Top five craniofacial techniques for training in plastic surgery residency

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Fan, Kenneth ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Kawamoto, Henry K ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   McCarthy, Joseph G ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Bartlett, Scott P ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Matthews, David C ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Wolfe, S Anthony ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Tanna, Neil ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Vu, Minh Thien ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}   Bradley, James P ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f MIAMI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FACE; FACIAL BONE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SKULL;

FACE; FACIAL BONES; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SKULL; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 84858032606     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402e2e     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994;108:233-242.
2. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed., 2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2007.
3. Karacaoǧlan N, Uysal OA. Use of iliac bone graft for saddle nose deformity. Auris Nasus Larynx 1998;25:49-57.
4. Tessier P. Aesthetic aspects of bone grafting to the face. Clin Plast Surg. 1981;8:279-301.
5. Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Alloplastic nasal and perialar augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;23:315-326.
6. Cook TA, Wang TD, Brownrigg PJ, Quatela VC. Significant premaxillary augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:1197-1201.
7. Baek SM, Kim SS, Bindiger A. The prominent mandibular angle: Preoperative management, operative technique, and results in 42 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:272-280.
8. Yaremchuk MJ, Israeli D. Paranasal implants for correction of midface concavity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1676-1684; discussion 1685.
9. Ousterhout DK, Weil RB. The role of the lateral canthal tendon in lower eyelid laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:620-623.
10. Flowers RS. Canthopexy as a routine blepharoplasty component. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:351-365.
11. McCord CD, Boswell CB, Hester TR. Lateral canthal anchoring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:222-237; discussion 238-239.
12. Flowers RS, Nassif JM, Rubin PA, Hayakawa T, Lehr SK. A key to canthopexy: The tarsal strap. A fresh cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1752-1758; discussion 1759-1760.
13. Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams WP Jr. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:873-884; discussion 897-911.
14. Marsh JL, Edgerton MT. Periosteal pennant lateral canthoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:24-29.
15. Flowers RS, Nassif JM. Aesthetic periorbital surgery. In: Mathes SJ, ed. Plastic Surgery. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006:111-125.
16. Whitaker LA. Selective alteration of palpebral fissure form by lateral canthopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:611-619.
17. Fagien S. Algorithm for canthoplasty: The lateral retinacular suspension. A simplified suture canthopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:2042-2053; discussion 2054-2058.
18. Salyer KE. Techniques in Aesthetic Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1989.
19. Guyuron B. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: Genioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(Suppl):1-7.
20. Chowdhury K, Krause GE. Selection of materials for orbital floor reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124:1398-1401.
21. Hardesty RA, Marsh JL. Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: A prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:5-14; discussion 15.
22. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: Implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:778-785.
23. Kusiak JF, Zins JE, Whitaker LA. The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:510-516.
24. Carr MM. Program directors' opinions about surgical competency in otolaryngology residents. Laryngoscope 2005;115: 1208-1211.