Evaluation of auditory function in a population of clinically healthy cats using evoked otoacoustic emissions

Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 919-926

  McBrearty, Alix R ^a   Penderis, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CAT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ANIMALS; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; CATS; FEMALE; HEARING; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 84857958831     PISSN: 1098612X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfms.2011.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Strain GM. Aetiology, prevalence and diagnosis of deafness in dogs and cats. Br Vet J 1996; 152: 17e36.
2. Anders BB, Hoelzler MG, Scavelli TD, Fulcher RP, Bastian RP. Analysis of auditory and neurologic effects associated with ventral bulla osteotomy for removal of inflammatory polyps or nasopharyngeal masses in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 580-5.
3. Merchant SR. Ototoxicity. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1994; 24: 971-80.
4. Delack JB. Hereditary deafness in the white cat. Compend Cont Edu Pract Vet 1984; 6: 609-17.
5. Bergsma DR, Brown KS. White fur, blue eyes, and deafness in the domestic cat. J Hered 1971; 62: 171-85.
6. Cvejic D, Steinberg TA, Kent MS, Fischer A. Unilateral and bilateral congenital sensorineural deafness in client-owned pure-breed white cats. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 392-5.
7. Mair IW. Hereditary deafness in the white cat. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1973; 314: 1-48.
8. Rebillard M, Rebillard G, Pujol R. Variability of the hereditary deafness in the white cat. I. Physiology. Hear Res 1981; 5: 179-87.
9. Strain GM. Congenital deafness and its recognition. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29: 895-907.
10. Luttgen PJ. Deafness in the dog and cat. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1994; 24: 981-9.
11. Sims MH, Horohov JE. Effects of xylazine and ketamine on the acoustic reflex and brain stem auditory-evoked response in the cat. Am J Vet Res 1986; 47: 102-9.
12. Rebillard M, Pujol R, Rebillard G. Variability of the hereditary deafness in the white cat. II. Histology. Hear Res 1981; 5: 189-200.
13. Geigy CA, Heid S, Steffen F, Danielson K, Jaggy A, Gaillard C. Does a pleiotropic gene explain deafness and blue irises in white cats? Vet J 2007; 173: 548-53.
14. National Institutes of Health. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement 1993:1-25.
15. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br Med Bull 2002; 63: 223-41.
16. Lonsbury-Martin BL, McCoy MJ, Whitehead ML, Martin GK. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 11-22.
17. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Otoacoustic emissions: basic studies in mammalian models. In: Manley GA, Fay FF, Popper AN, eds. Active processes and otoacoustic emissions. 1st edn. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2008: 261-303.
18. Hall JW. Handbook of otoacoustic emissions. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 2000.
19. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144-54.
20. Janssen T, Muller J. Otoacoustic emissions as a diagnostic tool in a clinical context. In: Manley GA, Fay FF, Popper AN, eds. Active processes and otoacoustic emissions. 1st edn. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2008: 421-60.
21. Kim DO, Molnar CE, Matthews JW. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1704-21.
22. Fahey PF, Allen JB. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 599-612.
23. Puria S, Guinan Jr JJ, Liberman MC. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 500-7.
24. Liberman MC, Puria S, Guinan Jr JJ. The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlear reflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2f1 - f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 3572-84.
25. Voss SE, Shera CA. Simultaneous measurement of middle-ear input impedance and forward/reverse transmission in cat. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 2187-98.
26. Dolan TG, Abbas PJ. Changes in the 2f1 - f2 acoustic emission and whole-nerve response following sound exposure: long-term effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 1475-83.
27. Dolan TG, Abbas PJ. Short-term effects of sound exposure on the 2f1 - f2 acoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 1614-6.
28. Schmiedt RA. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1481-90.
29. De Capua CB, Costantini D, Martufi C, Latini G, Gentile M, De FC. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83: 601-6.
30. Maxon AB, White KR, Behrens TR, Vohr BR. Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 271-7.
31. Rhodes MC, Margolis RH, Hirsch JE, Napp AP. Hearing screening in the newborn intensive care nursery: comparison of methods. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120: 799-808.
32. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: summary and recommendations. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 529-35.
33. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1 - f2 distortionproduct otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2662-82.
34. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1 - f2 distortionproduct otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1587-607.