Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 431-437

  Raftopoulos, I ^a,c   Reed, J F ^b,d   Bergamaschi, R ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominoperineal resection (APR); Cancer; Circumferential resection margin (CRM); Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CARCINOMA; REOPERATION; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ABDOMEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; PERINEUM; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84857955512     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02626.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Nissan A, Guillem JG, Paty PB et al. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 27-35.
2. Radcliffe A. Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive? Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 160-7.
3. Tekkis P, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD. Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 369-74.
4. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Sains PS, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG; Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 29-36.
5. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E et al. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 48-58.
6. Quirke P, Dixon MF. The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988; 3: 127-31.
7. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 303-12.
8. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 350-7.
9. Decanini C, Milsom JW, Böhm B, Fazio VW. Laparoscopic oncologic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 552-8.
10. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961; 178: 261-6.
11. Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anvari M et al. Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 930-9.
12. Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Hawaldar R et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection for large-sized anorectal cancers: a single-institution experience of 59 cases. Indian J Med Sci 2009; 63: 109-14.
13. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Putter H et al. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 83-90.
14. Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908; 2: 1812-3.
15. Morson BC, Vaughan EG, Bussey HJR. Pelvic recurrence after excision of rectum for carcinoma. Br Med J 1963; 2: 13-8.
16. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA et al. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 9257-64.
17. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Torbjorn H, Quirke P. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3517-22.
18. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJE, Holme T, Quirke P; European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 588-99.
19. Jayne DG, Guillou HT, Thorpe H et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3061-8.