phylogeny of Papaver s.l. (Papaveraceae): Polyphyly or monophyly? Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 75-98.
13. Kelly, L. M. 1997. A cladistic analysis of Asarum (Aristolochiaceae) and implications for the evolution of herkogamy. American Journal of Botany 84: 1752-1765.
14. Leins, P. 1964. Die frühe Blütenentwicklung von Hypericum hookerianum Wight et Arn. und H. aegypticum L. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 77: 112-123.
15. Leins, P., and C. Erbar. 2010. Flower and fruit: Morphology, ontogeny, phylogeny, function and ecology. Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany.
16. Proctor, M., P. Yeo, and A. Lack. 1996. The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland Oregon, USA.
17. Remane, A. 1952. Die Grundlagen des Natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest und Portig, Leipzig, Germany.
18. Ronse Decraene, L. P., and E. Smets. 1995. The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 118: 193-247.
19. Schwarzbach, A., and J. W. Kadereit. 1995. Rapid radiation of North American desert genera of the Papaveraceae: Evidence from restriction site mapping of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA fragments. Plant Systematics and Evolution, Supplementum 9: 159-170.
20. Wake, D. B., M. H. Wake, and C. D. Specht. 2011. Homoplasy: From detecting pattern to determining process and mechanism of evolution. Science 331: 1032-1035.