Not all created equal: Individual-technology fit of brain-computer interfaces

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 572-578

  Randolph, Adriane B ^a  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

CONTROL SIGNAL; INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY; MOTOR CORTEX; MU RHYTHM; TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT; USER CHARACTERISTICS;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

EID: 84857968063     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.451     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Carroll, J.M., ed. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Towards a Multidisciplinary Science. 2003, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco.
2. Wolpaw, J.R., et al., Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002. 113(6): p. 767-791.
3. Britt, T.W., A.B. Adler, and C.A. Castro, Military Life: The Psychology of Serving in Peace and Combat. Vol. 1. 2006: Greenwood Publishing Group. 255.
4. Nijholt, A., B. Reuderink, and D.O. Bos, Turning Shortcomings into Challenges: Brain-Computer Interfaces for Games, in Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. 2009, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 153-168.
5. Moore, M.M., Real-World Applications for Brain-Computer Interface Technology. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2003. 11(2): p. 162-165.
6. Sannelli, C., et al., Estimating Noise and Dimensionality in BCI Data Sets: Towards BCI Illiteracy Comprehension, in 4th International Brain-Computer Interface Workshop and Training Course. 2008: Graz, Austria.
7. Nam, C.S., et al., Usability of the P300 Speller: Towards a More Sustainable Brain-Computer Interface. e-Minds: International Journal on Human-Computer Interaction, 2009. 1(5): p. 111-125.
8. Tan, L.-F., et al., Effect of Mental Training on BCI Performance, in 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part II: Novel Interaction Methods and Techniques, J.A. Jacko, Editor. 2009, Springer: San Diego, CA. p. 632-635.
9. Riedl, R., et al. The Potential of Neuroscience for Human-Computer Interaction Research. in SIGHCI 2010. 2010. Saint Louis, MO.
10. Dimoka, A., P.A. Pavlou, and F. Davis, NeuroIS: The Potential of Cognitive Neuroscience for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, Forthcoming.
11. Allison, B.Z., The I of BCIs: Next Generation Interfaces for Brain-Computer Interface Systems That Adapt to Individual Users, in 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part II: Novel Interaction Methods and Techniques, J.A. Jacko, Editor. 2009, Springer: San Diego, CA. p. 558-568.
12. Randolph, A.B. and M.M. Moore Jackson, Assessing Fit of Nontraditional Assistive Technologies. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 2010. 2(4).
13. Randolph, A.B., et al. BioGauges for Characterizing Biometric Interface Systems. in Third International Meeting of Brain-Computer Interface Technology. 2005. Rensselaerville, NY.
14. Randolph, A.B., et al. Controllability of Galvanic Skin Response. in 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII). 2005. Las Vegas, NV.
15. Guger, C., et al., How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neuroscience Letters, 2009. 462(1): p. 94-98.
16. Kübler, A. and N. Birbaumer, Brain-computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? Clinical Neurophysiology, 2008. 119(11): p. 2658-2666.
17. Allison, B., et al., BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI? IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2010: p. 107 - 116.
18. Nijholt, A., et al., Brain-Computer Interfacing for Intelligent Systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2008. 23(3): p. 72-79.
19. Wolpaw, J.R., et al., An EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Cursor Control. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1991. 78(3): p. 252-259.
20. Wolpaw, J.R. and D.J. McFarland, Multichannel EEG-based Brain-Computer Communication. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1994. 90: p. 444-449.
21. Venkatraman, N., The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 1989. 13(3, July): p. 423-444.
22. Joyce, W., J.W. Slocum, and M.A.V. Glinow, Person-Situation Interaction: Competing Models of Fit. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1982. 3(4): p. 265-280.
23. Chandler, A.D., Strategy and Structure. 1962, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Zigurs, I. and B.K. Buckland, A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 1998. 22(3): p. 313-334.
25. Goodhue, D.L. and R.L. Thompson, Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 1995. 19(2 (June)): p. 213-236.
26. Goodhue, D.L., Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 1995. 41(12): p. 1827-1844.
27. Dishaw, M.T. and D.M. Strong. Experience as a Moderating Variable in a Task-Technology Fit Model. in Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). 1998. Baltimore, MD.
28. Mason, S.G., M.M. Moore Jackson, and G.E. Birch, A General Framework for Characterizing Studies of Brain Interface Technology. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2005. 33(11): p. 1653-1670.
29. Scherer, M.J. and G. Craddock, Matching Person & Technology (MPT) Assessment Process. Technology and Disability, 2002. 14(3): p. 125 - 131.
30. Randolph, A.B., M.M. Jackson, and S. Karmakar, Individual Characteristics and Their Effect on Predicting Mu Rhythm Modulation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2011. 27(1): p. 1-14.
31. Schalk, G., et al., BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2004. 51(6): p. 1034-1043.