Effects of habitat characteristics and interspecific interactions on co-occurrence patterns of saproxylic beetles breeding in tree boles after forest fire: Null model analyses

Oecologia

Volumn 168, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1123-1135

  Azeria, Ermias T ^a   Ibarzabal, Jacques ^b   Hébert, Christian ^a  

^a LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À CHICOUTIMI   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community assembly; Forest fire; Habitat constrained null models; Interspecific interactions; Saproxylic beetles; Species habitat association

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; BEETLE; BOREAL FOREST; COEXISTENCE; DISTURBANCE; EMERGENCE; FOREST FIRE; HABITAT TYPE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; ECOSYSTEM; FIRE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; ECOSYSTEM; FIRES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; QUEBEC; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES;

COLEOPTERA;

EID: 84858005115     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2180-0     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allison JD, Borden JH, McIntosh RL, De Groot P, Gries R (2001) Kairomonal response by four Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to bark beetle pheromones. J Chem Ecol 27: 633-646.
2. Allison JD, Borden JH, Seybold SJ (2004) A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology 14: 123-150.
3. Azeria ET (2004) Community dynamics of insular biotas in space and time. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
4. Azeria ET, Fortin D, Hébert C, Peres-Neto P, Pothier D, Ruel J-C (2009a) Using null model analysis of species co-occurrences to deconstruct biodiversity patterns and select indicator species. Divers Distrib 15: 958-971.
5. Azeria ET, Fortin D, Lemaître J, Janssen P, Hébert C, Darveau M, Cumming SG (2009b) Fine-scale structure and cross-taxon congruence of bird and beetle assemblages in an old-growth boreal forest mosaic. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18: 333-345.
6. Azeria ET, Bouchard M, Pothier D, Fortin D, Hébert C (2011) Using biodiversity deconstruction to disentangle assembly and diversity dynamics of understorey plants along post fire succession in boreal forest. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20: 119-133.
7. Bergström U, Englund G (2002) Estimating predation rates in experimental systems: scale-dependent effects of aggregative behaviour. Oikos 97: 251-259.
8. Boucher J (2011) Impacts de la coupe de récupération après feu sur les coléoptéres associés aux brûlis en forêt boréale: une dynamque temporaelle. Master thesis, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi.
9. Boulanger Y, Sirois L (2007) Postfire succession of saproxylic arthropods, with emphasis on Coleoptera, in the north boreal forest of Quebec. Environ Entomol 36: 128-141.
10. Boulanger Y, Sirois L, Hébert C (2010) Distribution of saproxylic beetles in a recently burnt landscape of the northern boreal forest of Québec. For Ecol Manag 260: 1114-1123.
11. Bowker MA, Soliveres S, Maestre FT (2010) Competition increases with abiotic stress and regulates the diversity of biological soil crusts. J Ecol 980: 551-560.
12. Callaway R, Walker L (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78: 1958-1965.
13. Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5: 302-315.
14. Connell JH (1980) Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131-138.
15. Connor EF, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132-1140.
16. Connor EF, Simberloff D (1983) Interspecific competition and species co-occurrence patterns on islands: null models and the evaluation of evidence. Oikos 41: 455-465.
17. Coulson RN, Mayyasi AM, Foltz JL, Hain FP (1976) Interspecific competition between Monochamus titillator and Dendroctonus frontalis. Environ Entomol 5: 235-247.
18. De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90: 3566-3574.
19. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342-444.
20. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297-302.
21. Dodds KJ, Graber C, Stephen FM (2001) Facultative intraguild predation by larval Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) on bark beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 30: 17-22.
22. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606-2621.
23. Gotelli NJ (2001) Research frontiers in null model analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10: 337-343.
24. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) Swap and fill algorithms in null model analysis: rethinking the knight's tour. Oecologia 129: 281-291.
25. Gotelli NJ, Graves GR (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.
26. Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ (2002) Species co-occurrence: a metaanalysis of J. M. Diamond's assembly rules model. Ecology 83: 2091-2096.
27. Gotelli NJ, Ulrich W (2010) The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations. Oecologia 162: 463-477.
28. Gotelli NJ, Buckley NJ, Wiens JA (1997) Co-occurrence of Australian land birds: Diamond's assembly rules revisited. Oikos 80: 311-324.
29. Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33: 1-23.
30. Harvey PH, Colwell RK, Silverton JW, May RM (1983) Null models in ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 14: 189-211.
31. Holt RD (1984) Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am Nat 124: 377-406.
32. Hughes AR, Grabowski JH (2006) Habitat context influences predator interference interactions and the strength of resource partitioning. Oecologia 149: 256-264.
33. Jaccard P (1901) Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat 37: 547-579.
34. Jackson DA, Somers KM, Harvey HH (1992) Null models and fish communities: evidence of nonrandom patterns. Am Nat 139: 930-951.
35. Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol Linn Soc 23: 269-286.
36. Kenis M, Wermelinger B, Grégoire J-C (2004) Research on parasitoids and predators of Scolytidae, a review. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire J-C, Evans HF (eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 237-290.
37. Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11: 73-82.
38. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
39. Maltez-Mouroa S, Maestre FT, Freitasa H (2010) Co-occurrence patterns and abiotic stress in sand-dune communities: their relationship varies with spatial scale and the stress estimator. Acta Oecol 36: 80-84.
40. McCullough DG, Werner RA, Neumann D (1998) Fire and insects in northern and boreal forest ecosystems of North America. Annu Rev Entomol 43: 107-127.
41. Miklós I, Podani J (2004) Randomization of presence-absence matrices: comments and new algorithms. Ecology 85: 86-92.
42. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O'Hara B, Henry M, Stevens MHH, Wagner, H (2010) Vegan: community ecology package. http://cran. R-project. org/web/packages/vegan (accessed 30 April 2010).
43. Ovaskainen O, Hottola J, Siitonen J (2010) Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. Ecology 91: 2514-2521.
44. Peres-Neto PR (2004) Patterns in the co-occurrence of fish species in streams: the role of site suitability, morphology and phylogeny versus species interactions. Oecologia 140: 352-360.
45. Peres-Neto PR, Olden JD, Jackson DA (2001) Environmentally constrained null models: site suitability as occupancy criterion. Oikos 93: 110-120.
46. Pitzalis MA, Luiselli L, Bologna M (2010) Co-occurrence analyses show that non-random community structure is disrupted by fire in two groups of soil arthropods (Isopoda Oniscidea and Collembola). Acta Oecol 36: 100-106.
47. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://cran. r-project. org/.
48. Raffa KF, Dahlsten DL (1995) Differential responses among natural enemies and prey to bark beetle pheromones. Oecologia 102: 17-23.
49. Rejmánek M, Lepš J (1996) Negative associations can reveal interspecific competition and reversal of competitive hierarchies during succession. Oikos 76: 161-168.
50. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New York.
51. Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Hébert C (2004a) Landscape-scale habitat selection patterns of Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in a recently burned black spruce forest. Environ Entomol 33: 1703-1710.
52. Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Hébert C (2004b) Xylophagous insect species composition and patterns of substratum use on fire-killed black spruce in central Quebec. Can J For Res 34: 677-685.
53. Sanderson JG (2000) Testing ecological patterns. Am Sci 88: 332-339.
54. Sanderson JG (2004) Null model analysis of communities on gradients. J Biogeogr 31: 879-883.
55. Sara M, Bellia E, Milazzo A (2006) Fire disturbance disrupts co-occurrence patterns of terrestrial vertebrates in Mediterranean woodlands. J Biogeogr 33: 843-852.
56. Savely HE Jr (1939) Ecological relations of certain animals in dead pine and oak logs. Ecol Monogr 9: 321-385.
57. Sfenthourakis S, Tzanatos E, Giokas S (2006) Species co-occurrence: the case of congeneric species and a causal approach to patterns of species association. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15: 39-49.
58. Stone L, Roberts A (1990) The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 85: 74-79.
59. Stone L, Roberts A (1992) Competitive exclusion, or species aggregation? An aid in deciding. Oecologia 91: 419-424.
60. Ulrich W (2004) Species co-occurrences and neutral models: reassessing J. M. Diamond's assembly rules. Oikos 107: 603-609.
61. Wilson JB (1987) Methods for detecting non-randomness in species co-occurrences: a contribution. Oecologia 73: 579-582.
62. Wright SJ, Biehl CC (1982) Island biogeographic distributions: testing for random regular, and aggregated patterns of species co-occurrence. Am Nat 119: 345-357.
63. Zaman A, Simberloff D (2002) Random binary matrices in biogeographical ecology-instituting a good neighbor policy. Environ Ecol Stat 9: 405-421.