Candidate preferences and expectations of election outcomes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 3711-3715

  Delavande, Adeline ^a,b   Manski, Charles F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERCEPTION; POLITICAL SYSTEM; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC FIGURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84857960898     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200861109     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fabrigar L, Krosnick J (1995) Attitude importance and the false consensus effect. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 21:468-479.
2. Wallen R (1943) Individuals' estimates of group opinion. J Soc Psychol 17:269-274.
3. Ross L, Greene D, House P (1977) The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 13:279-301.
4. Katz D, Allport F (1931) Students' Attitudes (Craftsman, Syracuse, NY).
5. Robbins JM, Krueger JI (2005) Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 9:32-47. (Pubitemid 40447984)
6. Dawes R (1989) Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. J Exp Soc Psychol 25:l-17.
7. Dawes R, Mulford M (1996) The false consensus effect and overconfidence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 66:201-211.
8. Manski C (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60:531-542.
9. Granberg D, Brent E (1983) When prophecy bends: The preference- expectation link in U.S. presidential elections, 1952-1980. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:477-491.
10. Bartels L (1985) Expectations and preferences in presidential nominating campaigns. Am Polit Sci Rev 79:804-815.
11. Berelson B, Lazarsfeld P, McPhee W (1954) Voting (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
12. Hayes S (1936) The predictive ability of voters. J Soc Psychol 7:183-191.
13. Brown C (1982) A false consensus bias in 1980 presidential preferences. J Soc Psychol 118:137-138.
14. Baker L, Koestner R, Worren N, Losier G, Vallerand R (1995) False consensus effects for the 1992 canadian referendum. Can J Behav Sci 27:214-225.
15. Morwitz V, Pluzinsky C (1996) Do polls reflect opinions or do opinions reflect polls? J Consum Res 23:53-67.
16. Nir L (2011) Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opin Q 75:504-532.
17. Delavande A, Manski C (2010) Probabilistic polling and voting in the 2008 presidential election: Evidence from the American Life Panel. Public Opin Q 74:433-459.
18. Manski C (2004) Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72:1329-1376.
19. Hurd MD (2009) Subjective probabilities in household surveys. Annu Rev Econom 1:543-562.
20. Delavande A, Giné X, McKenzie D (2011) Measuring subjective expectations in developing countries: A critical review and new evidence. J Dev Econ 94:151-163.
21. Manski C (1990) The use of intentions data to predict behavior: A best case analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 85:934-940.
22. Manski C (1999) Analysis of choice expectations in incomplete scenarios. J Risk Uncertain 19:49-66.