Phylogenetics of Papaver and related genera based on DNA sequences from ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid trnL intron and trnL-F intergenic spacers

Annals of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 141-155

  Carolan, James C ^a,d   Hook, Ingrid L I ^a   Chase, Mark W ^b   Kadereit, Joachim W ^c   Hodkinson, Trevor R ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

DNA; Meconopsis; nrITS; Papaver; Phylogenetics; Roemeria; Stylomecon; trnL F

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; SPACER DNA;

DATA SET; DNA; FLORA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; GENETICS; INTRON; PAPAVER; PAPAVERACEAE; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID;

DNA, INTERGENIC; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; GENES, PLANT; INTRONS; PAPAVER; PAPAVERACEAE; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

MECONELLA; MECONOPSIS; MECONOPSIS CAMBRICA; PAPAVER; ROEMERIA; ROEMERIA REFRACTA; STYLOMECON;

EID: 33745726882     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl079     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Cambell CS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
2. Bittkau C, Kadereit JW. 2002. Phylogenetic and geographical relationships in Papaver alpinum L. (Papaveraceae) based on RAPD data. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 123: 463-479.
3. Carolan JC. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Papaver L. PhD thesis, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland.
4. Carolan JC, Hook ILI, Walsh JJ, Hodkinson TR. 2002. Using AFLP markers for species differentiation and assessment of genetic variability of in vitro cultured Papaver bracteatum (section Oxytona). In vitro cellular and developmental biology. Plant 38: 300-307.
5. Chase MW, de Bruijn AY, Reeves G, Cox AV, Rudall PJ, Johnson MAT, Eguiarte LE. 2000. Phylogenetics of Asphodelaceae (Asparagales): an analysis of plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Annals of Botany 86: 935-956.
6. Cordell GA. 1981. Alkaloids derived from phenylalanine and tyrosine. In: Cordell GA, ed. Introduction to alkaloids: a biogenetic approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 490-512.
7. Cullen J. 1965. Papaveraceae. In: Davis PH, ed. Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean Islands, Vol. I. Edinburgh: University Press, 213-247.
8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletins 19: 11-15.
9. Ernst WR. 1962. A comparative morphology of the Papaveraceae. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
10. Fedde F. 1909. Papaveraceae-Hypecoideae et Papaveraceae-Papaveroideae. In: Engler A, ed. Das Pflanzenreich. Leipzig: Englemann, 228.
11. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
12. Gielly LP, Taberlet P. 1996. A phylogeny of the European gentians interred from chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 120: 57-75.
13. Gielly LP, Yuan YM, Kupfer P, Taberlet P. 1994. Phylogenetic use of noncoding regions in the genus Gentiana L.: chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron versus nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 460-466.
14. Goldblatt P. 1974. Biosystematic studies in Papaver section Oxytona. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 61: 264-296.
15. Günther KF. 1975. Beitrage zur Morphologie und Verbreitung der Papaveraceae 2. Teil: Die Wuchsformen der Papaverae, Escoscholzieae und Platystemonoideae. Flora 164: 393-436.
16. Hammer K, Fritsch R. 1977. Zur Frage nach der Ursprungsart des Kulturmohns (Papaver somniferum L.). Kulturpflanze 25: 113-124.
17. Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Takahashi C, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Renvoize SA. 2002. The use of DNA sequencing (ITS and trnL-F), AFLP and fluorescent in-situ hybridisation to study allopolyploid Miscanthus (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 279-286.
18. Hopper SD, Fay MF, Rossetto M, Chase MW. 1999 A molecular phylogenetic analysis of the bloodroot and kangaroo paw family, Haemodoraceae: taxonomic, biogeographic and conservation implications. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 285-299.
19. Jork KB, Kadereit JW. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of the Old World representatives of Papaveraceae subf. Papaveroideae with special emphasis on the genus Meconopsis Vig. In: Jensen U, Kadereit JW, eds. Systematics and evolution of the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 9 (Suppl.): 171-180.
20. Kadereit JW. 1986a. A revision of Papaver section Argemonidium. Notes of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 44: 25-43.
21. Kadereit JW. 1986b. A revision of Papaver L. sect Papaver (Papaveraceae). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 108: 1-16.
22. Kadereit JW. 1987. A revision of Papaver sect Carinatae (Papaveraceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 7: 501-504.
23. Kadereit JW. 1988a. Sectional affinities and geographical distribution in the genus Papaver L. (Papaveraceae). Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 63: 139-156.
24. Kadereit JW. 1988b. Papaver L. sect Californicum Kadereit, a new section of the genus Papaver. Rodora 90: 7-13.
25. Kadereit JW. 1988c. The affinities of the south-hemispherical Papaver aculeatum Thunb. (Papaveraceae). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 109: 335-341.
26. Kadereit JW. 1989. A revision of Papaver section Rhoeadium Spach. Notes of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 45: 225-286.
27. Kadereit JW. 1990. Some suggestions on the geographical origin of the central, west and north European synantropic species of Papaver L. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 103: 221-231.
28. Kadereit JW. 1993a. Papaveraceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohweer JG, Bittrich V, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 20-33.
29. Kadereit JW. 1993b. A revision of Papaver sect. Meconidium. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 50: 125-148.
30. Kadereit JW. 1996. A revision of Papaver L. sects Pilosa Prantl and Pseudopilosa M. Popov ex Gunther (Papaveraceae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 53: 285-309.
31. Kadereit JW, Sytsma KJ. 1992. Disassembling Papaver: a restriction site analysis of chloroplast DNA. Nordic Journal of Botany 12: 205-217.
32. Kadereit JW, Schwarzbach AE, Jork KB. 1997. The phylogeny of Papaver s.l. (Papaveraceae): polyphyly or monophyly? Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 75-98.
33. Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 182-198.
34. Markgraf F. 1958. Familie Papaveraceae. In: Hegi P, ed. Illustrietrte Flora von Mittelurropaa Band IV, 2nd edn. Teil 1. Munich: Hanser, 15-49.
35. Morales Torres C, Mendoza Castellon R, Romero Garcia AT. 1988. La posicion sistematica de Papaver argemone L.: interes evolutivo del orden Papaverales: 1. Lagascalia 15: 181-189.
36. Novak J, Preininger V. 1980. Sect., Glauca-nova sekce rodu Papaver. Presila 52: 97-101.
37. Podlech D, Dieterle A. 1969. Chromosomenstudien an Afghanischen Pflanzen. Candollea 24: 185-243.
38. Popov MG. 1937. Papaveraceae. In: Komarov VL, ed. Flora of the USSR. Moscow-Leningrad: Nauka. 470-474.
39. Preininger V. 1986. Chemotaxonomy of Papaveraceae and Fumariaceae. In: The alkaloids. London: Academic Press, 2-98.
40. Preininger V, Novak J, Santavy F. 1981. Isolierung und Chemie der Alkaloide aus Pflanzen der Papaveraceae LXXXXI. Glauca, eine neue Sektion der Gattung Papaver. Planta Medica 41: 119-123.
41. Rändel U. 1974. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Sippenstruktuir der Gattung Papaver L. Sectio Scapiflora Reihenb. Im vergleich mit P. alpinum L. (Papaveraceae). Feddes Repert 86: 19-37.
42. Rändel U. 1977. Über die grondlandischen Vertreter der section Lasiotrachvphylla Bernh. (Papaveraceae). Feddes Repert 88: 421-450.
43. Reckin J. 1973. A contribution to the cytology of Papaver gracile Auch. Including proposals for a revision of the section Mecones. Caryologia 26: 245-251.
44. Salamin N, Chase MW, Hodkinson TR, Savolainen V. 2003. Assessing internal support with large phylogenetic DNA matrices. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27: 528-539.
45. Seelanan T, Schnabel A, Wendel J F. 1997. Congruence and consensus in the cotton tribe (Malvaceae). Systematic Botany 22: 259-290.
46. Savolainen V, Chase M W. 2003. A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics. Trends in Genetics 12: 717-724.
47. Schwarzbach AE, Kadereit JW. 1999. Phylogeny of prickly poppies, Argemone (Papaveraceae), and the evolution of morphological and alkaloid characters based on ITS nrDNA sequence variation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 218: 257-279.
48. Sun Y, Skinner DZ, Liang GH, Hulbert SH. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 26-32.
49. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b 10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
50. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular systematics, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 407-514.
51. Taberlet PL, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Moleular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
52. Taylor G. 1930. Stylomecon: a new genus of Papaveraceae. Journal of Botany 68: 138-140.
53. Wendel JF, Doyle JJ. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ, eds. Molecular systematics of plants II. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 265-296.
54. Wendel JF, Schnabel A, Seelanan T. 1995. An unusual ribosomal DNA sequence from Gossypium gossypioides reveals ancient, cryptic, intergenomic introgression. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 298-313.
55. Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur, BA. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow Loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 108-121.