Two historical strands in studying visual direction

Japanese Psychological Research

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-88

  Ono, Hiroshi ^a   Wade, Nicholas J ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Reference point; Space perception; Visual direction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857941442     PISSN: 00215368     EISSN: 14685884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00506.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alder, F. H. (1950). Physiology of the eye. London: Mosby.
2. Alhazen (1572). Opticae thesaurus. (Trans. & Ed. by F. Risner), Basel: Gallia.
3. Barbeito, R. (1981). Sight dominance: An explanation based on the processing of visual direction in tests of sighting dominance. Vision Research, 21, 855-860.
4. Barbeito, R., & Simpson, T. L. (1991). The relationship between eye position and egocentric visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 373-382.
5. Brewster, D. (1830). Optics. Edinburgh encyclopædia. Vol. 15. Edinburgh: Blackwoods, pp. 460-662.
6. Brewster, D. (1831). Optics. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, & Green, and John Taylor.
7. Brewster, D. (1844). On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision, and on the representation of solid figures by the union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina. Philosophical Magazine, 15, 356-365.
8. Burt, P., & Julesz, B. (1980a). Modifications of the classical notion of Panum'sfusional area. Perception, 9, 671-682.
9. Burt, P., & Julesz, B. (1980b). A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. Science, 208, 615-617.
10. Burton, H. E. (1945). The optics of Euclid. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 35, 357-372.
11. Carpenter, R. H. S. (1988). Movements of the eyes. London: Pion.
12. Cline, D., Hofstetter, H. W., & Griffin, J. R. (1989). Dictionary of visual science. 4th ed. Radnor: Chilton Trade Book Publishing.
13. Delambre, J. B. J. (1812). Die Optik des Ptolemäus, verglichen mit der Euclid's, Alhazen's und Vitellio's. Annalen der Physik, 40, 371-388.
14. Enright, J. T. (1988). The cyclopean eye and its implications: Vergence state and visual direction. Vision Research, 28, 925-930.
15. Erkelens, C. J. (2000). Perceived direction during monocular viewing is based on signals of the viewing eye only. Vision Research, 40, 2411-2419.
16. Erkelens, C. J., & van Ee, R. (1996). Capture of the visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects. Vision Research, 37, 1735-1745.
17. Erkelens, C. J., & van Ee, R. (1997). Capture of the visual direction: An unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision. Vision Research, 37, 1193-1196.
18. Erkelens, C. J., & van Ee, R. (2002). The role of the cyclopean eye in vision: Sometimes inappropriate, always irrelevant. (Published erratum appears in 2002 Vision Research, 42, 2037.) Vision Research, 42, 1157-1163.
19. Erkelens, C. J., & van de Grind, W. A. (1994). Binocular visual direction. Vision Research, 34, 2693-2969.
20. Erkelens, C. J., Muijs, A. J. M., & van Ee, R. (1996). Binocular alignment in different depth planes. Vision Research, 36, 2141-2147.
21. Helmholtz, H. (1925). Treatise on physiological optics. Vol. 3. (Trans. & Ed. J. P. C. Southall), New York: the Optical Society of America. (Original work published (1910). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Aufl., 3. Bd. 19. Hamburg: Leopold Voss).
22. Hering, E. (1942). Spatial sense and movements of the eye. (Trans. by C. A. Radde), Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry. (Original work published (1879) Der Raumsinn und die Bewegungen des Auges. In L. Hermann (Ed.), Handbuch der Physiologie, Vol. 3, Part 1. Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes. Leipzig: Vogel, pp 343-601).
23. Hering, E. (1977). The theory of binocular vision. (Trans. by B. Bridgeman, Ed. by B. Bridgeman & L. Stark), New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published (1868). Die Lehre vom binokularen. Sehen, Leipzig: Wilhelm Englemann).
24. Hershenson, M. (1999). Visual space perception. London: MIT Press.
25. Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. Chichester: John Wiley & Son.
26. Howard, I. P. (1996). Alhazen's neglected discoveries of visual phenomena. Perception, 25, 1203-1217.
27. Howard, I. P. (1999). The Helmholtz-Hering debate in retrospect. Perception, 28, 543-549.
28. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2002). Seeing in depth. Vol. 2. Depth perception. Toronto, ON: Porteous Publisher.
29. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (in press). Seeing in depth. Vol. 2. Depth perception. New York: Oxford.
30. Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. London: John Wiley.
31. Howard, I. P., & Wade, N. J. (1996). Ptolemy's contributions to the geometry of binocular vision. Perception, 25, 1189-1201.
32. Kaufman, L. (1974). Sight and mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Kepler, J. (1611). Dioptrice. Augsburg: Franci.
34. Kepler, J. (2000). Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo, and optical part of astronomy. (Trans. by W. H. Donahue), Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press. (Original work published (1604). Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena. Frankfurt: Marinium and Aubrii).
35. Khan, A. Z., & Crawford, J. D. (2001). Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Research, 41, 1743-1748.
36. Khan, A. Z., & Crawford, J. D. (2003). Coordinating one hand with two eyes: Optimizing for field of view in a pointing task. Vision Research, 43, 409-417.
37. Khokhotva, M., Ono, H., & Mapp, A. P. (2005). The cyclopean eye is relevant for predicting visual direction. Vision Research, 45, 2339-2345.
38. LeConte, J. (1871). On some phenomena of binocular vision; The mode of representing the position of double images. American Journal of Science, 1, 33-44.
39. LeConte, J. (1881). Sight: An exposition of the principles of monocular and binocular vision. New York: Appleton.
40. LeConte, J. (1897). Sight: An exposition of the principles of monocular and binocular vision. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton.
41. Lejeune, A. (Ed.) (1956). L'optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d'après l'arabe de l'Émir Eugène de Sicile. Louvain: Université de Louvain.
42. Mach, E. (1926). The principles of physical optics. An historical and philosophical treatment. (Trans. by S. Anderson & A. F. A. Young), London: Methuen. (Original work published (1921). Prinzipien der physikalischen Optik. Leipzig: Barth).
43. Mapp, A. P., Ono, H., & Barbeito, R. (2003). What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 310-317.
44. Mapp, A. P., Ono, H., & Howard, I. P. (2002). Binocular visual direction. In I. P. Howard & B. J. Rogers (Eds.), Seeing in depth. Vol. 2. Depth perception. Toronto, ON: Porteous Publisher, pp. 85-99.
45. Mapp, A. P., Ono, H., & Howard, I. P. (in press). Binocular visual direction. In I. P. Howard, & B. J. Rogers (Eds.), Seeing in depth. Vol. 2. Depth perception. New York, NY: Oxford.
46. Marlow, P. (2010). Perceived visual direction at the edge between two surfaces at different stereoscopic depth. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
47. Mayo, H. (1833). Outlines of human physiology. 3rd ed. London: Burgess and Hill.
48. Nakamizo, S., Shimono, K., Kondo, M., & Ono, H. (1994). Visual directions of two stimuli in the Panum's limiting case. Perception, 23, 1037-1048.
49. Ono, H. (1979). Axiomatic summary and deductions from Hering's principles of visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 473-477.
50. Ono, H. (1981). On Wells's (1792) law of visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 403-406.
51. Ono, H. (1991). Binocular visual directions of an object when seen as single or double. In D. Regan (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 9. Binocular vision. London: MacMillan, pp. 1-18.
52. Ono, H., & Barbeito, R. (1982). The cyclopean eye vs the sighting dominant eye as the center of visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 201-210.
53. Ono, H., & Gonda, G. (1978). Apparent movement, eye movement and phoria when two eyes alternate in viewing a stimulus. Perception, 7, 75-83. (Reprinted (1997) as Apparent motion based on changing phoria. In I. Rock (Ed.). Indirect perception. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 265-276).
54. Ono, H., Lillakas, L., Grove, P. M., & Suzuki, M. (2003a). Leonardo's constraint: Two opaque objects cannot be seen in the same direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 253-265.
55. Ono, H., Lillakas, L., & Mapp, A. P. (2003b). The making of the direction sensing system for the Howard eggmobile. In L. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.), Levels of perception. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 127-147.
56. Ono, H., & Mapp, A. P. (1995). A restatement and modification of Wells-Hering's laws of visual direction. Perception, 24, 237-252.
57. Ono, H., Mapp, A. P., & Howard, I. P. (2002). The cyclopean eye in vision: The new and old data continue to hit you right between the eyes. Vision Research, 42, 1307-1324.
58. Ono, H., Mapp, A. P., & Mizushina, H. (2007). The cyclopean illusion unleashed. Vision Research, 47, 2067-2075.
59. Ono, H., Wade, N. J., & Lillakas, L. (2009). Binocular vision: Defining the historical direction. Perception, 38, 492-507.
60. Ono, H., & Weber, E. V. (1981). Nonveridical visual direction produced by monocular viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 937-947.
61. Ono, H., Wilkinson, A., Muter, P., & Mitson, L. (1972). Apparent movement and change in perceived location of a stimulus produced by a change in accommodative vergence. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 187-192.
62. Pickwell, L. D. (1972). Hering's law of equal innervation and the position of the binoculus. Vision Research, 12, 1499-1507.
63. Porterfield, W. (1737). An essay concerning the motions of our eyes. Part 1. Of their external motions. Edinburgh Medical Essays and Observations, 3, 160-263.
64. Rubin, M. L., & Walls, G. L. (1969). Fundamentals of visual science. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
65. Sabra, A. I. (Ed. & Trans.) (1989). The optics of Ibn al-Haytham. Books I-III. On direct vision. London: The Warburg Institute.
66. Shimono, K., Tam, W. J., Asakura, N., & Ohmi, M. (2005). Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes. Vision Research, 45, 2631-2641.
67. Shimono, K., & Wade, N. J. (2002). Monocular alignment in different depth planes. Vision Research, 42, 1127-1135.
68. Smith, A. M. (1996). Ptolemy's theory of visual perception: An English translation of the optics with introduction and commentary. Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society.
69. Smith, A. M. (2001). Alhacen's theory of visual perception. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.
70. Towne, J. (1865). The stereoscope, and stereoscopic results. Section VI. Guy's Hospital Reports, 11, 144-180.
71. Towne, J. (1866). Contributions to the physiology of binocular vision. Section VII. Guy's Hospital Reports, 12, 285-301.
72. Turner, R. S. (1994). In the eye's mind. Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering controversy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Tyler, C. W. (1991). The horopter binocular fusion. In D. Regan (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 9. Binocular vision. London: MacMillan, pp. 19-37.
74. Tyler, C. W. (1997). On Ptolemy's geometry of binocular vision. Perception, 26, 1579-1581.
75. Wade, N. J. (1998). A natural history of vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Wade, N. J. (2003). Destined for distinguished oblivion: The scientific vision of William Charles Wells (1757-1817). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
77. Wade, N. J., Ono, H., & Mapp, A. P. (2006). The lost direction in binocular vision: The neglected signs posted by Wells, Towne, and LeConte. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 42, 61-86.
78. Wade, N. J., Ono, H., Mapp, A., & Lillakas, L. (2011). The singular vision of William Charles Wells (1757-1817). Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 20, 1-15.
79. Wade, N. J., & Swanston, M. T. (1996). A general model for the perception of space and motion. Perception, 25, 187-194.
80. Walls, G. L. (1951). A theory of ocular dominance. AMA Archives of Opthalmomogy., 45, 387-412.
81. Wells, W. C. (1792). An essay upon single vision with two eyes: Together with experiments and observations on several other subjects in optics. London: Cadell.
82. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision - Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 128, 371-394.
83. Zoethout, W. D. (1927). Physiological optics. Chicago, IL: Professional.