Anatomical distribution of the degree of mineralization of bone tissue in human femoral neck: Impact on biomechanical properties

Bone

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 876-884

  Sansalone, V ^a   Bousson, V ^b   Naili, S ^a   Bergot, C ^b   Peyrin, F ^c,d   Laredo, J D ^b   Haiat G ^e  

^a Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^d EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone fragility; Bone mineralization; Femoral neck; Imaging; Material properties; Synchrotron radiation microcomputed tomography

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERALIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERIOSTEUM; POROSITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; ELASTICITY; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; POROSITY; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84858073092     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Burr D.B. Cortical bone: a target for fracture prevention?. Lancet 2010, 375(9727):1672-1673.
2. Mayhew P.M., et al. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet 2005, 366(9480):129-135.
3. Lotz J.C., Cheal E.J., Hayes W.C. Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 1995, 5(4):252-261.
4. Viguet-Carrin S., Garnero P., Delmas P.D. The role of collagen in bone strength. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:319-336.
5. Bouxsein M.L., et al. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 2010, 25(7):1468-1486.
6. Burr D.B. Bone quality: understanding what matters. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2004, 4(2):184-186.
7. Boivin G., Meunier P.J. The degree of mineralization of bone tissue measured by computerized quantitative contact microradiography. Calcif Tissue Int 2002, 70(6):503-511.
8. Sasso M., et al. Frequency dependence of ultrasonic attenuation in bovine cortical bone: an in vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33(12):1933-1942.
9. Sasso M., et al. Dependence of ultrasonic attenuation on bone mass and microstructure in bovine cortical bone. J Biomech 2008, 41(2):347-355.
10. Haïat G., et al. Influence of a gradient of material properties on ultrasonic wave propagation in cortical bone: application to axial transmission. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 125(6):4043-5052.
11. Haïat G., et al. Equivalent contributing depth investigated by a lateral wave with axial transmission in viscoelastic cortical bone. J Acoust Soc Am 2011, 129:EL114-EL120.
12. Naili S., et al. Influence of viscoelastic and viscous absorption on ultrasonic wave propagation in cortical bone: application to axial transmission. J Acoust Soc Am 2010, 127(4):2622-2634.
13. Bousson V., et al. Distribution of intracortical porosity in human midfemoral cortex by age and gender. J Bone Miner Res 2001, 16(7):1308-1317.
14. Thomas C.D., Feik S.A., Clement J.G. Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences. J Anat 2005, 206(2):115-125.
15. Aoubiza B., Crolet J.M., Meunier A. On the mechanical characterization of compact bone structure using the homogenization theory. J Biomech 1996, 29(12):1539-1547.
16. Arnoux P.J., et al. Numerical damage models using a structural approach: application in bones and ligaments. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 2002, 17:65-73.
17. Hellmich C., Ulm F.J. Micromechanical Model for Ultrastructural Stiffness of Mineralized Tissues. J Eng Mech 2002, 128(8):898-908.
18. Hellmich C., Barthelemy J., Dormieux L. Mineral-collagen interactions in elasticity of bone ultrastructure - a continuum micromechanics approach. Eur J Mech A Solids 2004, 23:783-810.
19. Chevalier Y., et al. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation. J Biomech 2007, 40(15):3333-3340.
20. Haïat G., et al. Variation of ultrasonic parameters with microstructure and material properties of trabecular bone: a 3-D model simulation. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22(5):665-674.
21. Haïat G., et al. Fast wave ultrasonic propagation in trabecular bone: numerical study of the influence of porosity and structural anisotropy. J Acoust Soc Am 2008, 123(3):1694-1705.
22. Haïat G., Padilla F., Laugier P. Sensitivity of qus parameters to controlled variations of bone strength assessed with a cellular model. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008, 55(7):1488-1496.
23. Sansalone V., et al. Determination of the heterogeneous anisotropic elastic properties of human femoral bone: from nanoscopic to organ scale. J Biomech 2010, 2010:12.
24. Werner C., Iversen B.F., Therkildsen M.H. Contribution of the trabecular component to mechanical strength and bone mineral content of the femoral neck. An experimental study on cadaver bones. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1988, 48(5):457-460.
25. Salome M., et al. A synchrotron radiation microtomography system for the analysis of trabecular bone samples. Med Phys 1999, 26(10):2194-2204.
26. Nuzzo S., et al. Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. Med Phys 2002, 29(11):2672-2681.
27. Sachez del Rio M., Dejus R.J. XOP 2.1: a new version of the X-ray optics software toolkit. Synchrotron radiation instrumentation: Eighth International Conference 2004, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY.
28. Raum K., et al. Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(3):747-758.
29. Broz J.J., Simske S.J., Greenberg A.R. Material and compositional properties of selectively demineralised cortical bone. J Biomech 1995, 28(11):1357-1368.
30. Suquet, P., Continuum Micromechanics. CISM Lecture Notes ed. Springer-Verlag. Vol. 377. 1997, Wien: Suquet P.
31. Lees S., et al. The loci of mineral in Turkey leg tendon as seen by atomic force microscope and electron microscopy. Calcif Tissue Int 1994, 55:180-189.
32. Nemat-Nasser, S. and M. Hori, Micromechanics: Overall properties of heterogeneous materials. 2nd ed. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, ed. North-Holland. 1999, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
33. Peel N. Bone remodelling and disorders of bone metabolism. Surgery (Oxford) 2009, 27(2):70-74.
34. Crabtree N., et al. Intracapsular hip fracture and the region-specific loss of cortical bone: analysis by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 2001, 16:1318-1328.
35. Boyce T.M., Bloebaum R.D. Cortical aging differences and fracture implications for the human femoral neck. Bone 1993, 14(5):769-778.
36. Vajda E.G., Bloebaum R.D. Age-related hypermineralization in the female proximal human femur. Anat Rec 1999, 255(2):202-211.
37. Allen M.R., Hock J.M., Burr D.B. Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004, 35:1003-1012.
38. Jager I., Fratzl P. Mineralized collagen fibrils: a mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. Biophys J 2000, 79(4):1737-1746.
39. Currey J. Role of collagen and other organics in the mechanical properties of bone. Osteoporos Int 2003, 14(Suppl 5):S29-S36.
40. van der Linden J.C., et al. Trabecular bone's mechanical properties are affected by its non-uniform mineral distribution. J Biomech 2001, 34(12):1573-1580.
41. Riggs B.L., et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19(12):1945-1954.
42. Bell K.L., et al. Regional differences in cortical porosity in the fractured femoral neck. Bone 1999, 24(1):57-64.
43. Seeman E. Modeling and remodeling: the cellular machinery responsible for the gain and loss of bone's material and structural strength. Principles of bone biology 2008, 3-28. Elsevier, San Diego, CA USA. J.P. R.L. Bilezikian, T.J. Martin (Eds.).
44. Zebaze R.M., et al. Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 1729, 375(9727):1729-1736.
45. Han Z.H., et al. Effect of ethnicity and age or menopause on the structure and geometry of iliac bone. J Bone Miner Res 1996, 11(12):1967-1975.
46. Voo L., Armand M., Kleinberger M. Stress fracture risk analysis of the human femur based on computational biomechanics. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig. 2004, 25:223-230.
47. de Bakker A., et al. During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. J Biomech 2009, 42(2009):1917-1925.
48. Poole K.E., et al. Changing structure of the femoral neck across the adult female lifespan. J Bone Miner Res 2010, 25(3):482-491.
49. Jaffe H.L. Metabolic degenerative and inflammatory diseases of bone and joints 1972, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, Chapter 3.
50. Zwierzak I., Baleani M., Viceconti M. Microindentation on cortical human bone: effects of tissue condition and indentation location on hardness values. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2009, 223(7):913-918.
51. Currey J.D. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech 1988, 21(2):131-139.